Do you need any more help on etymology?

LHA



I think that person, in an attempt to try to take the moral
high ground, appointed himself the monopoly on
morality and sympathy.

Clint
KB5ZHT

And I think YOU are FRENCH!!! Are you French, Clint?

LOL! that's a good one.


It is fascinating to read your repulsive posts about equating Pro-coder
with Nazi's. Just fascinating. However, you have convinced me of one
thing.I think you are perhaps the epitome of the No-coder, the brave new
ham that takes the ARS into the 21st century.


well, i'll play your little game.
Are you saying that, if that IS so, than they don't meet YOUR qualifications
even if they DO meet the FCC's qualifications, and therefore are invalid?
I guess it's going to be a shock for the millions of hams worldwide to find
out that the Final and Last Word falls to Mike, KB3EIA.

And you insinuate that I am judgemental.

Clint
KB5ZHT

Hey, look your family members certainly have my
sympathy for what happened, but do not try to use
that moral high ground to change and divert the course
HERE.

I guess freedom of speech, if and only if it doesn't
offend? If you really got that offended by what I said,
and this is the last time I will speak to you on this matter
(period), then block my messages from being downloaded
on your computer, or do not read them; however, you
should not try to censor anybody.

Clint
KB5ZHT

"Clint" wrote ...

Hey, look your family members certainly have my sympathy for what happened,
but do not try to use that moral high ground to change and divert the course
HERE.

I guess freedom of speech, if and only if it doesn't offend? If you really
got that offended by what I said, and this is the last time I will speak to
you on this matter (period), then block my messages from being downloaded on
your computer, or do not read them; however, you should not try to censor
anybody.
__________________________________________________ ______________

I am not trying to censor you, Clint. I am just highly offended by the use
of the word out of context. It is not a matter of freedom of speech, it is
a matter of decency. You could have easily chosen to use another word to
characterize the pro-code side of this debate and still made your point.
That's all I'm saying.

Arnie -
KT4ST

I am not trying to censor you, Clint. I am just highly offended by the
use
of the word out of context.

but always remember, that is *your* opinion.
I happen to think the analogy is quite accurate.

Clint
KB5ZHT

"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message
...
(4) The public at large (ham radio operators) should NOT
be BURDENED with having to make choices; they
should not have the freedom to choose how to use
thier skills to the ends that they see fit; such is an
IMPOSITION upon them.


By eliminating the testing requirement for Morse code, we are seriously
undermining people's freedom of choice. Choices need to be based on
sufficient knowledge of the subject. Morse code is one of those areas where
a person needs to learn the basics and experience it before they have
sufficient knowledge. Keeping the test means that individuals will have a
better knowledge base upon which to choose whether or not to pursue Morse
code to proficient level. No one is required to use Morse code after
learning it.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"Arnie Macy" wrote in message
...
"Clint" wrote ...

Hey, look your family members certainly have my sympathy for what
happened,
but do not try to use that moral high ground to change and divert the
course
HERE.

I guess freedom of speech, if and only if it doesn't offend? If you really
got that offended by what I said, and this is the last time I will speak
to
you on this matter (period), then block my messages from being downloaded
on
your computer, or do not read them; however, you should not try to censor
anybody.
__________________________________________________ ______________

I am not trying to censor you, Clint. I am just highly offended by the
use
of the word out of context. It is not a matter of freedom of speech, it
is
a matter of decency. You could have easily chosen to use another word to
characterize the pro-code side of this debate and still made your point.
That's all I'm saying.

Arnie -
KT4ST

Arnie,

Unfortunately we have too many people in this country who think freedom of
speech takes precedence over common decency. They don't realize or don't
care that by being inconsiderate in their choice of words or analogies that
people will discount what they say. It is more important to them to do it
their way rather than in a way that will get the audience on their side.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

"Clint" rattlehead at computron dot net wrote in message
...


I am not trying to censor you, Clint. I am just highly offended by the
use
of the word out of context.

but always remember, that is *your* opinion.
I happen to think the analogy is quite accurate.

Clint
KB5ZHT

Visit a Holocaust museum and watch the documentaries on the History channel
for a while and read the transcripts of the Nuremberg trials. See if you
think the analogy is accurate then.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE

Dee D. Flint wrote:
"Arnie Macy" wrote in message
...

"Clint" wrote ...

Hey, look your family members certainly have my sympathy for what

happened,

but do not try to use that moral high ground to change and divert the

course

HERE.

I guess freedom of speech, if and only if it doesn't offend? If you really
got that offended by what I said, and this is the last time I will speak

to

you on this matter (period), then block my messages from being downloaded

on

your computer, or do not read them; however, you should not try to censor
anybody.
________________________________________________ ________________

I am not trying to censor you, Clint. I am just highly offended by the

use

of the word out of context. It is not a matter of freedom of speech, it

is

a matter of decency. You could have easily chosen to use another word to
characterize the pro-code side of this debate and still made your point.
That's all I'm saying.

Arnie -
KT4ST


Arnie,

Unfortunately we have too many people in this country who think freedom of
speech takes precedence over common decency. They don't realize or don't
care that by being inconsiderate in their choice of words or analogies that
people will discount what they say. It is more important to them to do it
their way rather than in a way that will get the audience on their side.

What these free speech hypocrites don't seem to get, is that it works
both ways. While they insist on calling us Nazi's, they consider our
objections and replies to their repulsive comments to be denying them
their free speech. It is not. That is an example of free speech in
action. Everyone has their say. Just as they can call us Nazi's, we can
object.


- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike Coslo wrote in message ...

I liken it to people who watch the televised arguments on Fox news and
others. A half hour of angry people yelling at each other. Eventually
some people think this is the way to conduct all discourse.

When in fact it is just exhhibiting dhildish, boorish, behavior that
just proves that something went amiss when they were being brought up.

- Mike KB3EIA -

Mike, you should have this "discourse" with DICK, Larry, Steve, Bruce,
Kelly, and Dan.

We'll understand and acknowledge that learning has taken place when we
see a change in their behavior.

Thank you in advance for your cooperation.

Brian