"Clint" wrote ...

And how is it he's debating us when he also claims that he's not on one
side OR the other of the issue of CW testing?? HMMM??????? Just HOW is it
he has managed to find a way to eat his cake and have it too when the rest
of humanity in thousands of years have not been able to solve that age old
paradox? HMMM????? And, as far as "cogent and factual", is that before or
after he made a reference to us being pricks?
__________________________________________________ ________________

No, actually he is successfully debating your posting style (or lack
thereof) As to the other comment, I read it as a reference to having a pet
porcupine. Are you a porcupine, Clint?

Arnie -
KT4ST

No, actually he is successfully debating your posting style (or lack
thereof) As to the other comment, I read it as a reference to having a
pet
porcupine. Are you a porcupine, Clint?

Arnie -
KT4ST


bzzzzzt, nice try.

There is no debate on my posting style. Debates include at least two
opposing sides to an issue who are argueing thier points to try to
get an unbiased third party observing to accept thier reasoning.
The debating here that sparked him being planted as an unbiased
third party that nobody is accepting is over cw testing.

And don't think anybody buys the porcupine anology; he already
admitted to having done it as an insult, but tried the explain it
away as humor. You're too late to save him on that one. You
guys may have prearranged this ordeal of his but you haven't
done a good-follow through on coaching one another on
what you're going to say before you post.

Clint