Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Mike Coslo writes:
For those that might be interested, here is some info from the NCVEC proposal: From Part II (Proposal), section 19. (basic framework of the new entry level license) Paragraph d. Power limits. Limit transmitter output power levels to 100 watts on all frequencies below 24 mHz, and 50 watts on all frequencies above 24 mhz. This allows enough power for adequate communication under most circumstances, and matches the nominal power output of the largest number of commercially available transmitters and transceivers available as of this writing. The use of these suggested power levels also removes the necessity for RF safety evaluations, as the power levels are below the stated threshold values for the frequencies concerned. (end paragraph d) Okay, so the NCVEC petition *does* specifically ask for restricted power on their "communicator" class license. Yep - just like I posted here back on March 18. First, I like Carl's note on the name. Novice is so much better. I prefer "Basic". Descriptive, new, fits in the class structure (Basic, General, Extra) and avoids confusion with the existing Novice class. It is a time honored name, and although some may think this superfluous, it looks good in print, and sounds good too. Some folks might thing we're trying to recruit nuns. I like having just two easy to say syllables, instead of 5! Ba-sic Second, there is enough bad about this proposal that I pretty much reject it out of hand. Yep: - No homebrewing from scratch - No rigs with more than 30 volts on the finals - "Signed stament" instead of regs testing 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Wrong S-meter in Hallicrafters SX-28? | Boatanchors | |||
Wrong S-meter in Hallicrafters SX-28? | Boatanchors | |||
WRONG PHONETICS | Dx | |||
GAY BISHOPS: WHAT'S WRONG WITH THAT? | General |