Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jack Twilley wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 "Tom" == garigue writes: [...] Tom Yep with one of those new fangled voice machines. Ugh! You've hit my primary pet peeve with contesting. Tom The above is in response to what one hears in contesting in Tom addition to a lot of bad manners and yes that happens on CW also Tom ergo KI3R does his "needle point" that weekend. Those "voice keyers" annoy me more than anything, even "CW keyers". I felt like jumping into a QSO Party a few weeks ago but *five* different stations had voice keyers calling CQ every thirty seconds and didn't acknowledge my response. Honestly, if you can't talk into the radio for the length of the contest, then maybe you should take a break. Voice keyers in my opinion are just plain wrong. Agreed, I don't like keyers at all. If I made contest rules, they would be outlawed. Get caught using a keyer, and yer out! I've been in contests where the timeing is set so close between CQ's that there isn't time to get in a reply. I suppose the idiot wonders why he's getting no one coming back. hmmm, maybe an op could get mults for turning in keyers! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |