Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old May 1st 04, 05:30 PM
KØHB
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"N2EY" wrote

Not necessarily a good comparison. Conditions during one weekend may
be better, for example.


While one mode or the other may have an advantage due to better
conditions (or whatever) in any single given year, the Nov SS contest
has been run with CW and Phone weekends 14 days apart for many decades
(1st and 3rd weekends of November respectively). Without a SINGLE
exception, the average scores on phone weekends are significantly higher
than on the CW weekends, no exceptions. The reason is that the exchange
is faster on phone than on CW.

73, de Hans, K0HB


  #2   Report Post  
Old May 7th 04, 05:56 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"KØHB" wrote in message ink.net...
"N2EY" wrote

Not necessarily a good comparison. Conditions during one weekend may
be better, for example.


While one mode or the other may have an advantage due to better
conditions (or whatever) in any single given year, the Nov SS contest
has been run with CW and Phone weekends 14 days apart for many decades
(1st and 3rd weekends of November respectively).


Yep.

Without a SINGLE
exception, the average scores on phone weekends are significantly higher
than on the CW weekends, no exceptions.


Did you mean winning scores, Hans? Or did you actually add up all the
scores submitted each year and work out the average? "Average scores"
can mean a lot of different things.

The reason is that the exchange
is faster on phone than on CW.


For a sizable percentage of the participants, that's certainly a
factor. And I'm sure most of them don't repeat back the entire SS
exchange - unlike what I hear so often on Field Day.

There is also the factor that there may be more participants during
the 'phone weekend. Also fewer QRP entries on phone?

A really fun contest regardless of mode. Someday I'll do a sweep...

73 de Jim, N2EY
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions N2EY Policy 165 April 6th 04 07:44 PM
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) Len Over 21 Policy 25 October 20th 03 04:31 AM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? K0HB Policy 68 August 4th 03 02:28 PM
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era Larry Roll K3LT Policy 41 August 2nd 03 07:51 PM
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? Dee D. Flint General 18 July 25th 03 01:13 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017