Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#32
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1 "Anon" == nobody starwars writes: Jack Huh. I'm so glad I'm not an old, bitter, frustrated person. I Jack might run the risk of being a real ham. Anon Age has nothing to do with Dan's personality problems. I've Anon been licensed for 50 years, took all my exams except for the Anon first one (Novice) in front of FCC examiners, but I've moved on Anon since then. Age is not merely a chronological concept, this is so true. Anon Some people sit back and try to live in the past (military days, Anon ham radio license -- whatever) while others continue to Anon anticipate the future. Dan's "real ham" mantra is a plea for Anon respect which arises out of his own insecurity. You're thinking harder about it than I did. Anon I've been there, done that, got the ARRL 35 wpm certificate, and Anon then proceeded to persue other things. It is my belief that ham Anon radio has become quite "uncool" to newbies in these days of the Anon internet, personal computers, Wi-Fi, and the rest of the Anon technology that attracts today's bright kids. I put ham radio Anon on the back burner way back in 1980 when my interests also Anon turned to computers and the Arpanet. I've built my own Anon machines, written operating systems for them, and developed Anon software in persuit of my technical interests. I think that the Anon "real hams" of the 80's did very similar things and enlarged Anon their own worlds beyond the narrow view that the SPST switch Anon throwers (CW dudes) seem to espouse as "real" ham radio. Amateur radio is no longer the cutting edge. I am very happy about that, because most of the time I don't have to worry about poseur ham-wannabe people. The vast majority of the amateurs with whom I interact are grownup, mature, and interested in playing with and learning about radio and other related technologies. I am very happy about that, too. Anon As the other "real hams" left the Dan types behind, they became Anon insecure and increasingly strident. Ignore them. They not only Anon don't matter any more, they are not "real hams" themselves. Anon They are now merely old timers who couldn't keep up. It is a shame that the wealth of experience and knowledge bottled up inside is going to waste. Ah well. Such is life. Jack. (time marches on.) - -- Jack Twilley jmt at twilley dot org http colon slash slash www dot twilley dot org slash tilde jmt slash -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAnCedGPFSfAB/ezgRAt3ZAKC/uVAfJdlqnJ/6K2QZ7kDfzozOegCg4+GJ teFRfmlbFrvxHDp9jww8wc8= =7+mK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |