Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
Len Over 21 wrote: In article , Dave Heil writes: You've told us on numerous occasions all you want to do here. You never seem to get around to doing what you've stated. Now you'd like to tell me all I want to do. I've not stated all I want to do here so your comments are conjecture on your part. Take your pick, Leonard: classical telegraphy, classical SSB, classical AM phone. You aren't doing any of them in amateur radio. You aren't a participant. It seems to me that Lennie's UNaccomplishments in "radio" far exceed anything he MAY have accomplished. And his "word" as to what he says he's going to do is useless. Oh? Did you miss something in the past six years of messaging in here? I've been a professional involved with radio and radio communications. Interesting work. Paid well, too. I've communicated on frequencies you aren't allowed to as a "licensed amateur" or even as a State Department government employee. :-) 1. I wrote "amateur radio". You're drifting off into a description of your past professional radio experience once again. 2. I don't really care where on which frequencies you communicated as a professional. Lennie may be allowed to "communicate" on any number of of DISCREET channels at any one time, and then only as the parameters of the contract he may be presently working on allow. He has never been allowed, and at present will not be allowed, to select the frequency, the mode, or the parameters under which he "operates". You DEMAND amateur radio license acquisition in order to state anything on amateur radio regulations in here. I've DEMANDed nothing. I continue to point out that you have nothing to do with amateur radio as a participant or a regulator. You should make public your "authorization" to make such demands. You should look up the definition of the word "demand". Common sense would dictate that anyone "commenting" on how others "do" something actually have some EXPERIENCE in what they are commenting about. It goes without saying that Lennie has absolutely NO experience in Amateur Radio practice. He can cut-and-paste from various websites all day long about the THEORY of Amateur practice (noting that I am NOT addressing "technical" theory") Without that "authorization" you are just another bitchy whining complainer who can't hack any real discussion beyond the "official" words on amateur-radio-as-it-used-to-was when you first engaged in that hobby. Wrong-o, Pops. I'm a licensed radio amateur. I have a vested interest in any changes in regulations involving amateur radio license testing or amateur radio operation. You, on the other hand... Without that "authorization" you are just another SS-wannabe who wants nothing more than to fight anyone who doesn't agree with your "orders" posted on this bulletin board. In other words, just another disagreeable gunnery nurse (but without bedpan). "Fight"? "Orders"? If we were fighting, you'd best pack a lunch and rest up beforehand, old timer. I haven't issued any orders. Ahhhhh yes...As soon as he's backed into yet another corner, Lennie switches back to making analogies to the Nazis. How predictable. Until you show your "authorization," you'll have to discuss it with the only Real Authority on this newsgroup, Paul Schleck. Hint: he is a licensed radio amateur of Amateur Extra rank. I'll have to discuss what with Paul Schleck? What you seem to want this newsgroup to become is just another Chat Room where like-minded dittyboppers can commiserate in a mental commisary all about "real hams" (who know and love morse code) and follow the League's orders explicitly, complete with all the jargon and standards and practices of 1930's amateur radio. You aren't wrapped very tight. I am wondering what "orders" he refers to, Dave...?!?! I've never received any "directives" or other "orders" from Newington or any League representitive. Meanwhile, this newsgroup is still unmoderated and open to anyone with Internet access. No doubt you will redouble your efforts to put down anyone who doesn't think like you do and DEMAND certain things in order to satisfy your "authorized" orders. Pththththth. No DEMANDs have been made of you, Len. You continue to post. I'll continue to point out your lack of anything to do with amateur radio. You've certainly kept mum about your childlike antics exemplified by some of your comments to the FCC. Wanna discuss those? And he'll continue to post, regardless of how silly or obviously uninformed or ill-prepared his rantings may be. Works for me...Only serves to prove what we've been saying about him all along. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Using a Pool Cage As an Antenna? | Antenna | |||
Use a Pool Cage As An Antenna? | Antenna | |||
The Pool | Policy | |||
From the Extra question pool: The dipole | General | |||
REQ:latest Ham University with curent tech pool willing to share?/sell cheep | Equipment |