N9OGL wrote:
Stebie said

No one, here or on the air, wants to hear the ranting of a
functionally illiterate loudmouth who doesn't think twice about
violating the law when it suits him.

I can talk a Hell of lot better then I can right you ####ing
###hole.

I doubt it. I bet it takes you less than 60 seconds in any
conversation wherein you think you're not getting your way to resort to
the kind of language you let fly in here.

Which is probably why you're finishing up your "college" on-line
over this summer rather than by the deadline that's already passed.

Just how many "fans" do you think you'll create by mimicking
ARRL's "bulletins" on the most crowded Amateur allocation
worldwide...???

Who says I mimicking the ARRL??

You do. Your post on your blog gave topics that were alomost
word-for-word from the ARRL website.

You're the epitome of selfish, Todd.

DAM RIGHT! I didn't get in this hobby for you or any other dumb ####
ham operator, I got into it for my own selfishness.

And when your selfishness degrades my ability to enjoy Amateur
Radio (ie: N9OGL one-way broadcasts on 20 meters), it's no longer a
matter of your OWN "enjoyment.

97.3(a)
(4) Amateur service. "......duly authorized persons interested in
radio
technique solely with a personal aim and without pecuniary interest."

I think the key words to look at steve is "PERSONAL AIM" there is
nothing in the rules stating that I have to listen to what other
amateur say. It dumb ### groups like the ARRL which pushes this
communistic "collectivism" on the amateur radio service. Then there
is
dumb ###es like yourself who believe it.

There you go dissing the ARRL for a running race that they don't
have a horse in...

Steve, K4YZ