Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
From: "an old friend" on Sat 30 Jul 2005 11:20
K4YZ wrote: wrote: Snarly Stebie doesn't do much else in this newsgroup but boast generalities of a non-specific nature while generally insulting everyone who doesn't agree with him. Untrue, but then when has "truth" been your suit, Lennie? entirely true Quod erat demonstrandum...Latin for "it is as demonstrated." Stebie has to begin by snarling and hurling epithets. :-) He has changed his boasting so many times that it is difficult to know what he has actually done or experienced. I haven't been boasting. sure have been boasting about your achivements sayning they are better than Lenn without of course saying what they are [just one N in the short form of my given name...:-) ] Stebie has been "IN" those now-famous "seven hostile actions." Actually, he has been IN military service WHILE those occurred. He has NO presentable proof that he was "IN" those ("in" as being a participant in). That's a good "little white lie" kind of boast, but a BOAST nonetheless. He has BOASTED of his physical prowess in civilian life (flying general aviation aircraft, flying hang-gliders, roller-blading, marching with heavy pack, etc.) while supposedly pulling in medical pension from an early release from service, that supposedly due to an "accident." [accident unspecified] Now, it stands to reason that if one can do all those things as a civilian, he is quite physically capable of completing his "20" (years)...or he is DEFRAUDING the United States government. Granted, the medical examination for a private pilot license is minimal, but a job as a nurse (licensed practical version) requires physical ability to move patients whether in a ward or in the "ER." On the otherhand this post I am replying to is over 300 lines long. So? Now you are trying to ditate how people may express themselves Stebie's whole point in BEING here seems to be his need to SUBJUGATE OTHERS. He LIKES pushing people around plus "having fun" denigrating anyone he feels is "too weak" to reply or has some kind of disadvantage. He wants to make a "name" for himself. In that, he has, but the kind of name he's gotten isn't a good one...:-) Subjugation is a common technique of non-commissioned officers. While that works in recruit depots, it is ten kinds of no-no when used in social or semi-social groups. Snarly Stebie's version of "truth" is whatever he wants to claim on any particular day. He has NO references on any of it. Some examples: Stebie would challenge "call the VA and they can tell you" [all about Stebie's military record] Untrue. You at one time doubted my having served at all. The VA CAN varify that information. You refused, of course...Lot's of excuses...Nothing new there... No Stevie the people who do that but only to a small degree is USAREC in St.Louis MO But they can't verify a claim that you will make spefic enough to even ask about Poor Stebie did a bit of BLUFFING with that "call the VA" claim. One just cannot get such information unless one is in a position such as the personnel or security department of a business. Even so, the information is minimal. There's a couple of public laws on that subject for the armchair lawyers but it is of no matter. One CAN download a standard form from NARA's St. Louis website and send it in by mail. That's still no guarantee that any information WILL be returned nor the extent of that information. At best, one MIGHT get a copy of a DD214 (release from active duty) or other one-page document provided one can supply a social security number, both the requestor's and the person's SSN being queried. In my case, it would be BOTH my ASN and my SSN before they would release anything. [the changeover from service branch specific serial numbers to social security numbers for all branch members began in the 1960s] Big snip In the beginning of Stebie's tirades he mentioned a Medical Discharge that cut his marine career to 18 years (rather than a full 20). He then made that an "Honorable" instead of a medical discharge; if he had gotten that discharge some 5 years before (his alleged time was 1974 to 1992), why would he not have said "honorable" in the beginning? That's all archived, BTW. Well...MOST of it is archived. You've taken some literary license with what was said, but I am sure it's much more colorful in your mind that way. and you admit to this or not? Stebie NEVER admits to anything he is challenged on. :-) What I've written is FROM his own postings in here. Whether or not Google got ALL the archives from DejaNews since 1998 is unknown. It is beside the point, really, one can't spend the whole of one's computer-modem activity re-arguing and re-re- arguing old, old arguments which some sore loser (Stebie) failed to win. Stebie NEVER DOES ANYTHING WRONG in here. :-) Stebie claimed to have been in "seven hostile actions" during his military career, but it seems he is spinning that into the USMC being involved in those...while he was in it. He has no proof at all shown in here that HE was IN any of those hostile actions. That's in newer archives. And we won't discuss any of them. then they are claims without proof, or BYS Stevie lies Stebie is just doing his BLUFFING thing as I remarked on. It works with some people who read some unspecific generalities and half-truths. I've seen others do it elsewhere much better than Stebie, years ago. In fact, with two decades of experience in computer-modem communications (BBSs first, then the Internet), I've seen a LOT of variations on a few themes of boasting and bluffing. [21 years in December of this year] Just like you harrangue Dave Heil over his service in the State Department (all of it fact-based and verifyable), I shant give you the pleasure. You can go ahead and insist "it didn't happen" based upon my refusal to tell you the details, if you care to, but ti still doesn't make it any less factual. just appling YOUR OWN STANDARDS Stevie [Stebie is starting to get stressed, he is making typos and using bad punctuation...:-) ] Tsk, tsk, tsk. In my personal case, I've got reproducible documents (including a reduced size DD214 that I carry for fun in my wallet), photographs (with mimeoed SigC legends on the back), some of the mimeographed order sheets received in three years (xerographed since the acidic paper would make them self- destruct if handled...and copied courtesy of the Burbank, CA, Social Security office), communications with those who were THERE in my unit doing the same work I did, one of whom has had an amateur extra license for a long time. What is worse, I've tried to send a digitized copy of my first First 'Phone license to Stebie and HE REFUSED to accept it. :-) It would seem that Stebie ONLY accepts things that prove HIS case. That's consistent with his newsgroup "battle plan" (or whatever it is for trying to win message points) of MAKING others accept HIS unspecific general claims. Stebie has claimed "working in military radio communications" but isn't at all familiar with the very common (quarter million R/T units made and operational) SINCGARS...(SNIP) Lennie, I guess it's silly to point out to you that SINCGARS is NOT the end-all of radio communications in the Armed Forces. but you know nothing of the system where I a 54E know a afair about them, without having served a commo related MOS. make it very dubious The SINCGARS "family" of R/Ts is now a QUARTER MILLION in number of supplied and operational small-unit radios used by ALL branches (USCG use unknown), primarily for land and land-air tactical communications. They began operational life in 1989, first in Korea. Designed and made by ITT, Fort Wayne, IN, (other production by General Dynamics Land Division now disbanded and reorganized), a QUARTER MILLION radio sets of the same type exceeds every other U.S. military radio set/system in number. Ever. Stebie had five years of his service life to see one, yet is "unfamiliar" with it. [the USMC does indeed use it, is using it now in Iraq and Afghanistan, as is the USA] For that matter, Stebie cannot recall/remember/mention ANY nomenclature of any military radio except some MARS equipment, despite 18 years claimed as a military radio whiz-bang. That's NOT consistent with ANY radio-interested person. [Stebie is unfamiliar with the HF-band AN/PRC-104 manpack in service since 1986 with land forces...nice little "QRP" rig designed and made by Hughes Aircraft Ground systems, operational with USMC and USA] Your 3000th telling of yet another SINCGARS story does not make it any more valuable than any other communications resource...Then, now or in the future. Tsk, tsk. A QUARTER MILLION radio sets is not "significant?" How about a type that has selectable encrypted voice plus selectable frequency hopping...both features making it quite difficult to DF, almost impossible (in the field) to decrypt? It's been in operational use for 16 years and will be (eventually, but soon now) supplanted by the AN/PRC-150 by Harris Corporation. Tsk, only in Stebieworld (at the signpost up ahead) is a foot soldier's secure communication means "insignificant!" :-) At best, Stebie's claims are only for an "Assistant" NCOIC position at a MARS station in Okinawa in the 1980s. MARS stations are NOT a regular part of any service branch radio communications...are, at best, a sort of special services like operation where they MIGHT be used for regular comms in case of catastrophic happenings to the Defense Communication System (DCS). But...but...but...LENNIE! YOU are the one who made the big deal about who runs MARS, etc etc even when it wasn't an issue! more stevie lies True enough, Mark. Poor Stebie made a reply to Hans Brakob writing "Sorry, Hans, MARS IS amateur radio." Brian Burke then picked up on that and chided him. Stebie became outraged and tried three ways from Sunday to rationalize it. I went and looked for the DoD directive on MARS, found it, posted the link, included a short-form history of how MARS came to be (it was 'born' in the U.S. Army before WW2). MARS IS NOT amateur radio but a MILITARY radio service, an auxilliary or "affiliate" (the A in MARS), operates OUTSIDE the U.S. ham bands, has its own callsigns. Amateurs are volunteers for MARS activities. The Army wanted amateur participation in the early radio days prior to WW2 in order to improve its own radio abilities...which were improved, indeed leap-frogged in technology advancement, by commercial firms just prior to the U.S. involvement in WW2. NONE of the pre- or post WW2 military radio communications networks USED MARS for everyday tactical radio comms. During the old Vietnam War times ('Nam ended 30 years ago), it was a definite morale-booster for personal communications to "stateside." There's no need of such morale-boosting service now with the much-improved worldwide military communications such as the DSN and satellite relay. MARS has shifted its focus to become a tertiary communications system in case of catastrophic events for the military but is now active as a liason service to tie together other government communications. That's in very recent archives. Worse yet, it took months for Stebie to acknowledge that the Department of Defense directs MARS, even when given the link to the directive itself available on the Internet at the DoD website. you claimed otherwise Stebie claimed that otherwise. :-) I doubt that Stebie EVER went to the DoD website to find the directive document. Anyone can. It isn't "classified." It was never in question. Lennie is uttering a blatant falsehood every time he repeats this. Lying IS Lennie's forte. This is why Lennie H doesn't get the respect and admiration he THINKS he deserves... Stevie just goes and on dening his own words True enough, Mark. I think Stebie has actual ATTACKS within his own mind where little voices in his head scream "they LIE, they LIE, they LIE!" :-) TRUTH is its own "admiration." TRUTH is "respectable." A continual repetition of "LIE, LIE, LIE" in the face of proof that anyone can view is a sickness on Stebie's part. And the darned ironic thing is that I'm the one who usually jabs Lennie, yet Lennie engages in all these "persoanl insult" diatribes at almost everyone... you must be reading a different Usenet than I am Stevie or be lying or delusional Mark, I'd pick DELUSIONAL. Stebie's flipped out, gone bananas, wigged out (he looks like he's ready for a hairpiece anyway). "The truth is out there..." which is still true even if "X-Files" ceased production. :-) The problem is you, Lennie, and just a few other ner-do-wells who seem to think that what you do is "constructive". yes we think it is constructive to look behind the curtain at the real world That would disturb Stebie's fantasy. He wants the nicely-ordered military-style discipline he is no longer a part of...(SNIP) Wrong. right You can't handle to turth The delusional can only recognize the "truth" existing in their fantasy. They have great difficulty with reality, therefore cling mightily to their fantasy "truths." (UNSNIP)...one where everything is explained and laid-out, no room for deviation from the precise order of things. He can fit into that. However, if the environment changes, he gets very upset and angry. He can't handle disagreements with his opinions, tries to defend himself (no need in normal discussion not about a person) by issuing a series of personal insults directed at his perceived "accuser." Even MORE ironic that I have never addressed you (or anyone) as the "accuser"...that would be a LennieTerm. One that helps to establish "victim status" more Steve evasion, and another lie you have called me on accusing you Stebie attempted some wordplay in there, made like a "victim" of a "false charge." :-) It doesn't work but he doesn't realize it yet. :-) Stebie constantly ACCUSES certain others of heinous things like "LYING!" even though such things are truth. He can no longer separate right from wrong, let alone emerge from fantasy into reality. There is, nor has there ever been, a SINGLE "correct" way of doing things in amateur radio. There's been ONE constant in Amatuer Radio... The license. then why don't and why have you never treated other license holder with any respect? Mark, you just don't fit Stebie's fantasyworld concepts. :-) [note that Stebie misspelled "amateur" as "Amatuer" again, something that is common with his upset/stressed state...] To Stebie, ham radio is ALL about the LICENSE! Not the fun of communicating, not the camaraderie of white male club- house fun, not the interest in the radio hardware, it's the LICENSE! That makes Stebie a SOMEBODY! He's "federally- authorized!" Wow. What a concept! even if I granted you abuse of Lenn on that issue it doesn't explian your treatment of Myself of Todd and of Brain Brian Burke, that is...but you are right, Mark, his comments ARE hypocritical. It's his "PCTA extra Double Standard" hypocrisy operational again...sigh. The one you don't have...The one you CAN'T get. More Libel Steve the second half of the statement is liekly not true and you should know it is likely not true You are right again, Mark. But Stebie is hot and fired-up on his ATTACK mode again...as if any U.S. amateur radio class license is "impossible for me to get." :-) Amateur radio is NOT a military...(SNIP) Your reality is slipping again, Lennie... no he is trying to guess at the nature of your twisted mind No guessing...he's a bit nuts. I was making a comment that U.S. amateur radio is NOT any sort of military service. It isn't. It is a "service" insofar as a service of the government to licensees. The word "service" all throughout Title 47 C.F.R. is as a regulatory term denoting a type and kind of radio use/activity in a particular Part. You really stretch to make these up, don't you..?!?! not at all you seem to act like a drill sgt (whatever the fool marines call the army calls em that), and expect the rest of us are going to fall in Stebie stormed into this newsgroup long ago acting like "super- marine," a regular DILL Sergeant (my term), he of the pursed lips (puckered from too much dill and vinegar) and tried to make all of us who disagreed with him "drop and give me ten!" Along the way his DILL Sergeant campaign hat got all askew and he wound up barking orders to a bunch of blank walls. But, the old rank-status-privilege class consciousness of the old six-class license system suits the ordered, disciplined military psyche. You keep mentioning "military psyche" along with your 1950's-era radio stories, Lennie... yes he does. your point? Actually, Mark, I've mentioned 1960s radio, 1970s radio, 1980s radio, 1990s radio, 2000s radio all along. Stebie tried to MISDIRECT into "blaming his accuser" again. :-) Poor guy still hasn't been able to separate civilian life from military life. He still thinks he is SOME kind of national service through his "amatuer" [sic] radio license. Radio is radio. No, it's not. Not in the APPLICATION. Radio is NOT radio Stevie? my, my you do need your meds He won't take them, Mark. :-) He still thinks that his DILL Sergeant barking can get all those electrons, fields, and waves to do Stebie's bidding. Tsk. The only reason there is licensing in amateur radio is as a regulatory tool for the government, in this case the FCC. All nations do that. Unfortunately, some take this "amatuer" [sic] radio thing as a LIFESTYLE and magnify it far beyond what it is...a hobby. This forum is about AMATEUR RADIO...Not Army, or PLMRS, or GMRS, etc etc etc. then why don't you write about Amateur Radio once and awhile He's having too much fun gabbling and boasting about MARS and CAP and the murines and stuff where he was a SOMEBODY! :-) Big snip. One MUST look at what other radio services are doing. Firstly, amateurs must co-exist in the EM spectrum with all other radio services. We must co-exist in that we do not cause any disruption of service to OTHER radio services. What goes on inside those band edges is a whole different story. IOW we should ignore the technolgies around us and focus on what? Morse Coded OOK CW? Absolutely! Everyone march to the SAME drumbeat! Order! Discipline! Cherish the tradition! Status the Quo! Secondly, other radio services, having (usually) more flexibility in mode type use, can offer insight into possible new methods of communications. But...but...but...LENNIE! YOU are the one who keeps yelling "IT'S JUST A HOBBY!" Where does the FUN of operating radios that are software defined and require almost NO human interaction to make work go...?!?! I on't particular want to work that hard just to make the RADIO go, Id rather spend my time and effort dealing with people at the other end It could be that Stebie wants SDR. That's an acronym for Soft-head Defined Radio. :-) Thirdly, closing off minds to what happens elsewhere and claiming it is "for the good of amateur radio" is a simple cop-out, an excuse NOT to learn, investigate, to enquire about new things, new possibilities; it's a rationale for being LAZY. Lennie...YOU keep repeating that threadbare and untruthful rant over and over, and it's no more true today than when you first sprout it. you operate that way, Jim N2EY is politer about but operates that way True enough. Stebie thinks I am "growing" opinions because they "sprout?" :-) He's a case...mental case growing worse. Terribly fascinating to watch his psychosis develop over the years, much better than classroom learning in psychology. His blabberings are more and more black-and-white, no shades of gray. Emotionally more volatile than a vial of nitroglycerine. :-) nit pik |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Lennie Anderson...Self Destructive Or Just Doesn't Get It...?!?! | Policy | |||
Mode/Band Use in 1961 | Policy | |||
Lennie Steps In His Own Excrement Once Again | Policy | |||
Lennie Makes "Idiot" An Olympic Event | Policy | |||
Lennie's Double Standard Once Again Revealed...BY Lennie! | Policy |