Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

What is fed govt's gig in that hd radio crap? They are bound to be
rakeing in some money, some way or the other.
cuhulin

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

This morning, among some of them scam spam emails was something about
cialis.(of course, I didn't click on it) It said, Eduardo and I can last
forever.
cuhulin

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

dxAce wrote:

dxAce wrote:

David "I can't help but pose as 'Eduardo' because I have no real grip on
reality", wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Weren't you in Traverse City when you'd already claimed to be "living" in
Mexico?

No, that was a summer job at WCCW as board op for the Spanish show from
about 1960 to 1962.

Uh-Huh.

David Eduardo wrote: Hell, also not mentioned was
working all summer at WFAB in
Miami in, I think, 1961. It was the sister station of where I
worked in Cleveland,
and I wanted to be there as it was a Spanish language
station! I also worked
summer of '59 and '60 if I remember the years at WCCW
in Traverse City, ...

Also amazing, as I've pointed out many times before, is that just around the same
time you claimed to be in South America, miraculously, in a discussion about John
F. Kennedy's assasination, you claimed to be working at a radio station in the USA
on November 22, 1963.

Mr. David Frackelton Gleason, you are hilarious!

I'm LMFAO

dxAce
Michigan
USA

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Sep 6, 12:09 pm, dxAce wrote:
David "I can't help but pose as 'Eduardo' because I have no real grip on

reality", wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Weren't you in Traverse City when you'd already claimed to be
"living" in
Mexico?

No, that was a summer job at WCCW as board op for the Spanish show from
about 1960 to 1962.

Uh-Huh.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

That's not the first time he's been caught in a lie. He also lied
about his job title.


No, the NAB published it wrong... the fact being that whatever it was listed
as, I was on a panel of the corporate programming heads of five of the US'
largest broadcasters. Nobody there even cared what the exact title was. Only
dxAss and you seem to think it is of any significance.

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

"D Peter Maus" wrote in message
...
David Eduardo wrote:

The main reason advertisers do not target 55+ customers is that the
return on investment is low; it takes so much more advertising to
convince older consumers that the cost of the sale is less than the
profit on the sale.

You think that may have something to do with the way the sale is
presented?

I have to cut you off right here. Radio stations don't present to agency
clients. They present to media buyers at ad agencies, based on the
specifications those agencies have for each buy. The amount per market for
radio, the number of stations, the demos, etc., were determined way before
the call for rates gets out, and generaly stations don't even know a
campaign is being prepared until it reaches the buying stage.

It's real simple. Tell the truth. Stop the hype, and just tell the
truth. You'll find that there are a lot of us out there who will respond
to that...and selling to us is easier than getting a morning erection.

The truth is that agency buys have the ages and budgets set by the client,
and a single radio station... even a group of them... has generally no
contact with the client. The ad agency carries out the client's marketing
plan, which probably was done after spending a lot of money on research and
product development.

Ad woe to the station that tries to contact an agency client directly to
have a buy changed. That will likely be the last time the station ever gets
any business from that agency. In fact, it is generally considered unethical
to call on an agency client, and viewed as tortuous interference with the
client-agency relationship.

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


No, that was a summer job at WCCW as board op for the Spanish show from
about 1960 to 1962.

Uh-Huh.

David Eduardo wrote: Hell, also not mentioned was
working all summer at WFAB in
Miami in, I think, 1961

I never worked at WFAB. I visited it on a spring break, once, for a day. The
gifts of a box of Cuban music LPs furthered my interest in Latin music.

. It was the sister station of where I
worked in Cleveland,
and I wanted to be there as it was a Spanish language
station! I also worked
summer of '59 and '60 if I remember the years at WCCW
in Traverse City, ...

Correct. It is possible to have more than one part time job during a year...
maybe, as an unemployed person this is hard for you to understand. I know
DJs from the 60's and 70's who worked in three different markets in a year
and maybe did 20 stations in a 30 year career... it's not unusual in 60's
and 70's radio.

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


dxAce wrote:

dxAce wrote:

David "I can't help but pose as 'Eduardo' because I have no real grip
on
reality", wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


Weren't you in Traverse City when you'd already claimed to be
"living" in
Mexico?

No, that was a summer job at WCCW as board op for the Spanish show
from
about 1960 to 1962.

Uh-Huh.

David Eduardo wrote: Hell, also not mentioned was
working all summer at WFAB in
Miami in, I think, 1961. It was the sister station of where I
worked in Cleveland,
and I wanted to be there as it was a Spanish language
station! I also worked
summer of '59 and '60 if I remember the years at WCCW
in Traverse City, ...

Also amazing, as I've pointed out many times before, is that just around
the same
time you claimed to be in South America, miraculously, in a discussion
about John
F. Kennedy's assasination, you claimed to be working at a radio station in
the USA
on November 22, 1963.

You really need to improve your reading skills. In the first part of '63, I
was in Mexico and then wandered about Central America and Colombia. I was
back at WCUY briefly in late 1963, and then went to Guatemala briefly and
then to Ecuador. If you follow the timeline, it's relatively simple.

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

On Sep 6, 10:11 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message

...



No, that was a summer job at WCCW as board op for the Spanish show from
about 1960 to 1962.

Uh-Huh.

David Eduardo wrote: Hell, also not mentioned was
working all summer at WFAB in
Miami in, I think, 1961

I never worked at WFAB. I visited it on a spring break, once, for a day. The
gifts of a box of Cuban music LPs furthered my interest in Latin music.

. It was the sister station of where I
worked in Cleveland,
and I wanted to be there as it was a Spanish language
station! I also worked
summer of '59 and '60 if I remember the years at WCCW
in Traverse City, ...

Correct. It is possible to have more than one part time job during a year...
maybe, as an unemployed person this is hard for you to understand. I know
DJs from the 60's and 70's who worked in three different markets in a year
and maybe did 20 stations in a 30 year career... it's not unusual in 60's
and 70's radio.

LOL...it's also possible to be caught in a baldfaced lie.

Again.

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

In article . com,
Steve wrote:

On Sep 6, 11:45 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message

..
.

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

This is not a typo. You do not understand the technical terms you use.
You do not understand what 10 mV/m means. They are just terms you have
read and regurgitate with no understanding of what they mean.

http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/MB/Da...rns/504736-700...
has a typical FCC filing plot for a directional antenna system for KTLK in
Los Angeles from its proposed Downey site. Note that the radiation pattern
is defined by the electric field strength (commonly referred to just as
"field strength" throughout part 73 of the rules) at one kilometer in mV/m.

Using ground conductivity, either from the FCC map or from a "test station"
measurement of more specific local conductivity variations, the theoretical
signal strength can be calculated. A typical use of mapping of the contours
is to determine interference referent to co-channel and adjacent channel
stations for the purpose of new or change applications, and to create
coverage maps of radio stations for sales purposes or for appraisals by
brokers or investors.

In addition, night operation has a definition of the interference free
contour, which varies from station to station. KTNQ in Los Angeles has an
interference free night contour of approximately 9 mv/m; this value is
determined by the calculation of skywave from other co-channel stations to
give a usable groundwave service contour for the station. In other words,
outside the 9 mv/m contour, the signal is subject to regular skywave
interference to the groundwave signal. That would be 79.084 dBu for a 9
mV/m
signal.

See, I told you he'd be incoherent.

I'll just have to keep asking until he answers the question.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

Ibiquity's "Gag Order" on engineers
 

In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

"Telamon" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote:

This is not a typo. You do not understand the technical terms you use.
You do not understand what 10 mV/m means. They are just terms you have
read and regurgitate with no understanding of what they mean.

http://www.fcc.gov/ftp/Bureaus/MB/Da...4736-70030.pdf
has a typical FCC filing plot for a directional antenna system for KTLK in
Los Angeles from its proposed Downey site. Note that the radiation pattern
is defined by the electric field strength (commonly referred to just as
"field strength" throughout part 73 of the rules) at one kilometer in mV/m.

This is the closest you have come to answering the question. Again, in
your own words what does "field strength" in mV/m mean? What is it
actually a measure of? What does this measurement represent?

Using ground conductivity, either from the FCC map or from a "test station"
measurement of more specific local conductivity variations, the theoretical
signal strength can be calculated. A typical use of mapping of the contours
is to determine interference referent to co-channel and adjacent channel
stations for the purpose of new or change applications, and to create
coverage maps of radio stations for sales purposes or for appraisals by
brokers or investors.

A measurement of "field strength" in mV/m does not sound like a
demographic to me.

In addition, night operation has a definition of the interference free
contour, which varies from station to station. KTNQ in Los Angeles has an
interference free night contour of approximately 9 mv/m; this value is
determined by the calculation of skywave from other co-channel stations to
give a usable groundwave service contour for the station. In other words,
outside the 9 mv/m contour, the signal is subject to regular skywave
interference to the groundwave signal. That would be 79.084 dBu for a 9 mV/m
signal.

How does 79.084 dBu compares to 9 mV/m? What is this dBu term? Please
explain what this means other than it being some line on a map. What
does this measurement mean for my radio reception?

--
Telamon
Ventura, California