Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Eduardo" wrote:
And an FM can not provide the needed service in the Minneapolis case? [...] FMs are highly viable still; with few exceptions, AMs are not. People listened for content. You and your buddies at iBiquity have destroyed the quality -- what there was -- of the remaining content. Most people are now listening to their digial audio players, not to the FMs. They won't get the news. -- Eric F. Richards, "It's the Din of iBiquity." -- Frank Dresser |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote: And an FM can not provide the needed service in the Minneapolis case? [...] FMs are highly viable still; with few exceptions, AMs are not. People listened for content. You and your buddies at iBiquity have destroyed the quality -- what there was -- of the remaining content. Most people are now listening to their digial audio players, not to the FMs. They won't get the news. How has iBiquity destroyed the quality of FM? There is no degradation of the FM analog signal to add HD, and saying so is an exaggeration or a lie. Most people, as in 96% of them, are listening to the radio each week.... same as 1965 when Arbiytron began. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 3:19 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Eric F. Richards" wrote in messagenews:rsiuf3hvji3vahsfoik55m05b39ko3e71i@4ax .com... "David Eduardo" wrote: And an FM can not provide the needed service in the Minneapolis case? [...] FMs are highly viable still; with few exceptions, AMs are not. People listened for content. You and your buddies at iBiquity have destroyed the quality -- what there was -- of the remaining content. Most people are now listening to their digial audio players, not to the FMs. They won't get the news. How has iBiquity destroyed the quality of FM? There is no degradation of the FM analog signal to add HD, and saying so is an exaggeration or a lie. Most people, as in 96% of them, are listening to the radio each week.... same as 1965 when Arbiytron began. Good luck stopping the internet, Tardo. You have a lot of work to do. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve wrote: How has iBiquity destroyed the quality of FM? There is no degradation of the FM analog signal to add HD, and saying so is an exaggeration or a lie. Most people, as in 96% of them, are listening to the radio each week.... same as 1965 when Arbitron began. Good luck stopping the internet, Tardo. You have a lot of work to do. There's no need. The internet and tradional broadcast radio/tv can coexist. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 30, 11:35 am, SFTV_troy wrote:
Steve wrote: How has iBiquity destroyed the quality of FM? There is no degradation of the FM analog signal to add HD, and saying so is an exaggeration or a lie. Most people, as in 96% of them, are listening to the radio each week.... same as 1965 when Arbitron began. Good luck stopping the internet, Tardo. You have a lot of work to do. There's no need. The internet and tradional broadcast radio/tv can coexist. Internet radio will eliminate the need for outdated modes of broadcasting. You can't fight progress. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve wrote: On Sep 30, 11:35 am, SFTV_troy wrote: There's no need. The internet and tradional broadcast radio/tv can coexist. Internet radio will eliminate the need for outdated modes of broadcasting. You can't fight progress. You can't fight consumer desire either. Just because YOU think internet transmission is better doesn't mean the People will agree. Look at the colossal failure called WebTV ("bring internet to your set"). Consumers ignored it. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David Eduardo wrote: "Eric F. Richards" wrote in message People listened for content. You and your buddies at iBiquity have destroyed the quality -- what there was -- of the remaining content. Most people are now listening to their digial audio players, not to the FMs. They won't get the news. How has iBiquity destroyed the quality of FM? There is no degradation of the FM analog signal to add HD, and saying so is an exaggeration or a lie. I'd call it a "lie". I still listen to FM, driving across the country on business trips, and I hear absolutely NO degradation in the signal. (I wouldn't even know HD exists, if it weren't for the ads.) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
WTT.. Radio Shack 2039 Scanner. NEW TEKK DATA Radio. FOR Green Military radio. OR 2 mtr HT | Swap |