Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Dresser wrote:
"Telamon" wrote in message ... [snip] Is that would be the vaporware chip-set and the BS software? Oh, set us straight on the details with some links please. It would seem, in the HD radio biz, that no plan happens until it happens. From about a year ago: "RadioGuard-capable radio receivers are planned to be introduced to the market by the holidays." http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/ibiquity-to-int.html Frank Dresser Not also, in direct conflict to David's denial, that the conditional access specifically includes subscription access to audio content. This passage particularly says it all: "We believe this will be key for monetizing HD Radio," said Tom Rucktenwald, director of data applications security for NDS. Services that could be made possible through RadioGuard include pay-per-listen options for live concerts or other events, improved reading services for the blind, private channels for emergency services, and free opt-in events sponsored by advertisers. So HD Radio will not just be competing with satellite radio Siriusly-Speaking May-07 for listening time, but soon will be competing for subscription dollars as well. You'd think he'd get the message: We're not buying it. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "D Peter Maus" wrote in message news ![]() Frank Dresser wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message ... [snip] Is that would be the vaporware chip-set and the BS software? Oh, set us straight on the details with some links please. It would seem, in the HD radio biz, that no plan happens until it happens. From about a year ago: "RadioGuard-capable radio receivers are planned to be introduced to the market by the holidays." http://www.orbitcast.com/archives/ibiquity-to-int.html Frank Dresser Not also, in direct conflict to David's denial, that the conditional access specifically includes subscription access to audio content. I've never heard of pay per program or pay per channel propositions; the ability of even a cluster of several stations to garner subscriptions looks bleak. When you can get channels at about a dime each on satellite, that means that the HD's of one company would be worth less than a buck a month... and the processing charges would eat most of that. There does not seem to be a viable model, while FMeXtra is on with hundreds of channels in SCA-like subscriptions with locked receivers... I know of one LA station renting facilities to two Chinese broadcasts and one in Japanese under FMeXtra. There does not look to be a viable business model for HD pay channels for audio services, although data services may create revenue. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Eduardo - Arbitron ratings are a farce, too! | Shortwave | |||
Q for Eduardo - Does Arbitron monitor non-commercial? | Shortwave | |||
"Study: HD Radio's 'Tepid Growth Story'" - Ha! Ha! Eduardo & RHF! | Shortwave | |||
arbitron summaries | Broadcasting |