Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:20 -0700, John Smith
wrote: On 4/26/2011 6:58 AM, raven1 wrote: ... Do you wonder why most people regard Conspiracy Theorists as nuts? Really? Yes, actually. To tell you the truth, the motives behind any crime I have ever seen in life is/are drugs, money, power, wealth and rock and roll ... And you think which was the motive here? Criminals can keep coming up with a range of bizarre "motives", I find this humorous ... but sad. Regards, JS The facts and data surrounding Waco only prepared us for the future crimes. How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. The next false flag operation may enslave us, or set of a real revolution. It only depends if enough know what has been going on. A single video, waco rules of engagement, pushes Waco far above a simple conspiracy! Regards, JS |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/26/2011 10:13 AM, raven1 wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:20 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 6:58 AM, raven1 wrote: ... Do you wonder why most people regard Conspiracy Theorists as nuts? Really? Yes, actually. To tell you the truth, the motives behind any crime I have ever seen in life is/are drugs, money, power, wealth and rock and roll ... And you think which was the motive here? Criminals can keep coming up with a range of bizarre "motives", I find this humorous ... but sad. Regards, JS The facts and data surrounding Waco only prepared us for the future crimes. How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. The next false flag operation may enslave us, or set of a real revolution. It only depends if enough know what has been going on. A single video, waco rules of engagement, pushes Waco far above a simple conspiracy! Regards, JS You are stuck in a circular argument, the evidence prove Waco a crime, a lot of the evidence has been pointed out here, bullets, CS gas, tanks/fires, filmed shooting of fleeing Waco victims, bull dozing of evidence, etc. As I pointed out, anyone watching Waco Rules of Engagement will have this pointed out to them. Regards, JS |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:20:01 -0700, John Smith
wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:13 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:20 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 6:58 AM, raven1 wrote: ... Do you wonder why most people regard Conspiracy Theorists as nuts? Really? Yes, actually. To tell you the truth, the motives behind any crime I have ever seen in life is/are drugs, money, power, wealth and rock and roll ... And you think which was the motive here? Criminals can keep coming up with a range of bizarre "motives", I find this humorous ... but sad. Regards, JS The facts and data surrounding Waco only prepared us for the future crimes. How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. The next false flag operation may enslave us, or set of a real revolution. It only depends if enough know what has been going on. A single video, waco rules of engagement, pushes Waco far above a simple conspiracy! Regards, JS You are stuck in a circular argument, the evidence prove Waco a crime, a lot of the evidence has been pointed out here, bullets, CS gas, tanks/fires, filmed shooting of fleeing Waco victims, bull dozing of evidence, etc. As I pointed out, anyone watching Waco Rules of Engagement will have this pointed out to them. Non-responsive answer duly noted. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/26/2011 10:54 AM, raven1 wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:20:01 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:13 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:20 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 6:58 AM, raven1 wrote: ... Do you wonder why most people regard Conspiracy Theorists as nuts? Really? Yes, actually. To tell you the truth, the motives behind any crime I have ever seen in life is/are drugs, money, power, wealth and rock and roll ... And you think which was the motive here? Criminals can keep coming up with a range of bizarre "motives", I find this humorous ... but sad. Regards, JS The facts and data surrounding Waco only prepared us for the future crimes. How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. The next false flag operation may enslave us, or set of a real revolution. It only depends if enough know what has been going on. A single video, waco rules of engagement, pushes Waco far above a simple conspiracy! Regards, JS You are stuck in a circular argument, the evidence prove Waco a crime, a lot of the evidence has been pointed out here, bullets, CS gas, tanks/fires, filmed shooting of fleeing Waco victims, bull dozing of evidence, etc. As I pointed out, anyone watching Waco Rules of Engagement will have this pointed out to them. Non-responsive answer duly noted. Ignoring morons is one of my specialties ... Regards, JS |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:56:18 -0700, John Smith
wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:54 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:20:01 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:13 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:20 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 6:58 AM, raven1 wrote: ... Do you wonder why most people regard Conspiracy Theorists as nuts? Really? Yes, actually. To tell you the truth, the motives behind any crime I have ever seen in life is/are drugs, money, power, wealth and rock and roll ... And you think which was the motive here? Criminals can keep coming up with a range of bizarre "motives", I find this humorous ... but sad. Regards, JS The facts and data surrounding Waco only prepared us for the future crimes. How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. The next false flag operation may enslave us, or set of a real revolution. It only depends if enough know what has been going on. A single video, waco rules of engagement, pushes Waco far above a simple conspiracy! Regards, JS You are stuck in a circular argument, the evidence prove Waco a crime, a lot of the evidence has been pointed out here, bullets, CS gas, tanks/fires, filmed shooting of fleeing Waco victims, bull dozing of evidence, etc. As I pointed out, anyone watching Waco Rules of Engagement will have this pointed out to them. Non-responsive answer duly noted. Ignoring morons is one of my specialties ... I note that this is the third time you've evaded answering the same question. If you're unable or unwilling to defend your position, why bother posting? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/26/2011 11:42 AM, raven1 wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:56:18 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:54 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:20:01 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:13 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:20 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 6:58 AM, raven1 wrote: ... Do you wonder why most people regard Conspiracy Theorists as nuts? Really? Yes, actually. To tell you the truth, the motives behind any crime I have ever seen in life is/are drugs, money, power, wealth and rock and roll ... And you think which was the motive here? Criminals can keep coming up with a range of bizarre "motives", I find this humorous ... but sad. Regards, JS The facts and data surrounding Waco only prepared us for the future crimes. How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. The next false flag operation may enslave us, or set of a real revolution. It only depends if enough know what has been going on. A single video, waco rules of engagement, pushes Waco far above a simple conspiracy! Regards, JS You are stuck in a circular argument, the evidence prove Waco a crime, a lot of the evidence has been pointed out here, bullets, CS gas, tanks/fires, filmed shooting of fleeing Waco victims, bull dozing of evidence, etc. As I pointed out, anyone watching Waco Rules of Engagement will have this pointed out to them. Non-responsive answer duly noted. Ignoring morons is one of my specialties ... I note that this is the third time you've evaded answering the same question. If you're unable or unwilling to defend your position, why bother posting? Yes, it has already been stated ... Waco Rules of Engagement covers all well ... Regards, JS |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 11:47:50 -0700, John Smith
wrote: On 4/26/2011 11:42 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:56:18 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:54 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:20:01 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:13 AM, raven1 wrote: On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 09:46:20 -0700, John wrote: On 4/26/2011 6:58 AM, raven1 wrote: ... Do you wonder why most people regard Conspiracy Theorists as nuts? Really? Yes, actually. To tell you the truth, the motives behind any crime I have ever seen in life is/are drugs, money, power, wealth and rock and roll ... And you think which was the motive here? Criminals can keep coming up with a range of bizarre "motives", I find this humorous ... but sad. Regards, JS The facts and data surrounding Waco only prepared us for the future crimes. How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. The next false flag operation may enslave us, or set of a real revolution. It only depends if enough know what has been going on. A single video, waco rules of engagement, pushes Waco far above a simple conspiracy! Regards, JS You are stuck in a circular argument, the evidence prove Waco a crime, a lot of the evidence has been pointed out here, bullets, CS gas, tanks/fires, filmed shooting of fleeing Waco victims, bull dozing of evidence, etc. As I pointed out, anyone watching Waco Rules of Engagement will have this pointed out to them. Non-responsive answer duly noted. Ignoring morons is one of my specialties ... I note that this is the third time you've evaded answering the same question. If you're unable or unwilling to defend your position, why bother posting? Yes, it has already been stated ... If by "stated" you mean "evaded" perhaps. Waco Rules of Engagement covers all well ... In another post in this thread, you provided three links, one of which discounted the credibility of the other two, so forgive me if I'm unconvinced that any citation you give will cover everything well. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 4/26/2011 10:13 AM, raven1 wrote:
... How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. ... If you really must pose such imbecilic questions, you probably missed the importance of potty training ... don't bother the adults here, go home and ask your mother ... Asking sideways questions ... Regards, JS |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Apr 2011 10:55:37 -0700, John Smith
wrote: On 4/26/2011 10:13 AM, raven1 wrote: ... How so? No, really, I'm interested in your "logic" here. ... If you really must pose such imbecilic questions, you probably missed the importance of potty training ... don't bother the adults here, go home and ask your mother ... Asking sideways questions ... You are apparently unwilling or unable to answer a direct question. That doesn't help your credibility. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|