On Jun 18, 10:51*pm, Colanth wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:38:10 -0700, Bob Casanova
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:
Working for the government or even privet industry
Hedge funds?

Gotten by selling grass?
--
"Integrity has no need for rules" - Albert Camus

Some types of privet may be poisonous .

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:08:40 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 18, 10:38*am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:









On Jun 17, 9:21 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:23:41 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 16, 10:04 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 15, 12:06 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously
you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have
uncovered.

Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he
thinks. Too bad I don't.

I see that you still quote dead people

McCoy is dead? Cite?

[Crickets...]

Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you
don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your
comment intended to convey?

, perhaps because they can't
refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler
appreciated redneck folks like yourself.

I see that you still refuse to provide any requested
information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms
and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your
choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL.
If I posted a link...

...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of
your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity;
only the content of the cited link can do that).

snip irrelevancies
You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything
that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies.
In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise
government approved, or else it doesn't matter. So, what's your real
point or objective?

My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a
request for information from you, information which you
refuse to provide.

Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that
wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others?

Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things
that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others";
that's what engineering is all about.

And I'm still waiting for that info from you.
In other words, you cant admit to anything that was truly yours.

Missed the part about "before I retired I developed several
things that weren't 'already proven and/or accepted by
others'; that's what engineering is all about.", did you? No
surprise; you seem to ignore anything which doesn't support
your personal agenda; you're identical to many other loons
in this way.

And I'm still waiting for those definitions you refuse to
provide:

"FUD" or "FUD-master"
"ZNR"
"redneck" (your personal definition, that is; I know the
actual meaning).

Have fun tapdancing around them again.
So you still can't admit to anything that was all you, or even tell us
the date and place of whatever you were specifically any part of.

Since it was involved with technical information about
testing of electronic systems, you wouldn't be able to
follow the details anyway, so I won't waste my time.

Working for the government or even privet industry

Hedge funds?

that essentially
provides everything and otherwise pays for everything and thereby owns
all the rights to everything you've ever accomplished is not hardly
the same thing as accomplishing anything on your own, now is it.

Ah, additional tapdancing and goalpost sprints.

HANL.

Yes, as per usual corrupt hedge funds fits your closed mindset

WHOOOSSHHHHH!

snip Bradiocies
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:51:21 -0400, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Colanth :

On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:38:10 -0700, Bob Casanova
wrote:

On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

Working for the government or even privet industry

Hedge funds?

Gotten by selling grass?

Bush era.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless