Potential for Volcanic Activity in Salton Sea.
http://www.standeyo.com

Sallton Sea, in Southern (not SoCal, how come they don't use Proper
Language over there? They have their own Schtick going on.They say yew
for you, tew for two, it's Weird)) California.
Let er (Volcano) RIP!
cuhulin

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth wrote:

On Jun 12, 3:19*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :









On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. *When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless

So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.



No Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”, you missed the
message completely!

The message was... you were asked a question. Sane people, when asked a
question, respond with an answer, not an assertion.

Please try again.

We now know what FUD is.

What is ZNR (I seem to remember it's something about Zionists and Nazis)?

Who is William Mook?

And why should anyone care?

Shill #2
--
Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round...
theobviousgcashman

On Jun 11, 10:50*pm, BDK wrote:
In article 1ab09b17-2565-4ed9-ac3b-521ea9d4f735
@q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com, says...

Atomic spaceships sounds like one of guballs previous net incarnations

That wouldn't surprise me a bit. I wonder if Brad believes in a
perpetual motion machine?

Don't write off the concept just yet. Perpetual bull****
machines already exist, as exemplified by the bible /
koran / other holy book of your choice.

On Jun 12, 1:01*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

The folks that I've worked for (including most current clients have
often been Jewish and/or otherwise devoutly faith-based because it
helps them deal with everyday matters and self improvement issues),

IOW, it's a crutch. If you had the balls, you'd tell them.

know that I'm outspoken and critical about mainstream religion and
politics,

Just mainstream? Why not the rest of it?

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 12, 3:19*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :









On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. *When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]

So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

On Jun 13, 9:42*am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:









On Jun 12, 3:19*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. *When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. *Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless

Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously
you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have
uncovered.

I see that you still quote dead people, perhaps because they can't
refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler
appreciated redneck folks like yourself.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:26:56 -0400, BDK wrote:

In article 7869df2d-bcbc-41d0-bed3-d190b7f45024
, says...

On Jun 16, 8:51*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 15, 2:06*pm, Government Shill #2 wrote:









On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT), george wrote:
On Jun 15, 8:42*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 14, 12:59*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
Silly boy. *You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. *Obviously
you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have
uncovered.

Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he
thinks. Too bad I don't.

I see that you still quote dead people

McCoy is dead? Cite?

, perhaps because they can't
refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. *At least Hitler
appreciated redneck folks like yourself.

I see that you still refuse to provide any requested
information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms
and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your
choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless

If I posted a link or cite to the holy grail, you'd find a way of
disqualifying it.

Can you or BDK prove or document to me that either of you have ever
helped another soul on Earth?

Decoder ring time here.
WTF is he on about

A standard decoder ring won't work. This is High Babblelooonian. You need a
Guth-o-mat 9000 Babble Decoder for Brad's stuff.



Did that FUD-master brain fart smell as good as it felt?

Did babble FUD-babble babble babble babble babble babble? [brown
smell]

Damn! Now my Guth-o-mat 9000 has packed it in.

Shill #2

The 9000 is garbage, the 9100 is better, but you can't enter more than a
couple of sentences, or it starts to overload.

If I can get another ALL CAPs bonus from |-|erc, I'm going to put a down payment
on a Guth-o-mat Ultimate Deluxe. That should fix it.

Shill #2
--
Pay Section
Disinformation Directorate
Ministry of Information
Antipodean Division

On Jun 16, 7:19*pm, Government Shill #2 wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:26:56 -0400, BDK wrote:
In article 7869df2d-bcbc-41d0-bed3-d190b7f45024
, says...

On Jun 16, 8:51 am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 15, 2:06 pm, Government Shill #2 wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT), george wrote:
On Jun 15, 8:42 am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously
you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have
uncovered.

Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he
thinks. Too bad I don't.

I see that you still quote dead people

McCoy is dead? Cite?

, perhaps because they can't
refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler
appreciated redneck folks like yourself.

I see that you still refuse to provide any requested
information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms
and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your
choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

If I posted a link or cite to the holy grail, you'd find a way of
disqualifying it.

Can you or BDK prove or document to me that either of you have ever
helped another soul on Earth?

Decoder ring time here.
WTF is he on about

A standard decoder ring won't work. This is High Babblelooonian. You need a
Guth-o-mat 9000 Babble Decoder for Brad's stuff.

Did that FUD-master brain fart smell as good as it felt?

Did babble FUD-babble babble babble babble babble babble? [brown
smell]

Damn! Now my Guth-o-mat 9000 has packed it in.

Shill #2

The 9000 is garbage, the 9100 is better, but you can't enter more than a
couple of sentences, or it starts to overload.

If I can get another ALL CAPs bonus from |-|erc, I'm going to put a down payment
on a Guth-o-mat Ultimate Deluxe. That should fix it.

No. By the time that happens guths one lonely brain cell will have
given up the ghost

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 15, 12:06*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:









On Jun 14, 12:59*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
Silly boy. *You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. *Obviously
you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have
uncovered.

Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he
thinks. Too bad I don't.

I see that you still quote dead people

McCoy is dead? Cite?

[Crickets...]

Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you
don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your
comment intended to convey?

, perhaps because they can't
refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. *At least Hitler
appreciated redneck folks like yourself.

I see that you still refuse to provide any requested
information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms
and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your
choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL.
If I posted a link...

...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of
your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity;
only the content of the cited link can do that).

snip irrelevancies

You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything
that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies.
In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise
government approved, or else it doesn't matter. So, what's your real
point or objective?

My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a
request for information from you, information which you
refuse to provide.

Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that
wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others?

Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things
that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others";
that's what engineering is all about.

And I'm still waiting for that info from you.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless

On 16 Jun, 00:26, BDK wrote:
In article 7869df2d-bcbc-41d0-bed3-d190b7f45024
@r27g2000prr.googlegroups.com, says...











On Jun 16, 8:51*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 15, 2:06*pm, Government Shill #2 wrote:

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT), george wrote:
On Jun 15, 8:42*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 14, 12:59*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :

On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]
So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
Silly boy. *You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. *Obviously
you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have
uncovered.

Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he
thinks. Too bad I don't.

I see that you still quote dead people

McCoy is dead? Cite?

, perhaps because they can't
refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. *At least Hitler
appreciated redneck folks like yourself.

I see that you still refuse to provide any requested
information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms
and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your
choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless

If I posted a link or cite to the holy grail, you'd find a way of
disqualifying it.

Can you or BDK prove or document to me that either of you have ever
helped another soul on Earth?

Decoder ring time here.
WTF is he on about

A standard decoder ring won't work. This is High Babblelooonian. You need a
Guth-o-mat 9000 Babble Decoder for Brad's stuff.

Did that FUD-master brain fart smell as good as it felt?

Did babble FUD-babble babble babble babble babble babble? [brown
smell]

Damn! Now my Guth-o-mat 9000 has packed it in.

Shill #2

The 9000 is garbage, the 9100 is better, but you can't enter more than a
couple of sentences, or it starts to overload.

--
BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running!

the bell rings, the sergeant-major all ATAQUEEEEEEEEE screams, is a
bustling, young people who are in training do not know what to do, the
more experienced now begin to prepare for battle, the young do not
know where we are weapons they will fight, nor the sergeant's
attention to them, what we do say, let's say another behind the
sergeant, then where will the troops for the sergeant and the sergeant
right now enters a reserved spot, and Younger people are standing in
front of the door, when the sergeant comes out and the guy with 200
young people, he says the first serious, MY SON IF YOU WANT TO GO
FIRST ONE WAS NOT NEEDED TO TALK DELETE.

The king with great regret sending a messenger to the central kingdom
of the emperor-king Kalucine, he commands the union of the imperial
kingdoms and was prepared to fight the nomads, however, it was
necessary to warn him about the message of the nomads.
The messenger arrives and is announced, the emperor-king readily
receives the message and shouted:
-Get my horse! I have to make a trip now! Royal Guard!
"Yes sir, a man yells of noble and lofty-We are at your disposal!
The horses run faster than the wind and soon the emperor-king reaches
the kingdom of the border, the kings meet with advisors and the royal
guard, a subject so important that even the queen can hear ...