Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() yes, it is a lot easier to learn morse now than in the past; you can download W1AW practice files to your computer and as mp3 files; you can get software that will not only drill you on morse characters, but identify your weaknesses and provide specific instruction on those problem character patterns, and so on. There are even programs that simulate contest and noisy reception and "lousy" sending, so you don't get thrown off by actual operating conditions ;-) the latest QST magazine has an article on the aging of the USA ham population; and that only 3% of those randomly surveyed were under 30-35 yrs(!) ;-( Code use had dropped from half to about a third, which helps explain the relatively fewer cw signals I am hearing these days (thought it must be my hearing, or the QRN static, but it looks like lower morse activity, switching to PSK31 packet etc. ;-) ;-) grins bobm -- ************************************************** ********************* * Robert Monaghan POB 752182 Southern Methodist Univ. Dallas Tx 75275 * ********************Standard Disclaimers Apply************************* |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message link.net... "Zaphon B." wrote: And, yes, Morse code (Or CW, as hams like to call it), Oh, Oh, I know, I've got one, how come CW? MC not good enough for all those hams? :0) Zaphod Captain Grundig Rules...Nuff said. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Zaphon B." wrote: "Stephen M.H. Lawrence" wrote in message link.net... "Zaphon B." wrote: And, yes, Morse code (Or CW, as hams like to call it), Oh, Oh, I know, I've got one, how come CW? MC not good enough for all those hams? :0) CW is the abreviation for 'continuous wave'. Steve Holland, MI Drake R7, R8 and R8B "I swear by, not at, Drake receivers" © http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But it is really interrupted continuous wave (:-)
-- Keyboard In The Noise Opinions are the cheapest commodities in the world. Author unknown but "right on" ------------------------------ Some one wrote CW is the abreviation for 'continuous wave'. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 22 May 2004 11:06:28 -0500, "Zaphon B."
wrote: I made mention of the fact earlier that I was hearing Morse Code that seemed to be transmitted so fast that it was almost like it was some other form of communication. So questions. Are many people out there able to listen and decode that **** on the fly and understand it or are they going through software programs to decode the stuff. I had to pass the 20 word per minute test to get my extra class license and I hear the same thing. I think some people are actually that proficient and some are using morse readers with keyboard sending. Some of it is so fast I have trouple identifying a single character. HTH 73 Gary K8IQ AND (I know this will sound stupid) but is there actually someone sitting out there hammering this stuff out by hand, like in the old westerns or is it machine made? AND if machine made why? Why are people still sending info with Morse Code? Haven't we sort of moved beyond that, if you know what I mean?? Zaphod "wishing all a good day" |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes there are many folks out here that can copy high speed Morse code.
There are many CW ops that can copy 20+ wpm Morse code -- some in their head without writing or typing it. Some use decoders - they work sort of OK - IF the code received has the correct spacing and the signal is fairly strong. I know of very few Amateur Extras that use a decoder -- as many Amateur Extras can copy 20 WPM or higher -- it was a requirement for the license until a few years ago -- now it is 5 WPM. But some learn it to get the license and never use it and are not proficient in Morse. Keep in mind -- many ops copied code for many hours for many months or years -- such as military and shipboard radio ops or amateur radio ops and it is like a second language to them -- they can hear the sound of whole words and Q signals and thus have a vocabulary in Morse. A Navy chief I worked with could copy 20+ WPM code in his head and carry on a conversation with me at the same time. An analogy is perhaps typing skills -- at first it is slow but good typists can type 100 WPM and not blink an eye -- an acquired skill that takes practice and time to develop proficiency. Comes easy to some -- for others it is a case of dogged determination (like me) -- both Morse and typing (:-) Today many CW ops use an electronic keyer to achieve high speed. Some use a keyboard. A few purists still use a straight key or bug. Morse code is just another form of communication -- it can be copied at times where voice is too weak. Even if Hams speak different languages -- they can communicate essentials with Morse using Q-signals and recognized abbreviations. It is a lot of fun to have and use this skill -- perhaps like using a manual shift in your car as opposed to automatic shift. And then some gun nuts like black powder rifle shooting and some hunters use a bow and arrow -- go figure (:-) -- Keyboard In The Noise -- an old Extra class Ham Opinions are the cheapest commodities in the world. Author unknown but "right on" --------------------------------------------- "Gary" wrote in message ... On Sat, 22 May 2004 11:06:28 -0500, "Zaphon B." wrote: I made mention of the fact earlier that I was hearing Morse Code that seemed to be transmitted so fast that it was almost like it was some other form of communication. So questions. Are many people out there able to listen and decode that **** on the fly and understand it or are they going through software programs to decode the stuff. AND (I know this will sound stupid) but is there actually someone sitting out there hammering this stuff out by hand, like in the old westerns or is it machine made? AND if machine made why? Why are people still sending info with Morse Code? Haven't we sort of moved beyond that, if you know what I mean?? Zaphod "wishing all a good day" |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Zaphon B. wrote: I made mention of the fact earlier that I was hearing Morse Code that seemed to be transmitted so fast that it was almost like it was some other form of communication. So questions. Are many people out there able to listen and decode that **** on the fly and understand it or are they going through software programs to decode the stuff. There's legacy stuff, like the station IDs and traffic lists from maritime shore stations, the IDs for maritime and aeronautical navigation beacons, and probably tactical military stuff just used for practice. But it's basically obsolete. And hams, of course. But if you can afford a computer to receive it, you can use some other modulation method that's far superior. Most maritime stuff, that hasn't gone to satellite, is TOR (Telex over Radio). If the home office wants to contact a ship at sea that's equipped with an Inmarsat satellite terminal, they just call them on the telephone, send a fax, or an email. AND (I know this will sound stupid) but is there actually someone sitting out there hammering this stuff out by hand, like in the old westerns or is it machine made? They don't use hand keys, there are automatic keyboards, or semi-automatic keyers (buzzword: bugs) that speed things up by timing out the dots and dashes. Or computers. if machine made why? Why are people still sending info with Morse Code? Haven't we sort of moved beyond that, if you know what I mean?? Yup, that's why only hams really still use it. Even 40-50 years ago, most businesses shifted over to using the Telex or TWX services, where an operator in their communication center would send a message on a teleprinter through the world wide telegraph networks or direct dial through the phone system. Even RTTY seems to have gone away. (Radio TeleTYpe). Long before computers ran communications, there were printing telegraph systems. Most commonly (for English) they used a 5 bit code, which sent upper case letter, or the numbers and special characters. (They used codes for shift and unshift, Caps Lock in modern terminology). Sent at, by modern standards, at pathetically slow speeds of 42.something, 50, or 75 bits per second using Frequency Shift Keying. Back 15 or 20 years ago, you could pick up a tweedling signal that jumped between two tones. (received in SSB mode on your receiver). If you had the equipment, a Terminal Unit, (the demodulator half of a modem) and a teleprinter that worked with the code, or later a micro-controller decoder box, or computer with software, you could read, literally, the signals. These included weather reports, (in a cryptic coding system), traffic for telegraph systems (Western Union) between countries that didn't have wire connections (US to Cuba), and news services. The same text that was being printed out in newsrooms at news papers and radio stations around the country was also being sent by shortwave to the more remote subscribers. In the clear. (But, aside from the weather data, none of this stuff was public information. They could go after you for violating regulations or copyright for giving it to a third party). Last time I bothered, all that was out there was the North Korean news service. And the maritime TOR system that links ships to whatever is left of the Telex system. And a lot of encrypted stuff (probably military comms to small bases too small for more reliable and high bandwidth links). Mark Zenier Washington State resident |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can always pick out the guys using a hardware or software decoder when
you're working them ... they send CQ at a faster rate than they can copy in their head because the machine does it for them, but then there will be a static crash, or some fading and they will miss a question you've just asked, like "what's your name?", not knowing what you sent (because they can't copy it in their head), they'll send a preprogrammed brag file ... "radio here is a ..... ". So you ask again ... "W H A T I S Y O U R N A M E ? ", this time a little slower. The reply is another brag file, "I work as a .... ". That's okay, I just keep slowing down until they get it ... OH ! "Name is Bob". All part of the fun of CW. di DARRRRR dit ! jw K9RZZ |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
But it is really interrupted continuous wave (:-)
Correct. ICW. I've never heard the designation MICW used before, though, like ships used to use on 500 kHz. In fact, that should be called AMICW. Hi Hi And Morse code is what is used over wires. Wireless uses the International Code. 73, Bill, K5BY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |