Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"starman" wrote:
There's no doubt that ham's are in the minority regarding BPL interference but the FCC has a legal mandate to protect licensed radio spectrum users, as the law now stands. I suppose they'll change the law to get around this legal inconvenience for the BPL industry. It's a balance, Starman. They also have a mandate to serve the public - the whole public, not just some small part of it. And they are protecting the us, the "licensed radio spectrum users," by providing us an opportunity to voice our concerns and requiring the BPL industry to address those concerns before approval is granted. That doesn't mean BPL is killed off entirely simply because we hear noise on our frequencies. Instead, it means that industry must take steps to minimize that. But, again, even that is a balance between the overall benefits of BPL and our ability to use our frequencies. Lets face it, balanced against the large numbers which may benefit from BPL, we may have to accept some inconvenient noise on our frequencies. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||
Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||
Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | CB |