Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 28th 05, 01:07 AM
DougSlug
 
Posts: n/a
Default

It's simple, really. The only reason the Morse testing was required was
because of the international agreement that code is needed for HF access.
Now that the world agrees that code is no longer required for HF access
(from the WRC-03), there is no reason to keep it as a licensing requirement.
All of the emotional arguments about "tradition" and "keeping the riff-raff
out of the hobby" are irrelevant. Anyone who wants to use code will still
learn it, and the mode will still continue to be used by amateurs (who are
really the only people still using it). Every country should drop the
testing requirement, including Canada and the US because it simply is no
longer needed, and the whole world agrees, except for a bunch of stubborn
old hams (and no one even cares what they think any more).


  #2   Report Post  
Old January 28th 05, 02:27 AM
Dave VanHorn
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Despite all the "emergency" arguments, even the coast guard dropped it.

If there ever was a situation where CW might actually be needed, that was
it.
Now, it's just for contests, and hobbies.


  #3   Report Post  
Old January 30th 05, 12:30 PM
N2EY
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article , "Dave VanHorn"
writes:

Despite all the "emergency" arguments, even the coast guard dropped it.


It's a bit more complex than that.

Newer radio systems replaced the need for *radio operators* on ships in the
1990s, and the rules were changed to eliminate the need for maritime CW
capability. Eliminating those jobs saves money, so the shipping companies were
all for the changes.

The Coast Guard eliminated their use of it when the rules changed for the same
reason.

If there ever was a situation where CW might actually be needed, that was
it.


In the recent tsunami disaster, a significant part of the initial radio
communications by amateurs in the disaster area was reportedly done with Morse
Code.

73 de Jim, N2EY




  #4   Report Post  
Old February 16th 05, 12:45 AM
ZZZPK
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"DougSlug" wrote:

: All of the emotional arguments about "tradition" and "keeping the riff-raff
: out of the hobby" are irrelevant. Anyone who wants to use code will still

and when it goes, you will turn amateur radio into multi-band cb radio.

standards will fall.
respect for the license will fall.
problems of deliberate qrm will rise.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] RHF Shortwave 0 January 5th 04 02:49 PM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
Canada says... "Drop the Code!" Hamguy Swap 1 November 1st 03 10:05 PM
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC Brian Policy 3 October 24th 03 12:02 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017