wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
news
Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
news Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.
"****tard Moron" Tom that is part of the problem you can't address
people without throwing out sex laced insults

these tactics made only a matter of time before someone like the meow
folks (althought it is looking like there are about 2 of them under all
those nicks) to the NG but they will get bored soon enough

"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
news Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.
"****tard Moron" Tom that is part of the problem you can't address
people without throwing out sex laced insults

these tactics made only a matter of time before someone like the meow
folks (althought it is looking like there are about 2 of them under all
those nicks) to the NG but they will get bored soon enough


Oh no, you now have an entire group of kooks who love you now. You're
****ed, as are the groups you have now ****ed up. (sex laced verbiage
intended)

U-Know-Who wrote:
"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...


Oh no, you now have an entire group of kooks who love you now.
nope
You're
****ed,
if you want to use such langaige you have nothing to complain about
as are the groups you have now ****ed up. (sex laced verbiage
intended)
Nop the gruops YOU and your freind have spent YEARS ****ing up with
your sex laced verbiage

you kep using sexaulyas a weapon and you WILL keep this gruop from
having anything much to do with radio

it is your choice Tom

"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
news Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.
"****tard Moron" Tom that is part of the problem you can't address
people without throwing out sex laced insults

Ok Mark, you moron. There. I addressed you sans sex. Is that better? Of
course, the "moron" part I refuse to retract as it is a proven fact, not an
insult.

wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:49:55 GMT, "U-Know-Who"
wrote:


Ok Mark, you moron. There. I addressed you sans sex. Is that better?
better now if you and rest can't keep your keybaords out of the gutter
Of
course, the "moron" part I refuse to retract as it is a proven fact, not
an
insult.
Tom it can't be proven faact since it is determined by IQ tests and
you have no way to admister one to me

nor would I sit still for it

but as long as you insist oneenaging in baseless personal attacks you
have to expect it in reutn

you have trouble with this basic notion that what comes around goes
arround

you are not alone of of course the choas around us is the price deal
with it

Dude! Stop doing the crappie flop on your keyboard and TRY to type in
English. Is that too much to ask?

"an old freind" wrote in message
oups.com...

U-Know-Who wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
news Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.
"****tard Moron" Tom that is part of the problem you can't address
people without throwing out sex laced insults

What exactly did he post that was of a sexual nature????

these tactics made only a matter of time before someone like the meow
folks (althought it is looking like there are about 2 of them under all
those nicks) to the NG but they will get bored soon enough


No, we are many, and we have all the time in the world to give you the
negative attention you so desire.

--
Suffer, unto me.
Indulge, my every need.
UV Count 1

"U-Know-Who" wrote:
wrote in message
...
On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 14:38:41 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"jim" wrote in message
news Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting
this once
fine bastion of cb talk. Any comments?

Yup, it sucks.

concour bt it is the end result of years of effort by those that
isnist that another personas sexuality is weapon to use when you can't
beat their arguments

that and the tolerations of these tactics made the result only a a
matter of time

No, the result is brought to Usenet by you being a silly little ****tard,
moron.


Silly little ****tard's are on line one trying to distance themselves from
him..

Landshark wrote:

"jim" wrote in message
news
Got pretty quiet here. The xposting ****s have succeded in polluting this once
fine bastion of cb talk. Any comments?


Yup, it sucks.


nice and to the point shark. hope the fishing is better than the crap on
this forum.