Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
You don't need a antenna test range to determine relative gains. I can only confirm the antennas I have tested. The R-S 102"ss and the Workman X-Terminator are two of them. Maybe so but what would convince an operator who has never used either to pick your choice of an ant over the other? Just because you said so? No. I said you don't have to believe me. The best I can do is to hope that someone's interest has been sparked enough so that they would do the side by side test them self. No one has bothered, so no one can do any better than hypothesize. Nothing you have posted has proven the relative worth of an X-terminator being a better ant than any 102" whip. General consesus on this board claims the 102" whip is superior to anything else. Not saying you are an agent for the X-terminator but where are the hard facts? True, the general consensus is that I am wrong. Years ago the general consensus was that the world was flat. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave |