| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
January 30th 06, 10:32 AM
posted to rec.radio.cb
|
|||
|
|||
"What's the matter? Can't you afford to take a gamble?"
snip BTW, the offer still stands. On second thought, no it doesn't. After seeing how low the price has dropped for this super-duper stick that allegedly performs better than a 102" whip, I'm convinced that your tests were bogus and that you falsified the data/results for whatever reason. I don't know that reason but I'll bet it has something to do with money. Maybe you own stock in the company, or you're the dope in the shop that builds these things -- don't know, don't care, and it don't matter cause you and your antenna are worthless. Now go get a -real- job and quit selling snake oil on the internet. That's ok Frank. You have the right to think what you want. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
| Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
| Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
| Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
| Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave | |||
Threaded Mode
