| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
January 30th 06, 09:38 AM
posted to rec.radio.cb
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
What doesn't make sense is you -refusing- $200 and a free antenna. If your test results are valid then that's what you get. But since I don't believe you ran a valid test, and you keep pushing people to buy the antenna and test it for themselves, it only seems right that you should have some sort of stake in this test. Since the antenna costs you only pennies then just how much of a risk is it to you, tnom? Seeing how my original intention was to show that the X-Terminator was an under performer * I find it hard to believe that I fudged the numbers so that the outcome would dispute my own statements of it being an under performer. * (You can research my posts on this manner that occurred before I ever ran the test, don't ask me to do it for you) I know exactly what you wrote as your intended purpose of the test. You've said it many, many times, and unlike you, I can read and understand something the -first- time. What you -still- can't understand is that I believe your claim (as to your original intent) to be a lie. Regardless, my intent is to do the same; if my results are the same as yours, wouldn't that be a huge endorsement not just for the antenna, but also for your credibility? If your results were valid then what do you have to lose? Believe what you want to believe. I don't need your endorsement. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
| Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
| Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
| Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
| Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave | |||
Hybrid Mode
