wrote in message
news
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:18:00 -0000, "Dean M" wrote:


wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:45:02 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote:

wrote:

nope more like woger and yourself not anybody



funny that you like to might fun of the diabled even when it has
nothing to do with the thread

but then you are a censor wannabe

As opposed to you.. a censorship practitioner!!???

I do not practice censorship at all
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/


BRAVO SIERRA MARK You stated yourself, until you edited it away that you
only allow those posts that you agree with By definition that's censorship

Is this what they taught you in military officer training school??

You are definitely the quintessential mental deficient

sewer file for you

reply all you want

I pity the Copper Country club you belong to

phhewww



--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Dean M wrote:
BRAVO SIERRA MARK You stated yourself, until you edited it away that you
only allow those posts that you agree with By definition that's censorship

Sorry, that's not the definition of "censorship".
Discrimination is not necessarily censorship.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
et...
Dean M wrote:
BRAVO SIERRA MARK You stated yourself, until you edited it away that you
only allow those posts that you agree with By definition that's
censorship

Sorry, that's not the definition of "censorship".
Discrimination is not necessarily censorship.

I would certainly agree with you BUT what his niblets was doing was not
being discriminating, far from he. He invited comments then refused to post
any of those that he did not approve of. As in point, he revised that thing
he calls a blog, to eliminate anything he wrote

trying to post a a dozen or so insulting coments to this blog just doesn't

work since i moderate them



IOW if it's not to his liking it's outta here



OOOppss now I'll be sued for copyright infringement Thanks Cecil, just what
I need ;-)



--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

Dean M wrote:
I would certainly agree with you BUT what his niblets was doing was not
being discriminating, far from he. He invited comments then refused to post
any of those that he did not approve of.

That doesn't meet the definition of "censorship".
It is very difficult for a private citizen who is
not employed or appointed by the government to
engage in "censorship".

Editors of newspapers invite letters to the editors
and then refuse to publish them. That's not
"censorship".

QEX invites articles to be submitted and then refuses
to publish them after agreeing to publish them. That's
not censorship.
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com

"Cecil Moore" wrote:

Sorry, that's not the definition of "censorship".
Discrimination is not necessarily censorship.


Mark's has defined 'censorship' as having one (or more) of his postings
rejected by a moderated newsgroup.

Using that same definition, he practices 'censorship' in his own blog site's
'readers comments' area.

On Feb 8, 1:52 pm, "Dean M" wrote:
wrote in message

news




On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 12:18:00 -0000, "Dean M" wrote:

wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007 20:45:02 -0500, "KH6HZ" wrote:

wrote:

nope more like woger and yourself not anybody

funny that you like to might fun of the diabled even when it has
nothing to do with the thread

but then you are a censor wannabe

As opposed to you.. a censorship practitioner!!???

I do not practice censorship at all
http://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

BRAVO SIERRA MARK You stated yourself, until you edited it away that you
only allow those posts that you agree with By definition that's censorship

Is this what they taught you in military officer training school??

You are definitely the quintessential mental deficient

sewer file for you

reply all you want

I pity the Copper Country club you belong to

phhewww

What Copper Country Club? That's never been brought up here. Looks
like more Robesin stalking to me.