On Feb 2, 6:24�am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 2, 5:56 am, Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:12 pm, wrote:
On 1 Feb 2007 03:54:52 -0800, wrote:
On Feb 1, 2:18 am, "an old friend" wrote:
On Feb 1, 1:03 am, Dave Heil wrote:
Careful about getting caught up in your own catch-22s.
Did the DXer lower himself to working a contest? *I recall one
notorious DXer saying that working DX in a Contest isn't DXing.
I hope you aren't going to try to attribute such a statement to me.
I never wrote any such thing. *There's plenty of DX to be worked in a
contest. *I've been contesting since before I ever chased DX.
paranoia prehaps?
Paranoid? *Paranoid that his words will come back to haunt him.
nah not that after all you and I are unable to truly understand His
word
The record will show him making such a claim.
and he deny it as always
Now, now. *You might be found guilty of profiling.
Have you or the fellow with numerous issues found a quote yet?
Have you or other issue laden persons seen me looking?

I've never seen you, looking or not. *You made a claim, added a couple
of additional snide comments. *You've not backed it up as it isn't
factual. *

Dave,

It's a safe bet that there will be no evidence presented to back up
that "contesting isn't DXing" claim by "hot-ham-and-cheese".

That's because he just doesn't *do* that. He makes inaccurate claims
that somebody wrote something, but when challenged, does not provide
any quotes or other objective evidence.

For example, he has claimed that I misstated the distance from the
earth to the moon here. That's not true, but he won't admit it.

I would think that you'd want to produce evidence that your
statement has merit.

You are mistaken, Dave. It's not about producing evidence or proving
the merit of his statements.

It's about "hot-ham-and-cheese" getting attention.

73 de Jim, N2EY

btw: Short Ribs, slow cooked. One pot mild, one pot spicy.