| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
February 18th 07, 06:28 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote:
Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. 73 kh6hz |
|
#2
February 18th 07, 11:14 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let the Lying Begin, was: Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 1:28 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. 73 kh6hz QRZ.COM disagrees. Is the following callsign sequentially issued? WE1RD Lookups: 434 MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION 39 SUTTON ST APT 1 PROVIDENCE RI 02903 |
|
#3
February 18th 07, 11:42 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let the Lying Begin, was: Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote:
KH6HZ For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever KH6HZ trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. QRZ.COM disagrees. Is the following callsign sequentially issued? WE1RD Lookups: 434 I am not the trustee of that callsign. My quoted statement above is 100% accurate to this day. None of the club callsigns ever issued to me by the FCC have been vanity callsigns. Try to fabricate a more believable post next time. |
|
#4
February 19th 07, 03:44 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let the Lying Begin, was: Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: KH6HZ For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever KH6HZ trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. QRZ.COM disagrees. Is the following callsign sequentially issued? WE1RD Lookups: 434 I am not the trustee of that callsign. WE1RD Lookups: 434 MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION 39 SUTTON ST APT 1 PROVIDENCE RI 02903 Nice snip and dodge, Deignan. You're not the trustee of the "Michael P. Deignan Repeater Association?" That's too bad, because you being given credit for it. My quoted statement above is 100% accurate to this day. None of the club callsigns ever issued to me by the FCC have been vanity callsigns. Try to fabricate a more believable post next time. No fabrications. |
|
#5
February 19th 07, 01:38 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 1:28?pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. Ooops - looks like I was mistaken about the vanity aspect. If they were not vanity callsigns, then they were all sequentially issued, right? I will reword my questions, then: Who was harmed by the assignment of those sequentially-issued club callsigns? If someone was harmed by the assignment of those sequentially-issued club callsigns, how were they harmed? Have any of those callsigns been reissued, either sequentially or through the vanity system? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
|
#6
February 19th 07, 02:12 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote:
Ooops - looks like I was mistaken about the vanity aspect. No problem. Sometimes it is difficult to keep the "facts" separated from all the "fabrication" Brian likes to dream up. If they were not vanity callsigns, then they were all sequentially issued, right? That is correct. Have any of those callsigns been reissued, either sequentially or through the vanity system? Not that I'm aware of. But then, I haven't checked either. |
|
#7
February 19th 07, 02:42 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 8:38 pm, wrote:
On Feb 18, 1:28?pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: wrote: Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. Ooops - looks like I was mistaken about the vanity aspect. If they were not vanity callsigns, then they were all sequentially issued, right? Yes, nine (9) sequentially issued for Hawaii. Here's a query that I ran in 1998 or 1999. Note the PO Box #... no wonder Jeff was working hard to disassociate himself from the guy that hijacked his PO Box. ---------- Callsign lookup results for: CALL "" NAME "DEIGNAN" CITY "" STATE "" ZIP "" LIMIT "0100" Program v1.3 - 8 March 1997 -- Last database update 1998-08-02 11:02 KH6HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P LIC ISU 4- DEC-1997 ADVANCED 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 14- OCT-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 4- DEC-1997 WH6DDR WAIKIKI WIRELESS ASSOCIATION LIC ISU 6- MAR-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 6- MAR-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 6- MAR-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDQ MANANA ISLAND IOTA GROUP LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDP RF COMMANDOS HAWAII CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDN PACIFIC ISLE DX SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDO KAMAAINA KILOWATT CLUB LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DDM GREATER HONOLULU QRP SOCIETY LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1CCE RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER LIC ISU 20- FEB-1997 CLUB 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 20- FEB-2007 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 20- FEB-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCY CLOSED REPEATER COORDINATION SOCIETY LIC ISU 8- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 8- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 8- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE WH6DCX MICHAEL P DEIGNAN AMATEUR RADIO ASSOCIATLIC ISU 7- JAN-1997 CLUB P. O. BOX 8282 LIC EXP 7- JAN-2007 HONOLULU HI 96830-0282 LST UPD 7- JAN-1997 KD1HZ DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P IS RESPONSIBLE KB1AYF DEIGNAN, DIANE P LIC ISU 26- OCT-1993 TECH PLUS 136 NELSON ST LIC EXP 26- OCT-2003 PROVIDENCE RI 02908 LST UPD 24- FEB-1996 Since the above does not, for some strange reason, give a return for KD6HZ in its own right, everyone may be wondering who KD6HZ is. So I searched. The database said the call has been changed to KH6HZ. And who is KH6HZ? Well, none other than: HamCallTM Query Results: KH6HZ Michael P. Deignan 136 Nelson St Providence, RI 02908 License Class: Advanced ------------------ I will reword my questions, then: Why? Deignan has been busted, and your support of him is noted. 1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ (Sequential??? Highly UNLIKLEY) 4) WH6DDR, 5) WH6DDQ, 6) WH6DDP, 7) WH6DDM, 8) WH6DDN, 9) WH6DDO, 10) WH6DCX, 11) WH6DCY, 12) KB1CCE, 13) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION |
|
#8
February 19th 07, 02:49 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
wrote:
1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ (Sequential??? Highly UNLIKLEY) Who is KD6HZ? Never heard of him (or her). Did I alledgedly have this callsign while travelling overseas on my Ocean-Going Trawler based out of Washington State? 13) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION Bzzzzt. Wrong again. Not the trustee of this one either. |
|
#9
February 19th 07, 03:47 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 9:49 pm, "KH6HZ" wrote:
wrote: 1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ (Sequential??? Highly UNLIKLEY) Who is KD6HZ? Never heard of him (or her). Did I alledgedly have this callsign while travelling overseas on my Ocean-Going Trawler based out of Washington State? 13) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION Bzzzzt. Wrong again. Not the trustee of this one either. And the 11 others? Correct? No wonder all this slipped past the FCC, so many to keep track of. |
|
#10
February 19th 07, 05:48 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
Residence vs. Mailing Address
On Feb 18, 9:42�pm, wrote:
On Feb 18, 8:38 pm, wrote: On Feb 18, 1:28?pm, "KH6HZ" wrote: wrote: Who was harmed by the assignment of those vanity callsigns? For the record, none of the club callsigns I have ever trusteed for have been "vanity" callsigns. Ooops - looks like I was mistaken about the vanity aspect. If they were not vanity callsigns, then they were all sequentially issued, right? Yes, nine (9) sequentially issued for Hawaii. Not a dozen, and not vanity. *Here's a query that I ran in 1998 or 1999. *Note the PO Box #... no wonder Jeff was working hard to disassociate himself from the guy that hijacked his PO Box. How do you know the PO Box was "hijacked"? ---------- Callsign lookup results for: CALL "" NAME "DEIGNAN" CITY "" STATE "" ZIP "" LIMIT "0100" Program v1.3 - 8 March 1997 -- Last database update 1998-08-02 11:02 So this is from almost a decade ago. KH6HZ *DEIGNAN, MICHAEL P *LIC ISU *4-DEC-1997 ADVANCED * * Not an Extra - an Advanced! WH6DDR * *WAIKIKI WIRELESS ASSOCIATION * * * WH6DDQ * * * * * * MANANA ISLAND IOTA GROUP * * * WH6DDP * * * * * * RF COMMANDOS HAWAII CHAPTER * WH6DDN * * * * * * PACIFIC ISLE DX SOCIETY * * * * * * WH6DDO * * * * * * KAMAAINA KILOWATT CLUB * * WH6DDM * * * * * * GREATER HONOLULU QRP SOCIETY * * * * * * KB1CCE * * * * * * RF COMMANDOS RHODE ISLAND CHAPTER * * WH6DCY * * * * * * CLOSED REPEATER COORDINATION WH6DCX * * * * * * MICHAEL P DEIGNAN AMATEUR RADIO Since the above does not, for some strange reason, give a return for KD6HZ in its own right, everyone may be wondering who KD6HZ is. *So I searched. *The database said the call has been changed to KH6HZ. *And who is KH6HZ? Well, none other than: HamCallTM Query Results: *KH6HZ Michael P. Deignan License Class: Advanced So the guy changed his call a couple of times. Is that not allowed by the rules? ------------------ I will reword my questions, then: Why? Because they are not vanity calls. *Deignan has been busted, "busted"? How? What was the penalty? and your support of him is noted. What support? I am simply trying to get to the bottom of these alleged violations. So far, it turns out that at least some of the information supplied here was incorrect. It turns out that: - the disputed callsigns were not vanity callsigns, - FCC requires a mailing address, not residence or station location - there is no limit on the number of clubs that can name an individual as trustee - the person in question was not an Extra when all this happened. 1) KD1HZ, 2) KD6HZ, 3) KH6HZ *(Sequential??? *Highly UNLIKLEY) Are any of those callsigns in dispute? 4) WH6DDR, 5) WH6DDQ, 6) WH6DDP, 7) WH6DDM, 8) WH6DDN, 9) *WH6DDO, 10) *WH6DCX, 11) *WH6DCY, 12) KB1CCE, Nine callsigns, not a dozen. Are any of them current? 13) WE1RD MICHAEL P DEIGNAN REPEATER ASSOCIATION That one is current - and the trustee is not Mr. Deignan. So what's the problem? Jim, N2EY |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| 3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Antenna | |||
| 3rd RFD: rec.radio.amateur.moderated moderated (LAST CALL FOR COMMENTS) | Dx | |||
| You don't need any more proof. | General | |||
| Radio call letters: What do they mean? | Shortwave | |||
| The Pool | Policy | |||
Hybrid Mode
