On Mar 4, 11:15�pm, wrote:
On 4 Mar 2007 20:00:09 -0800, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:





On Mar 4, 10:31?pm, wrote:
On 4 Mar 2007 19:24:49 -0800, "Dloyd Lavies"
wrote:

nope I understood who you were responding to but as I said in anypost
today if you want to have a private chat don't post it HERE

C'mon Markie, you lost total track of the thread....

nope

Yes you did.

.... and if I want to have
a private chat in MY thread, I will post it.

then don't bitch when someone else relies

Most normal people can follow a thread and only respond when in
conversation,

I can follow but you post to threads not addressed to you

You can't follow a thread, which is evidenced by you answering every
single post, even when it is directed to another person.

I have te same right

To what? Post a response to a communication when its directed to
someone other than you, that is just like the anology I posted where
you answer for someone else.

you don'tlike it *get the **** out of herehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

What's the problem Mark, why do you have to stoop to being nasty and
using foul language. But it proves several of my points, that because
this is not a physical world, you act accordingly, and no one can have
a rational discussion with you. In the real world, I can guarantee
you would not tell me to my face to "get the f**k out of here, unless
you have a strong desire to start sporting a full set of false teeth.

But by the way you whine and cry and change everypost to someone is
stalking you, maybe you should take your own advice.


Dloyd Lavies, Sweat Lord and Talk Show Buffoon
"In the Domestic Rear"


http://www.markmorgansucks.blogspot.com

On Mar 5, 9:19 am, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 4, 11:15?pm, wrote:



Most normal people can follow a thread and only respond when in
conversation,

I can follow but you post to threads not addressed to you

You can't follow a thread,..............

yes I can
........ which is evidenced by you answering every
single post, even when it is directed to another person.

I can answer any thread I like

so can you

you hijack most thread you post in



I have te same right

To what?

Post a response to a communication when its directed to
someone other than you,...........

exactly

......... that is just like the anology I posted where
you answer for someone else.

no it isn't

this a discussion forum not a grocery store



you don'tlike it ?get the **** out of herehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

What's the problem Mark, why do you have to stoop to being nasty and
using foul language.

the problem is you are a hypocritcal asshole I am simply using langaue
aproate to your mindset

But it proves several of my points, that because
this is not a physical world, you act accordingly, and no one can have
a rational discussion with you.

you can't have a rational discussion with anyone

In the real world, I can guarantee
you would not tell me to my face to "get the f**k out of here, unless
you have a strong desire to start sporting a full set of false teeth.

id tell you in heartbeat and you'd do nothing

if you did you'd be dead or in jail shortly thereafter

But by the way you whine and cry and change everypost to someone is
stalking you, maybe you should take your own advice.
why? I can operate in this evoiment you can't

go to the NG you are so glad not to post in

On Mar 5, 9:40�am, "an_old_friend" wrote:
On Mar 5, 9:19 am, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

On Mar 4, 11:15?pm, wrote:

Most normal people can follow a thread and only respond when in
conversation,

I can follow but you post to threads not addressed to you

You can't follow a thread,..............

yes I can

........ which is evidenced by you answering every
single post, even when it is directed to another person.

I can answer any thread I like

but it's inappropriate

so can you

Yes, but I try to follow NG ediquite, something that you obviously
something you know nothing about

you hijack most thread you post in

I don't post enough to hijack threads. I've posted 20 times during the
month of March and only on my own threads, you on the otherhand you
have already posted 275 times on everybody eles's threads, you have
hijacked so many threads this month its ridiculous and its only the
fifth day of the month, by the end of the month you will have posted
1375 times. Your problem is you don't realize that this is
inappropriate behavoir. Your like some bully crapping on everybody's
posts.



I have te same right

To what?
*Post a response to a communication when its directed to
someone other than you,...........

exactly

No you don't, unless you are a retard and can't follow a thread. Why
would you answer someone when they aren't talking to you?


......... that is just like the anology I posted where
you answer for someone else.

no *it isn't

this a discussion forum not a grocery store

Same difference, it is still two people talking to each other
communicating, there is no difference between here, a grocery store, a
ham band, or any other means. People exchange their thoughts directly
and only to each other all the time, that why we have quotes,
everything is not always about you..

you don'tlike it ?get the **** out of herehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

What's the problem Mark, why do you have to stoop to being nasty and
using foul language. *

the problem is you are a hypocritcal asshole I am simply using langaue
aproate to your mindset

I'm not a hypocrite, I don't hijack threads or post 275 times in five
days, I would never do any of the crap that you do because your
behavoir is so inappropriate.

But it proves several of my points, that because
this is not a physical world, you act accordingly, and no one can have
a rational discussion with you. *

you can't have a rational discussion with anyone

In the real world, I can guarantee
you would not tell me to my face to "get the f**k out of here, unless
you have a strong desire to start sporting a full set of false teeth.

id tell you in heartbeat and you'd do nothing

Don't bet your life on that.

if you did you'd be dead or in jail shortly thereafter

Well if you killed me because I wasr kicking your ass, that means you
would be guilty of murder, so you would end up in jail for life.
Deadly force is not an acceptable means of defense when no weapons are
involved.


But by the way you whine and cry and change everypost to someone is
stalking you, maybe you should take your own advice.

why? I can operate in this evoiment you can't

go to the NG you are so glad not to post in

Mark, I am not going anywhere, so stop whining like a little bitch
just because you can't poison the moderated group.

Dloyd Lavies, Sweat Lord and Talk Show Buffoon
"In the Domestic Rear"


http://www.markmorgansucks.blogspot.com

On Mar 5, 10:47 am, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 9:40?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:


there is no difference between hereeditied, a
ham band,
not according to th FCC

People exchange their thoughts directly
and only to each other all the time, that why we have quotes,
everything is not always about you..

I never said it was about me


you don'tlike it ?get the **** out of herehttp://kb9rqz.blogspot.com/

What's the problem Mark, why do you have to stoop to being nasty and
using foul language. ?

the problem is you are a hypocritcal asshole I am simply using langaue
aproate to your mindset

I'm not a hypocrite,

yes you are you do something then deny you do it

I don't hijack threads or post 275 times in five
days, I would never do any of the crap that you do because your
behavoir is so inappropriate.

how so?

you have a strong desire to start sporting a full set of false
teeth.

id tell you in heartbeat and you'd do nothing

Don't bet your life on that.

you can find anytime you like Id rather you did not esp now it would
be rough getting the blood up off the snow

if you did you'd be dead or in jail shortly thereafter

Well if you killed me because I wasr kicking your ass, that means you
would be guilty of murder, so you would end up in jail for life.

nope. indeed I don't have to wait for the first blow to land,
althought that would be safer legaly

Deadly force is not an acceptable means of defense when no weapons are
involved.

not the case in Michigan



But by the way you whine and cry and change everypost to someone is
stalking you, maybe you should take your own advice.

why? I can operate in this evoiment you can't

go to the NG you are so glad not to post in

Mark, I am not going anywhere, so stop whining like a little bitch
just because you can't poison the moderated group.

I don't want to poison any NG

please stop lying about me

On Mar 5, 10:47 am, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 9:40?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:





On Mar 5, 9:19 am, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:

On Mar 4, 11:15?pm, wrote:

Most normal people can follow a thread and only respond when in
conversation,

I can follow but you post to threads not addressed to you

You can't follow a thread,..............

yes I can

........ which is evidenced by you answering every
single post, even when it is directed to another person.

I can answer any thread I like

but it's inappropriate

nope

it is the whole point of NG's



so can you

Yes, but I try to follow NG ediquite, something that you obviously
something you know nothing about
where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law

you do not enage in on topic post that is a violation of neNG policy

On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:
where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law

Who is defaming you? I started this thread about the moderated group,
you hijacked MY thread, and you took it off topic. Everything that I
have posted is based upon my view and observation of the posts on here
and responses to specific posts. If you don't like it, you can take a
quarter and call someone who cares.

If a law has been broken, call the law. You know what law has been
broken, none.

And who has forged a name. Dloyd Lavies is my pen name, many authors
have pen names, it is legal. Don't try to play lawyer, it is apparent
that you have no legal training whatsoever because you throw acusitory
legal terms around without knowing the implications of such terms.

you do not enage in on topic post that is a violation of neNG policy

You are blabbering something about a violation of NG policy, but your
fumble fingers has made it unreadable, but I will address one policy
violation issue, which is your excessive posting. Your excessive
posting is a violation of Google Groups Policy, because if you posted
directly into the group instead of a news server and using all of your
different names, you access to post would be limited. It is apparent
that you post using one name until you are suspended, then you start
using another, just to flood the group with your posts.

Google Groups Help Center

Is there a limit on how often I can post?

Yes, there are a few ways in which posting frequency is limited. One
limits the number of messages posted to a single group within a short
period of time. If that limit is reached, posting to that group will
be frozen temporarily and you'll be instructed to post again later.

Another limits the number of messages a single user can post via email
in a short period of time. If that limit is reached, your posting
account will be disabled. If your account has been disabled, you can
click the "contact us" link below and request that your account be
reactivated. We'll review your request, and let you know what we
decide.

We may also limit the number of messages a single user or computer can
post via our website in a short period of time. If that limit is
reached, posting will be frozen temporarily and you'll be instructed
to post again later.

Please note, we are unable to provide the exact numbers that trigger
these posting limits as the limits are subject to change.

These limits are to protect the users of our service and their email
accounts, our groups, and the Usenet community from poorly configured
auto-responders, spammers, robots, trolls, and thread hijacking.


Google Groups.

id tell you in heartbeat and you'd do nothing
Don't bet your life on that.

you can find anytime you like Id rather you did not esp now it would
be rough getting the blood up off the snow

What blood, you would be on your knees in about a 10 seconds withont
any blood at all. I saw your photo, no problem. The goal is to apply
a lot of pain without any residual evidence of such force. Many law
enforcement agencies and federal employers, such as my former, provide
excellent training in the application of these techniques. But of
course, this requires me to actually touch you, but you appear to be
way too filthy and dirty that I would ever want to touch your. Do
ever take a bath? I bet LLoyd is cleaner than you.

if you did you'd be dead or in jail shortly thereafter
Well if you killed me because I was kicking your ass, that means you
would be guilty of murder, so you would end up in jail for life.

nope. indeed I don't have to wait for the first blow to land,
althought that would be safer legaly

Sure Markie, that defense would not stand a chance in any district or
judical circuit in the US, even in the 8th circuit.
Like I said, it is apparent that you have no legal training
whatsoever.

not the case in Michigan

Actually, Michigan is one of the more liberal circuits, you better
have significant evidence to warrant justifiable homicide. The courts
would put you away forever if you try to say "oh he was giving me a
hard time on the internet after I **** on everyone's postings, and I
was scared, so I killed him even though he had no weapons. You are
such an idiot.

stop whining like a little bitch just because you can't poison the moderated group.

I don't want to poison any NG please stop lying about me

No lie, you flooding policy and misc. is evidence enough of your handy
work.


Dloyd Lavies, Sweat Lord and Talk Show Buffoon
"In the Domestic Rear"


http://www.markmorgansucks.blogspot.com

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:

where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law

Who is defaming you?
how do I know

I started this thread about the moderated group,
you hijacked MY thread, and you took it off topic.

it was never ontopic

it is not YOUR thread

once you post it it belongs to RRAP

Everything that I
have posted is based upon my view and observation of the posts on here
and responses to specific posts.

and you personal bigootries

If you don't like it, you can take a
quarter and call someone who cares.

I can call anyone I like anyway mighty white of you to grant me that
right
Dloyd Lavies is my pen name, many authors
have pen names, it is legal.

bull****

with you blog and your use of LLoyd image you are a criminal fraud

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:

where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law

Who is defaming you?

You are blabbering something about a violation of NG policy, but your
fumble fingers has made it unreadable, but I will address one policy
violation issue, which is your excessive posting.
you just defamed me again

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:

where is it allow to defame someone as porper or to forge their name
or violate the law

id tell you in heartbeat and you'd do nothing
Don't bet your life on that.

you can find anytime you like Id rather you did not esp now it would
be rough getting the blood up off the snow

What blood, you would be on your knees in about a 10 seconds withont
any blood at all.
well you have now clearly comited the crime of stalking
I saw your photo, no problem. The goal is to apply
a lot of pain without any residual evidence of such force. Many law
enforcement agencies and federal employers, such as my former, provide
excellent training in the application of these techniques. But of
course, this requires me to actually touch you, but you appear to be
way too filthy and dirty that I would ever want to touch your. Do
ever take a bath? I bet LLoyd is cleaner than you.

and you just defamed me again

On Mar 5, 2:07 pm, "Dloyd Lavies" wrote:
On Mar 5, 10:56?am, "an_old_friend" wrote:


if you did you'd be dead or in jail shortly thereafter
Well if you killed me because I was kicking your ass, that means you
would be guilty of murder, so you would end up in jail for life.

nope. indeed I don't have to wait for the first blow to land,
althought that would be safer legaly

Sure Markie, that defense would not stand a chance in any district or
judical circuit in the US, even in the 8th circuit.

noit acording to the testimony of the THIS counties DA and sheriff in
rergard to recent charges in law

Like I said, it is apparent that you have no legal training
whatsoever.

but I trust the sheriif and DA's legal training

not the case in Michigan

Actually, Michigan is one of the more liberal circuits, you better
have significant evidence to warrant justifiable homicide. The courts
would put you away forever if you try to say "oh he was giving me a
hard time on the internet after I **** on everyone's postings, and I
was scared, so I killed him even though he had no weapons.

no Dloyd your post that you would kill if you showed means I can kill
you out of hand

I would say he threatened to kill if he showed up he showed therfore
there was a clear danger I did not know if he was armed or not