In article , Mike Coslo
writes: N2EY wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: I think that the numbers of hams will continue to decrease until we are taken out of the limbo we have been in for some time now. What "limbo", Mike? We've had a class of US ham license with no code test for more than 13-1/2 years now. The maximum code test speed has been 5 wpm for more than 4 years now - and for a decade before that, medical waivers were available. Limbo is when a prospective ham thinks that possibly he or she can get on HF simply by waiting a few months and not having to take any Morse code test. OK. But would that really keep a lot of folks from getting any license at all? It would seem to me that the sensible thing to do in that situation, were someone that averse to the 5 wpm code test, would be to pass the Tech and General writtens. Maybe toss in the Extra written too. They'd have a Tech license and General and/or Extra CSCE. Then, when the code test went away, they'd be all set to go. Spend the waiting time setting up a station, antenna, etc. Let's compare the situation to when the Governor of PA had the temporary tax exemption on computers. I think it lasted something like a week. Guess what happened to computer sales at the local Circuit City, Best Buy, etc. the week or two before the exemption. When I went in and looked around, the sales clerk at one store even told me to hold off until next week. Seems like a direct comparison to me. Not really. We *knew* the tax exemption was coming, and it was only a week or two away. And we knew the exemption would only last a week or so. It made sense for folks who were contemplating a computer purchase to simply wait a week or two. Here in southeast PA, some folks simply drive to Delaware for big taxable purchases that are easily portable. Computers, hamgear, cameras, etc. The big question is whether the savings offset the driving cost. Yet our businesses survive. The code test may or may not go away in the next few years/months/decades. The written exams may change similarly. The various bands may change as well. I don't think that's the problem. The prospective amateur has *no* idea at this time if the Morse code requirement will be kept, how long it will be kept if it is, and when it will go away if it is discarded. So? Someone who really wants to be a ham will do what is necessary to pass the tests at the time. I'd temper that. If I thought that the Morse requirement would go away in say, 6 months, I would have waited. Sure - but that's if you knew for sure. At this point we don't even have an NPRM. ARRL predicted 2 years. It's been over 14 months since WRC 2003 ended. And most people do not expect a long time to pass before it goes away. I know some people were incredulous when I gave my time to expiry (if any) in that pool we had a while back. I reposted the list/pool. Look how many people were wrong - including me. In as much as most people will not imagine that the changes to come will take as long as as the will likely take, the net effect will be potential Hams sitting and waiting for the Morse code to go away. Maybe some will. I think most interested folks will simply learn enough to pass the tests and get on with it. Its certainly what I would do if I were thinking about getting a license at this point. But it's not what you did when you got started. Some things operating there. There was no code elimination horizon. Sure there was. NCI was pushing for it, weren't they? WRC 2003 was on the way. I'm skeptical enough and have enough experience that I knew it was going to be a long time coming I wanted to get on HF pretty badly. I'm not afraid of learning something (even though it was admittedly very hard for me) You are not alone. Or even rare, despite what some naysayers would have us believe. And would you not get *any* license until the code test went away, or would you just hold off from upgrading? Hard to say. When I originally got my license, I was only planning on being a Technician, and I was thinking about how to apply Amateur radio to my other hobby, Amateur astronomy. I really didn't have much interest in HF at all! then after a field day where I was allowed to operate, I was hooked. So my experience is likely not typical. I disagree! A lot of new hams come into amateur radio by such indirect routes. In my youth, many hams came from the ranks of SWLs. In fact, if it wasn't for the Technician no-code license, I probably wouldn't be a Ham now. (to my great loss!!) See? You would have just held off upgrading. But we don't see that happening. The total number of Tech and Tech Pluses is declining. Whatever is done should be done and done quickly. That said, there is a mile of difference between "should" and "will". I still stand by my original prediction made some time ago. Back in 1989-1990 we were told that a nocodetest ham license was "absolutely needed for growth". And when it became a reality, we got some short-term growth for a few years. Then we were told that the code test had to go for the same reason - and it was dropped to 5 wpm for all classes in 2000. We got some short-term growth for a few years - now we're back *below* the level before the restructuring. It isn't the code or lack of it. It is the limbo state of not knowing what is going to happen. I don't think changes will make for growth, except in the short term. I think it's lack of publicity, plus competition from other activities, plus the loss of "honeydew hams" to cell phones and FRS/GMRS. Plus antenna limitations, RFI, ... I was a ham way back in 1967, when they said incentive licensing would "kill amateur radio". There were about 250,000 US hams back then. Yet in the 10 years after incentive licensing took full effect (1969-1979 or thereabouts) the number of US hams grew by about 100,000, despite poor economic conditions, much less accessible testing, waiting period for Extra, no code waivers and a code test for all hams. And no internet or computer-based training methods. Of course. Way too much emphasis is put on all the modern conveniences and the numbers of Hams. A lot of folks are looking for a challenge, not a giveaway. I wouldn't care if I had to take the test, writing on the back of a shovel with a piece of limestone, while Heidi Klum was trying to distract me. How's that for working her into the thread! ;^) In my case it was Heidi and Jan Smithers fighting over me.... Jim, do you still have those dates? Posted in a new thread. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... William wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... N2EY wrote: btw, thinking of departed rrap folk, it occurred to me that I probably hold the record for most rrapper's QSO'd. Anybody beat this list?: K8MN W4NTI K0HB AC6XG K3LT K4YZ W3RV W6RCA W0EX WA2SI 73 de Jim, N2EY I think you have the record. I've worked four from the list and you. Dave K8MN You've worked me a couple of times. I worked you as K8MN? Nope, not even on SSB. NIL. Then it must have been another David Heil or a slim with the same name and QSL manager. Sorry to have mentioned it. I do not and have not used a QSL manager for my operations as K8MN. Who is K8MN? I'm talking about David Heil. Ever heard of him? Does he use a QSL Manager? Your cutesy-stupid routine can run only so long, "William". Hello??? Hello, yourself. Any ideas yet on the mystery question: "Who is K8MN"? Yes. He's a jerk. I'm certain that it appears that way to a guy such as yourself. Yet you asked, "Who is K8MN?" Is that anything like your cutesy-stupid "CQ Magazine as a Membership Organization" routine? Maybe you can explain another way that to "rejoin" CQ Magazine. So you're going to run your cutesy-stupid routine into the ground? "Strike Twoooo" Hi, hi! There is what you write and then there is what you think you write. Take your time in digesting the material. Soak it all up. Absorb it. No thanks. Your material is toxic. It really just makes you feel weak until all of your "cutesy-stupid genes" have been altered. Ooooh. How long did it take you? To write it? Not very long. I've never sent a "David Heil" QSL. Given that you have a QSL Manager, I suppose that is possible. Never one, with or without a QSL manager. Have you sent QSL's using your name rather than a callsign? Do your cards not have you name on them? Sure they do, in small letters. Nobody QSOs "Dave Heil", they work "K8MN" or "5H3US". "A W4MPY QSL" is also printed on my QSL cards too. I'm sure that nobody is under the impression that they have worked "W4MPY". Just by coincidence, my QSL cards have both my name and my callsign on them! There's a step in the right direction. I'm happy for you. Plus the other usual stuff like my address, county, grid square, etc. You're coming right along. All my operations have taken place from a given spot with a given callsign. Try mobile operation sometime, Oh Greatest of Hams! I do that about five days per week. "K8MN/M, Marshall County, West Virginia" or "K8MN/mobile, Belmont County, Ohio" or "K8MN/mobile in Wheeling, West Virginia" all work just fine. Then you shouldn't give misleading information such as, "All my operations have taken place from a given spot..." It isn't misleading at all. At any point in any QSO, I'm in a given spot. Sometimes the car is moving. Sometimes it is not. Stick around and all these great mysteries will be revealed. Another ham on rrap would have called you a liar for that. No other did. You've as much as done so though. How about a lengthy yarn about your operation as T5/Brian? How about a ditty on "how to" on snagging rare, out-of-band, French Hams on 6M? I've never operated using my name as a callsign. I couldn't imagine it. Who would do that? From your recent posts, I rather imagined that you might. My operations from any country on any band, when working any Frenchmen have been totally within regulations of the applicable governing authority. Good thing, too. Yeah, I think it is a good thing. I heed the regulations of the country in which I operate. It is up to other ops to do the same. None of those involved is responsible to you. Sheesh! I think you are more indignant about working me on HF than you were about me leaving you off of the A1A Op list. Doesn't matter. You'll always find something to become indignant about. There is no A1A Op list. You screwed up when you first posted the material. You told untruths I made a mistake. You made several. when you recently brought up the topic. You acted as if you didn't believe I could unearth the original post (that must've cost me ten or twenty seconds) and you've gotten the name of the club wrong now. No. I think I my original premise was right. Some amateurs are nice guys and deserve to be on that list. An interesting thing about that: You don't get to decide that. Two ops who are members decide that. Then there are others who are jerks and shouldn't be on that list. You don't get to decide that. Two ops who are members decide that. How you got on it is a mystery to me, I can understand that. I'm sure that a number of things are a mystery to you. but I do stand corrected. You did get on the list somehow. Two ops who are members nominate someone. That is the only way to become an A-1 Op. Perhaps you should read the qualifications for membership. I don't think you'll find anything about suffering fools gladly in usenet. Being indignant has naught to do with it. Keeping you honest has been the problem. Your cutesy-stupid routine and acting indignant is wearing a little thin. Aren't you getting tired of picking up that chip and putting it back on your shoulder? Best of Luck. Your words drip with insincerity. Dave K8MN So sorry. David Heil worked me on two different occassions. Am I to understand that you are not David Heil? If not, I apologize for a case of mistaken identity. |
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 9/17/2004 6:00 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 9/16/2004 5:38 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... Someone needs to make it clear to the overall population that with the reduction of the code requirement to 5wpm across the board (none for Tech) that they were supposed to jump into ham radio in overwhelming numbers and lead to magnificent growth in the number of hams. The "Code Test" has not been an issue for over 35% of the Amateur community for over 13 years now, Brian. Had you been paying attention... Steve, have you ever allowed Jim to speak for himself? If you care to carry on a private conversation with Jim, Brian, may I suggest private e-mail. Otherwise you are posting in a public, unmoderated forum, and your comments are open to all to see, consider and reply to. Sorry if it irritates or otherwise annoys you, but that's the price you pay for "freedom of speech"...Having to also endure others "free speech", whether you like it or not. Steve, K4YZ Yes, you do irritate and annoy me. You are like that; an annoyance and irritant. Like a bug. Jim much less so. He actually has something to say on occassion. But you go beyond irritance and annoyance. You make references to homosexuality and pedophilia, and pseudo-threaten bricks/windows and slashes/tires and terrorist acts on wives. You're a Peach. A Gem. A true Ambassador of Amateur Radio. You would make Riley proud. Ham of the Year material. So when I asked, "Jim, when did we lose the code test?" you felt compelled to answer as if you were Jim? But you answered incorrectly. We still have a code exam. Jim could have told you that since he is incapable of lying (he knows he'll burn in hell for lying, and you know you're already in hell, so what's the diff?). And I keep telling Jim that you cannot help yourself from having to respond to every posting, but he doesn't believe it. Yet you prove it over and over again! And he doesn't believe it. No matter how many times you prove it over and over again, he just doesn't believe it. I think the both of you are dysfunctional. Loggins and Messina got it right, "Twin Brothers of Insane Mothers." Best of Luck. |
N2EY wrote:
In article , Mike Coslo writes: N2EY wrote: In article , Mike Coslo writes: I think that the numbers of hams will continue to decrease until we are taken out of the limbo we have been in for some time now. What "limbo", Mike? We've had a class of US ham license with no code test for more than 13-1/2 years now. The maximum code test speed has been 5 wpm for more than 4 years now - and for a decade before that, medical waivers were available. Limbo is when a prospective ham thinks that possibly he or she can get on HF simply by waiting a few months and not having to take any Morse code test. OK. But would that really keep a lot of folks from getting any license at all? It would seem to me that the sensible thing to do in that situation, were someone that averse to the 5 wpm code test, would be to pass the Tech and General writtens. Maybe toss in the Extra written too. They'd have a Tech license and General and/or Extra CSCE. Then, when the code test went away, they'd be all set to go. Spend the waiting time setting up a station, antenna, etc. It might seem sensible to you or me, but I don't think that all that many people think that way. Of course, they would also have to know about CSCE's too. I didn't know about them until I flunked my first Morse code test. And I'm not certain that the CSCE will apply to the new licensing scheme. And of course, the year and a day might (probably, in my opinion) pass before the new testing regimen takes effect, in which case you will have to take the tests again, and will have wasted the money on the old tests. Let's compare the situation to when the Governor of PA had the temporary tax exemption on computers. I think it lasted something like a week. Guess what happened to computer sales at the local Circuit City, Best Buy, etc. the week or two before the exemption. When I went in and looked around, the sales clerk at one store even told me to hold off until next week. Seems like a direct comparison to me. Not really. We *knew* the tax exemption was coming, and it was only a week or two away. And we knew the exemption would only last a week or so. Specific dates aren't the issue, at least with what I am trying to say. Its the concept of the thing. If you only wait for a while (the Morse code requirement goes away, or the tax is suspended) you will get (the amateur radio license or the computer) for a lot (less effort or less money) My statement is that some people will wait for reduced entry requirements. Most people think change happens quickly. SO they say "I will wait". Then chaneg doesn't occur in a short time. Then they lose interest and go away without ever becoming a Ham. And I don't completely buy that the person who does this wasn't *really* interested. I only recently became a Ham - around 5 years now. I had no real interest in many of the things that Hams do when I got started. I discovered the joys only after some time had passed. Now I'm a member of the BOD at our local club. I was Field day chairman this past year. I control op the club station during the big QSO party of the fall. I'm at every public service event we have. And I am starting to organize a NSS project in PA (wanna join in?) Not too shabby for an "mildly interested" peron, eh? It made sense for folks who were contemplating a computer purchase to simply wait a week or two. As it might make sense to some people to wait before getting their licenses. Here in southeast PA, some folks simply drive to Delaware for big taxable purchases that are easily portable. Computers, hamgear, cameras, etc. The big question is whether the savings offset the driving cost. Yet our businesses survive. No doubt, but aren't we straying a bit here? The code test may or may not go away in the next few years/months/decades. The written exams may change similarly. The various bands may change as well. I don't think that's the problem. The prospective amateur has *no* idea at this time if the Morse code requirement will be kept, how long it will be kept if it is, and when it will go away if it is discarded. So? Someone who really wants to be a ham will do what is necessary to pass the tests at the time. I'd temper that. If I thought that the Morse requirement would go away in say, 6 months, I would have waited. Sure - but that's if you knew for sure. At this point we don't even have an NPRM. ARRL predicted 2 years. It's been over 14 months since WRC 2003 ended. And most people do not expect a long time to pass before it goes away. I know some people were incredulous when I gave my time to expiry (if any) in that pool we had a while back. I reposted the list/pool. Look how many people were wrong - including me. In as much as most people will not imagine that the changes to come will take as long as as the will likely take, the net effect will be potential Hams sitting and waiting for the Morse code to go away. Maybe some will. I think most interested folks will simply learn enough to pass the tests and get on with it. Its certainly what I would do if I were thinking about getting a license at this point. But it's not what you did when you got started. Some things operating there. There was no code elimination horizon. Sure there was. NCI was pushing for it, weren't they? WRC 2003 was on the way. Well, yeah. Remember that you are posting from the point of view of knowing a *lot* of details. When I was a Technician, I had heard of NCI. But I didn't know what a "WRC" was. Takes a while to assimilate all that knowledge. And I did know enough that it was a real requirement, so just the NCI pushing for code elimination didn't hold any sway for me. I'm skeptical enough and have enough experience that I knew it was going to be a long time coming I wanted to get on HF pretty badly. I'm not afraid of learning something (even though it was admittedly very hard for me) You are not alone. Or even rare, despite what some naysayers would have us believe. And would you not get *any* license until the code test went away, or would you just hold off from upgrading? Hard to say. When I originally got my license, I was only planning on being a Technician, and I was thinking about how to apply Amateur radio to my other hobby, Amateur astronomy. I really didn't have much interest in HF at all! then after a field day where I was allowed to operate, I was hooked. So my experience is likely not typical. I disagree! A lot of new hams come into amateur radio by such indirect routes. In my youth, many hams came from the ranks of SWLs. In fact, if it wasn't for the Technician no-code license, I probably wouldn't be a Ham now. (to my great loss!!) See? You would have just held off upgrading. But we don't see that happening. The total number of Tech and Tech Pluses is declining. Whatever is done should be done and done quickly. That said, there is a mile of difference between "should" and "will". I still stand by my original prediction made some time ago. Back in 1989-1990 we were told that a nocodetest ham license was "absolutely needed for growth". And when it became a reality, we got some short-term growth for a few years. Then we were told that the code test had to go for the same reason - and it was dropped to 5 wpm for all classes in 2000. We got some short-term growth for a few years - now we're back *below* the level before the restructuring. It isn't the code or lack of it. It is the limbo state of not knowing what is going to happen. I don't think changes will make for growth, except in the short term. I think it's lack of publicity, plus competition from other activities, plus the loss of "honeydew hams" to cell phones and FRS/GMRS. Plus antenna limitations, RFI, ... I was a ham way back in 1967, when they said incentive licensing would "kill amateur radio". There were about 250,000 US hams back then. Yet in the 10 years after incentive licensing took full effect (1969-1979 or thereabouts) the number of US hams grew by about 100,000, despite poor economic conditions, much less accessible testing, waiting period for Extra, no code waivers and a code test for all hams. And no internet or computer-based training methods. Of course. Way too much emphasis is put on all the modern conveniences and the numbers of Hams. A lot of folks are looking for a challenge, not a giveaway. Oh yeah, that NSS project I'm trying to put together should be a challenge. (wanna join up?) I wouldn't care if I had to take the test, writing on the back of a shovel with a piece of limestone, while Heidi Klum was trying to distract me. How's that for working her into the thread! ;^) In my case it was Heidi and Jan Smithers fighting over me.... hmmm, I might purposely flunk just so I could retest (is there any limit on how many tests you can take?? Jim, do you still have those dates? Posted in a new thread. Okay, thanks. - Mike KB3EIA - |
(William) wrote in message om...
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 9/17/2004 6:00 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Subject: ARS License Numbers From: (William) Date: 9/16/2004 5:38 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... Someone needs to make it clear to the overall population that with the reduction of the code requirement to 5wpm across the board (none for Tech) that they were supposed to jump into ham radio in overwhelming numbers and lead to magnificent growth in the number of hams. The "Code Test" has not been an issue for over 35% of the Amateur community for over 13 years now, Brian. Had you been paying attention... Steve, have you ever allowed Jim to speak for himself? If you care to carry on a private conversation with Jim, Brian, may I suggest private e-mail. Otherwise you are posting in a public, unmoderated forum, and your comments are open to all to see, consider and reply to. Sorry if it irritates or otherwise annoys you, but that's the price you pay for "freedom of speech"...Having to also endure others "free speech", whether you like it or not. Steve, K4YZ Yes, you do irritate and annoy me. You are like that; an annoyance and irritant. Like a bug. Jim much less so. He actually has something to say on occassion. But you go beyond irritance and annoyance. You make references to homosexuality and pedophilia, and pseudo-threaten bricks/windows and slashes/tires and terrorist acts on wives. You're a Peach. A Gem. A true Ambassador of Amateur Radio. You would make Riley proud. Ham of the Year material. So when I asked, "Jim, when did we lose the code test?" you felt compelled to answer as if you were Jim? But you answered incorrectly. We still have a code exam. Jim could have told you that since he is incapable of lying (he knows he'll burn in hell for lying, and you know you're already in hell, so what's the diff?). And I keep telling Jim that you cannot help yourself from having to respond to every posting, but he doesn't believe it. Yet you prove it over and over again! And he doesn't believe it. No matter how many times you prove it over and over again, he just doesn't believe it. I think the both of you are dysfunctional. Loggins and Messina got it right, "Twin Brothers of Insane Mothers." Best of Luck. Date/time/freq pse? QSL? w3rv |
|
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... [snip] And I'm not certain that the CSCE will apply to the new licensing scheme. And of course, the year and a day might (probably, in my opinion) pass before the new testing regimen takes effect, in which case you will have to take the tests again, and will have wasted the money on the old tests. FYI. The CSCE is NOT good for a year. It is good for 365 days so leap years have occasionally caused people problems. For example if you tested on March 30, 1999 then it expired on March 29, 2000 since February of 2000 had 29 days not 28. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: (William) Date: 9/18/2004 4:59 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ... Sorry if it irritates or otherwise annoys you, but that's the price you pay for "freedom of speech"...Having to also endure others "free speech", whether you like it or not. Yes, you do irritate and annoy me. You are like that; an annoyance and irritant. Like a bug. Jim much less so. He actually has something to say on occassion. Well then, you FINALLY are getting the point. You're irritating too. But for different reasons. I irritate you because I refuse to take your mistruths and deceit. But you go beyond irritance and annoyance. You make references to homosexuality and pedophilia, and pseudo-threaten bricks/windows and slashes/tires and terrorist acts on wives. Quoting out of context again for that "slam-dunk" effect... You're a Peach. I prefer apples and strawberries, actually. A Gem. Cubic Zhirconium, perhaps. A true Ambassador of Amateur Radio. When I am participating in Amateur Radio, I am. You would make Riley proud. He's never had to send me "pink slip", Brian, so why wouldn't I...??? Ham of the Year material. As opposed to someone who lies about what a big DX operator he is...?!?! Maybe so, but I doubt it. So when I asked, "Jim, when did we lose the code test?" you felt compelled to answer as if you were Jim? Did I sign my post "N2EY"...? Did I say I was Jim? But you answered incorrectly. We still have a code exam. Jim could have told you that since he is incapable of lying (he knows he'll burn in hell for lying, and you know you're already in hell, so what's the diff?). I am in hell? I don't think so...Thankfully I wake up next to W5AMY...Not YOU. And I keep telling Jim that you cannot help yourself from having to respond to every posting, but he doesn't believe it. Yet you prove it over and over again! And he doesn't believe it. No matter how many times you prove it over and over again, he just doesn't believe it. Why should he? It's not true. It wasn't true yesterday, and it's not true today. I do not respond to "every posting"...Not yours, Not Lennie's, not Jim's nor anyone elses. You have uttered yet ANOTHER mistruth. I think the both of you are dysfunctional. Why? Because we challenge your frequent errors and omissions? Loggins and Messina got it right, "Twin Brothers of Insane Mothers." Best of Luck. No luck needed here, Brian. You're still wrong, and no amount of hand-wringing is going to rid you of your errors. Sucks to be you. Steve, K4YZ |
Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: (William) Date: 9/19/2004 7:57 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Brian Kelly) wrote in message .com... Date/time/freq pse? QSL? w3rv Kelly, I owe you no QSO. bb Hey Brian (W3RV)...nickle says he CAN'T. He might get on there, have a good time, and then realize just how wrong he'd been all along. Then he'd not be able to sleep at night worrying about what Lennie thought of him. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:50 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com