In article ,
(William) writes: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: (William) wrote in message .com... (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: Cecil is off in other newsgroups. I'm sure he got sick and tired of the PCTA regulars in here. :-) Welp, he tried to appease them by joining in one of their CW nets, but they still crapped on him. Then he joined them, but was so distraught by that action he left the group. ******** BULL**** you lying and utterly inconseqential Putzlet!!! ******** You really do need to pop for that tome on "recovering from assholism" and read it as many times as it takes to get it's message. Ah...another "civil discourse" PCTA extra heard from. :-) Civil discourse is RAGING throughout the news group! Heh. All they have is RAGE. :-) Kellie seems to have roared after building up more steam in his mighty catapult! Tsk. He should put a whistle on that steam valve. Nah. We already heard his boiler blow up some while ago. So, three years ago all of four CW-using-fans made a "net" after arranging the contact time and frequency through the newsgroup? Wow. Great "pioneering" of the airwaves...plus awarding "best of" ratings for the four (or was it five?). Yep goading an NCI member into operating during a thunderstorm. They learned nothing from Ben Franklin. Ben who? What was his call? Hi hi. :-) Did the "net" all with CW to show "CW isn't dead!" :-) Well, that just goes to show everyone that ALL newbies on HF MUST learn CW in order to be in company with Giants of the Air! Marvelous "reasoning." Too much seasoning. A broth of frosh oar. :-) Len, go easy on them. It's all they know. I AM being easy on them! :-) Poor babies can't take return fire in here. PCTA extra Double Standard has to be invoked to "justify" (rationalize) their position. Expect more raging nastygrams from them PCTAs. :-) |
"Len Over 21" wrote Moore was licensed before 1952? Okay. Fine. Yup. Hans became a sailor before 1952? Okay. Fine. Nope. Not this Hans. http://tinyurl.com/3dnws With kindest personal regards, de Hans, K0HB |
Dave Heil wrote in message ...
How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and those on the www.hamdata.com site? Feel free to ask "Quitefine" or the folks at www.hamdata.com. Whoever "Quitefine" may be, he/she/they haven't posted any ARS license numbers here. I have, for some time now. The difference between the license totals I post and those at "hamdata" is this: The hamdata numbers are the entire current database, including expired licenses in the grace period, club licenses, RACES licenses, etc. The numbers I post are only the currently active licenses held by individuals. No clubs, no RACES, no expired-but-in-the-grace-period licenses, etc. These facts are all explained in the posts and on the website in question. Both sets of numbers are "right" as long as you keep in mind what they include. Just clarifying the facts. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
N2EY wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and those on the www.hamdata.com site? Feel free to ask "Quitefine" or the folks at www.hamdata.com. Whoever "Quitefine" may be, he/she/they haven't posted any ARS license numbers here. I have, for some time now. The difference between the license totals I post and those at "hamdata" is this: The hamdata numbers are the entire current database, including expired licenses in the grace period, club licenses, RACES licenses, etc. The numbers I post are only the currently active licenses held by individuals. No clubs, no RACES, no expired-but-in-the-grace-period licenses, etc. These facts are all explained in the posts and on the website in question. Both sets of numbers are "right" as long as you keep in mind what they include. Just clarifying the facts. I could have sworn that you'd explained all of that for Leonard's benefit at least on a couple of previous occasions. How could he have confused your postings of the license figures with "Quitefine"? Dave K8MN |
In article , Dave Heil
writes: N2EY wrote: Dave Heil wrote in message ... How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and those on the www.hamdata.com site? Feel free to ask "Quitefine" or the folks at www.hamdata.com. Whoever "Quitefine" may be, he/she/they haven't posted any ARS license numbers here. I have, for some time now. The difference between the license totals I post and those at "hamdata" is this: The hamdata numbers are the entire current database, including expired licenses in the grace period, club licenses, RACES licenses, etc. The numbers I post are only the currently active licenses held by individuals. No clubs, no RACES, no expired-but-in-the-grace-period licenses, etc. These facts are all explained in the posts and on the website in question. Both sets of numbers are "right" as long as you keep in mind what they include. Just clarifying the facts. I could have sworn that you'd explained all of that for Leonard's benefit at least on a couple of previous occasions. More than a couple. Mr. Anderson sometimes has trouble with the interpretation of facts. For example, he still has trouble with the fact that FCC has been renewing Tech Pluses as Techs for 4-1/2 years.... He also seems to have a lot of trouble with recalling certain past events, like when Cecil, W6RCA/W5DXP, participated in rrap and on the air. For the record, in chronological order: 1) Cecil held W6RCA and worked for Intel 2) He retired from Intel and moved back to Texas, in part to care for aging relatives 3) He participated in the 7037 get-together 4) He and I ran antenna tests on 40 CW, checking his vertical against his all-band linear-tuner dipole 4) He got his old W5DXP call back Somewhere in that sequence, he decided that rather than dropping the code test completely, he was satisfied with 5 wpm. He resigned his NCI membership and decreased his rrap participation to near-zero. Mr. Anderson has it all mixed up, as usual. Not my problem, though. How could he have confused your postings of the license figures with "Quitefine"? I don't know. Ask *him*. --- btw, thinking of departed rrap folk, it occurred to me that I probably hold the record for most rrapper's QSO'd. Anybody beat this list?: K8MN W4NTI K0HB AC6XG K3LT K4YZ W3RV W6RCA W0EX WA2SI 73 de Jim, N2EY 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Subject: ARS License Numbers
From: Dave Heil Date: 9/11/2004 10:26 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: N2EY wrote: Just clarifying the facts. I could have sworn that you'd explained all of that for Leonard's benefit at least on a couple of previous occasions. How could he have confused your postings of the license figures with "Quitefine"? Being an idiot helps. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
In article , Gareeb
writes: Come to think of it, it occurs to me that there may be a relationship between aol'ers and those who can't learn code. Hmmmm.... Hmmmm....I use AOL, and I learned and use Morse Code. |
|
N2EY wrote:
btw, thinking of departed rrap folk, it occurred to me that I probably hold the record for most rrapper's QSO'd. Anybody beat this list?: K8MN W4NTI K0HB AC6XG K3LT K4YZ W3RV W6RCA W0EX WA2SI 73 de Jim, N2EY I think you have the record. I've worked four from the list and you. Dave K8MN |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com