In article , Gareeb
writes: On 9 Sep 2004 19:04:03 -0700, (William) wrote: Cecil is off in other newsgroups. I'm sure he got sick and tired of the PCTA regulars in here. :-) Welp, he tried to appease them by joining in one of their CW nets, but they still crapped on him. Then he joined them, but was so distraught by that action he left the group. A fitting closure for this egocentric, confused, whining, alleged (self-proclaimed) "genius" who was, by and large, the hemmeroid of rrap, that is to say, a major pain in the ass sponsored by Intel corp. "Gareeb" (another anonymouse) who wasn't here, wasn't there, wasn't much of anywhere...seems to want to vent. Poor baby. "Gareeb" can't stand Cecil, wants to take swipes at Intel Corporation. Why? Intel isn't any subject for AMATEUR policy discussion. Cecil retired from Intel, his last corporate employer in a long career of electronics industry work. Cecil has a number of patents granted (more than the Katapult King) and is an independent thinker. Not a whiny parody of those who wish to have CW as king and continue to make U.S. amateur radio into the Archaic Radiotelegraphy Service. Perhaps Paul Schleck ought to take a poll and establish the Archaic Radiotelegraphy Service "policy" newsgroup...where all the anonymousies can go and Vent all their bilge and bile to their heart's content? NO independent thinking to be allowed in this new Anonymousie Policy newsgroup! All must slavishly follow The Old Man, worship at the Church of St. Hiram, extoll the "virtues" of CW until the last code key is pried out of cold, dead fingers. Okay, Paul, where be you? :-) |
(Len Over 21) wrote in message ...
In article , (Brian Kelly) writes: (William) wrote in message .com... (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... In article , (William) writes: Cecil is off in other newsgroups. I'm sure he got sick and tired of the PCTA regulars in here. :-) Welp, he tried to appease them by joining in one of their CW nets, but they still crapped on him. Then he joined them, but was so distraught by that action he left the group. ******** BULL**** you lying and utterly inconseqential Putzlet!!! ******** You really do need to pop for that tome on "recovering from assholism" and read it as many times as it takes to get it's message. Ah...another "civil discourse" PCTA extra heard from. :-) Civil discourse is RAGING throughout the news group! Kellie seems to have roared after building up more steam in his mighty catapult! Tsk. He should put a whistle on that steam valve. So, three years ago all of four CW-using-fans made a "net" after arranging the contact time and frequency through the newsgroup? Wow. Great "pioneering" of the airwaves...plus awarding "best of" ratings for the four (or was it five?). Yep goading an NCI member into operating during a thunderstorm. They learned nothing from Ben Franklin. Did the "net" all with CW to show "CW isn't dead!" :-) Well, that just goes to show everyone that ALL newbies on HF MUST learn CW in order to be in company with Giants of the Air! Marvelous "reasoning." Too much seasoning. A broth of frosh oar. :-) Len, go easy on them. It's all they know. bb |
(Steve Robeson K4CAP) wrote in message ...
Subject: Pull a "Cecil?" From: (William) Date: 9/8/2004 6:27 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (Len Over 21) wrote in message ... Independent thought is allowed in here, even cherished, as long as the independency doesn't deviate from established norms of olde-tyme hamme raddio. Their theme music might just as well be "We all live in a brown sub-marine..." :-) Maybe we should pull a Cecil, switch horses, and be part of the in-crowd. I wonder if Steve will still focus on male genitalia, homosexuality, and pedophilia? I certainly hope that that kind of thinking is his independent thoughts and not a trait shared by all PCTA. I guess your condoning of Lennie's "olde-tyme hamme" and "brown sub-marine" comments are part of YOUR "civil discourse", Brain? I don't recall commenting on it. Why? And we've already proven who the gentalia focused pedophile-prone one is here, Brain... And it's NOT me... Steve. K4YZ Steve, you've just made an interesting statement. You do realize that as a "medical professional" you are REQUIRED by law to report cases of child abuse and child sexual abuse. Also, you say "we've already proven..." Are you implicating others of having knowledge of these crimes? You guys might want to get a conference call going and decide who's in and who's out before committing "them" to your situation. There is a legal penality for not reporting what you know, what "we" know. Remember, you say that you have proof, so you must report. But there are penalties for libel. Best of Luck. |
On 10 Sep 2004 17:35:34 GMT, (Len Over 21) wrote:
In article , Gareeb writes: On 9 Sep 2004 19:04:03 -0700, (William) wrote: Cecil is off in other newsgroups. I'm sure he got sick and tired of the PCTA regulars in here. :-) Welp, he tried to appease them by joining in one of their CW nets, but they still crapped on him. Then he joined them, but was so distraught by that action he left the group. A fitting closure for this egocentric, confused, whining, alleged (self-proclaimed) "genius" who was, by and large, the hemmeroid of rrap, that is to say, a major pain in the ass sponsored by Intel corp. "Gareeb" (another anonymouse) who wasn't here, wasn't there, wasn't much of anywhere...seems to want to vent. Ha ha ha , stick it where the sun don't shine you old retired fool. I was here in 1995 which is way before you joined or even knew about the existence of usenet (I think you first showed your ugly face in 1997 when aol performed the ultimate insult to the internet community by availing usenet available to its 'members', who would otherwise have no clue as to how to get here). Cecil thought quite highly of himself, all you had to do was ask him. Your greatest accomplishment in life is 30 years of 1 years experience. I will say that Cecil did have the intellect to learn code (or at least how to pass the test), you can't even do that. Get out of my face aol'er. As we used to say in those days, find a real ISP. Come to think of it, it occurs to me that there may be a relationship between aol'ers and those who can't learn code. Hmmmm.... |
Len Over 21 wrote:
In article , Dave Heil writes: What can I say about your typical behavior here except to ask: "are you having too much fun peeing in the pool?" --Leonard H. Anderson Tsk. You still haven't answered any questions. Too hard for you? :-) Double Tsk. You still haven't passed an amateur radio exam at any level. Too hard for you? :-) How come there's a disagreement between Quitefine's numbers and those on the www.hamdata.com site? Feel free to ask "Quitefine" or the folks at www.hamdata.com. [the thread subject is "ARS License Numbers"] Would you really like me to go back through google and come up with the total number of your posts to the thread which are on topic? No doubt Quitefine MUST jump in here to "defend his honor" or whatever he thinks makes him always right... :-) Are you speaking from experience, Lennie boy? :-) Dave K8MN |
|
On 11 Sep 2004 09:22:17 -0700, (Hans K0HB)
wrote: Cecil is a grown boy (he's been licensed since even before Len was a sojer), a free thinker, and not at all the type to be "dogged" into doing something he doesn't want to by a bunch of twits on rrap. Since you are on rrap, that would make you a twit as well? |
"Gareeb" wrote Cecil is a grown boy (he's been licensed since even before Len was a sojer), a free thinker, and not at all the type to be "dogged" into doing something he doesn't want to by a bunch of twits on rrap. Since you are on rrap, that would make you a twit as well? Yup, pretty much all of us, and especially anonymous twits like you. Sunuvagun! With kindest personal regards, de Hans, K0HB |
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:06:58 GMT, "KØHB"
wrote: "Gareeb" wrote Cecil is a grown boy (he's been licensed since even before Len was a sojer), a free thinker, and not at all the type to be "dogged" into doing something he doesn't want to by a bunch of twits on rrap. Since you are on rrap, that would make you a twit as well? Yup, pretty much all of us, and especially anonymous twits like you. Ok, so we are all twits except for your man Cecil (I would assume you are implying that Cecil was not a twit). Is this because he could not be dogged? Or is it because he was a grown boy (understatement of the years based on pictures I have seen, especially in terms of abdominal growth). Your friend in kindness, Gareeb |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:09 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com