| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Robert Casey" wrote in message ... I was thinking of the part where you have to decide when and what to add, multiply, etc. Most 3 credit classes are harder, but I had a few that were "give-aways". Maybe I should say "as hard as an easier hour test taken early in a freshman college class". Robert, All I can add here is that any Ohm's law problems I've seen have perhaps two resistors in parallel with the combination in series with a third. That hardly compares with first year college material with a modest network of resistors (perhaps 12 or so) and a couple of different emf sources thrown in - and you solve for the current and direction in one of the resistors (first year, D.C. It gets worse, of course LOL). Ah .... 1st year physics. Hmmm ... calculus was involved here. I don't ever recall anything of that magnatude in an amateur radio exam. I also doubt a 7 year old would likely pass such physics exams. While I have no problem with the elimination of Morse code, nor have I a problem with an easy entry level license, I am rather perplexed with the continued insistance that the tests are too hard. I am also somewhat surprised at a free ride of either codeless techs or tech plusses being moved to general. The only techs which got the free ride were the techs from years ago who took the general theory. The only difference was the 5 words per minute vs the 13 words per minute of the general class license. When the code requirement was dropped to 5 words per minute, the old techs had already passed the entire exam for new general class licensees. Hmmmm .... come to think of it, they didn't get a 'free' ride - they passed the same elements as newly issued general class licenses. Just my thoughts ... 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.656 / Virus Database: 421 - Release Date: 4/9/04 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... [snip] While I have no problem with the elimination of Morse code, nor have I a problem with an easy entry level license, I am rather perplexed with the continued insistance that the tests are too hard. I am also somewhat surprised at a free ride of either codeless techs or tech plusses being moved to general. The only techs which got the free ride were the techs from years ago who took the general theory. The only difference was the 5 words per minute vs the 13 words per minute of the general class license. When the code requirement was dropped to 5 words per minute, the old techs had already passed the entire exam for new general class licensees. Hmmmm ... come to think of it, they didn't get a 'free' ride - they passed the same elements as newly issued general class licenses. Just my thoughts ... And keep in mind that that upgrade isn't exactly "free". They have to take the time and energy to find or get the necessary proof of license, find a test session, show up at said test session, and process the paperwork. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... [snip] While I have no problem with the elimination of Morse code, nor have I a problem with an easy entry level license, I am rather perplexed with the continued insistance that the tests are too hard. I am also somewhat surprised at a free ride of either codeless techs or tech plusses being moved to general. The only techs which got the free ride were the techs from years ago who took the general theory. The only difference was the 5 words per minute vs the 13 words per minute of the general class license. When the code requirement was dropped to 5 words per minute, the old techs had already passed the entire exam for new general class licensees. Hmmmm ... come to think of it, they didn't get a 'free' ride - they passed the same elements as newly issued general class licenses. Just my thoughts ... And keep in mind that that upgrade isn't exactly "free". They have to take the time and energy to find or get the necessary proof of license, find a test session, show up at said test session, and process the paperwork. Actually there's no need at all to do that. All the FCC needs to do is change the rules to reflect that all Techs licenses are now General and they will be reissued as General as they individually expire and are renewed. The same would be true for Advanced to Extra, and, if the NCVEC petition wins out with the new entry license being "Communicator" then existing Novice licenses would be equivalent to Communicator and renewed as such when the current license expired. There is NO immediate need for any paperwork to happen at all. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bill Sohl" wrote in message ink.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message ... "Jim Hampton" wrote in message ... [snip] While I have no problem with the elimination of Morse code, nor have I a problem with an easy entry level license, I am rather perplexed with the continued insistance that the tests are too hard. I am also somewhat surprised at a free ride of either codeless techs or tech plusses being moved to general. The only techs which got the free ride were the techs from years ago who took the general theory. The only difference was the 5 words per minute vs the 13 words per minute of the general class license. When the code requirement was dropped to 5 words per minute, the old techs had already passed the entire exam for new general class licensees. Hmmmm ... come to think of it, they didn't get a 'free' ride - they passed the same elements as newly issued general class licenses. Just my thoughts ... And keep in mind that that upgrade isn't exactly "free". They have to take the time and energy to find or get the necessary proof of license, find a test session, show up at said test session, and process the paperwork. Actually there's no need at all to do that. All the FCC needs to do is change the rules to reflect that all Techs licenses are now General and they will be reissued as General as they individually expire and are renewed. The same would be true for Advanced to Extra, and, if the NCVEC petition wins out with the new entry license being "Communicator" then existing Novice licenses would be equivalent to Communicator and renewed as such when the current license expired. There is NO immediate need for any paperwork to happen at all. Cheers, Bill K2UNK If the goal is simplification of number of classes, then there would indeed be a need to do the upgrades enmass. Otherwise the closed classes could hang on for up to 10 years, which nearly negates the simplification process. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Do we really need a new Novice class? | Policy | |||
| Low reenlistment rate | Policy | |||
| There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate HF according to FCC Rules | General | |||
| ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
| Hey CBers Help Get rid of Morse Code Test and Requirement | Policy | |||