LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #13   Report Post  
Old January 19th 05, 06:02 AM
Lenof21
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article t, robert casey
writes:

Morse was a treaty requirement. Which has gone away.
It's just that the FCC hasn't gotten around to changing
the rules on it yet. They're more concerned about
wardrobe malfunctions and whatnot.....


"Wardrobe malfunctions?" You mean like the "socks" that the
Coslonaut was wanting to talk about? Oh, my.

Strange, but there's no mention of "socks" on the FCC pages.



Posted on 18 Jan 05
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No anticipated changes in Morse Requirement for a while Mike Coslo Policy 44 January 17th 05 03:52 AM
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) N2EY Policy 6 December 2nd 03 03:45 AM
The Morse Code Requirement - Is It Really The Reason People Turn Away? Len Over 21 Policy 28 August 17th 03 03:30 AM
Some comments on the NCVEC petition D. Stussy Policy 13 August 5th 03 04:23 AM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 03:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:00 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017