Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#142
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
|
#143
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
|
#144
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
wrote: wrote: From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm wrote: From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41 wrote: From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am Amateur radio might be operating weak signal UHF SSB with a multi-mode, multi-band rig. It might be operating 2m FM through a local repeater. It might be ragchewing on 40m CW. One constant is that you aren't involved. I don't do any RF transmission in amateur bands, with the exception of those bands which are shared with other radio services. That's a very good thing! Why? Because if you did "RF transmission in amateur bands" without the proper license, you could be breaking the law, Len. That would be a very bad thing. not to condone the full range of freebanding but isn't this sentment going a bit far generating RF in Ham Bands without a license should be relitively low on the rangeof Good/Bad stuff Murder is generaly very bad cut Worldwide? I don't think so. DIRECT from a government radio transmitter. Are you authorized to do so? why is it your place to ask? cut. Then why do you fuss with morse and standards that are over 70 years old? The standards are a lot newer than "70 years old", Len. not realy cut |
#145
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote: From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm wrote: From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41 wrote: From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am DIRECT as in laying on of hands, moving controls, operating, all that stuff. I get the feeling that your knowledge of radio operating might be a little light. Are you of the opinion that operating a radio falls under "all that stuff"? Len does not consider "operating skills" to be of much (if any) value. You sure talk about it a lot, though. You were born before 1951? YOU talked much of it in previous post. YOU have talked much about Reggie Fessenden and his carbon-mike-in- the-antenna "AM voice transmission" of 1906 and (allegedly) 1900. Are you 105 years old?!? You've written about Fessenden a number of times. Aren't you nearly thirty-five years shy of 105? All that noise is Len's diversion from the fact that Fessenden was transmitting understandable voice by radio in 1900, and by November 1906 had reliable two-way transatlantic *voice* communication working. When Len doesn't like facts, he goes for the messenger. Jimmy Noserve loves the past, always bringing up little factoids of amateur radio history that happened before his time. See? Just like that. Gee, Len, you're always bringing up little factoids of history that happened before *your* time. When did MY "time" begin, Jimmy? My "first radio job" in HF comms began in 1953. I was there then, did it, came back. Never used any morse code then on three dozen transmitters, never had to. ...and because you never had to (in your time), no one should be using morse code in this enlightened day and age? That about sums it up. Radio and electronics have some things in common, but they are not identical, and one is not a subset of the other. Amateur radio definitions seldom jibe with the rest of the world of electronics...and radio. :-) They seem to track pretty well, Len. You, on the other hand, haven't done very well in here with definitions. "Usenet"...."UCMJ"....... The sole manual test for anything at any amateur license exam is about telegraphy, telegraphy as used on amateur radio (there is NO landline telegraphy tested), more technically, radiotelegraphy. As it is NOW, that is. And that's a good thing. It is a "good thing" only to those that took that test and passed it, thus fulfilling the "proper jump through hoops" of "tradition." :-) That sounds like sour grapes on your part, Leonard. Those of us who took and passed such an exam demonstrated that we'd reached a certain level of competence in what is a useful skill in amateur radio. Like I said about Len not valuing operating skills.... The written test elements are prepared, both questions and multiple-choice question answers, by the VEC QPC. And approved by the FCC Who else? :-) YOU are NOT in the FCC. I didn't see any statement by Jim that he's the FCC. Am I saying that many radio amateurs don't know squat about radio theory? ABSOLUTELY. Your opinion only. And as you have demonstrated, you are not exactly unbiased in your opinions. Yes, MY OPINION! :-) Do you think someone else is writing all this? :-) It would seem to be that you've not bothered to substantiate your opinion with fact. How many is many? How many radio amateurs have you encountered who are deficient. What percentage of all licensed radio amateurs do they represent? Most important of all - what level would be adequate? And what has Len done to make hams reach that level? (Recommending an age requirement doesn't cut it). Many radio amateurs know much more about radio theory than you, Len. Why is that a factor in AMATEUR radio? I'd think it'd be something to crow about. I think many folks would be pleased to know more about radio theory than a PROFESSIONAL. The "National Association for Amateur Radio" (nee' ARRL) is the "club." Even so, their membership is only one of every five U.S. amateur radio licensees. Why aren't there more? Some disagree with League policies Some think membership costs too much. Some are inactive Some don't understand why a national organization is needed. You have taken a Poll to confirm this? :-) You can take it upon yourself to conduct one, Len. If you weren't prepared to accept Jim's answers, why'd you pose the question? Jimmy boy, YOU are a League BELIEVER. You are so far into bias on that that all you generate are square waves. Well, Lennie boy, what is it that you believe in? Do you believe that the ARRL is an evil organization? You've leveled charges of dishonesty toward the League, but you never substantiated them. I'd almost forgotten that. btw, No-Code International's membership is less than 1% of US amateurs even though there are no dues and NCI membership never expires. Highly irrelevant. NCI is NOT a "national association for amateur radio." No, it isn't. Can you name any such organization except for the ARRL? It exists for ONE purpose: Elimination of the code test from amateur radio license examinations worldwide. That's it. There seems to have been at least one exception to that stated purpose already. Actually, at least two: NCI opposed "weak signal" subbands on the 50, 144 and 432 MHz bands. The proposal was intended to create subbands where Morse Code, SSB, PSK31 and other relatively-narrow-bandwidth signals would be free of QRM from FM and other wider-bandwidth signals. Had absolutely *nothing* to do with Morse Code testing, yet NCI opposed it. NCI also supported an ARRL proposal that would have given automatic free upgrades to a significant number of amateurs by waiving the *written* tests for those upgrades. Again, had absolutely *nothing* to do with Morse Code testing, yet NCI supported it. You have no activity in amateur radio and except for one outburst almost six years ago, there's no indication you'll ever get an amateur license. "Outburst?!?" BWAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I prefer to call it an episode of braggadocio. It has come back to haunt you repeatedly. Jan 19, 2000, as Lenof21 IIRC. (Len has had multiple screen names here for some unfathomable reason). Why, oh WHY must I show "an indication of interest?!?" One reason could be that you'd be seen as something other than a sidewalk superintendent in amateur radio. If you have no interest, as you've alternately claimed, you are irrelevant to amateur radio and you become a kook who haunts an amateur radio newsgroup. Who the fork are you to presume *I* MUST demonstrate to YOU some kind of committment and dedication?!?!? "Commitment", Len. Nobody forces you to show commitment or dedication. You needn't obtain or even attempt to obtain an amateur radio license. If you don't, you won't appear to be very credible. Your extensive rants will be marginalized. You'll be in the same boat as a certain English teacher. Actually the English teacher is more credible because she admits her lack of involvement and interest. If your ego is THAT big, then you should go over to Coslo's BBS since you will "reach the threashold of space" long before his big balloon will... Are you telling him to leave, Len? So you and the English teacher have the same level of involvement. Nope. I am as involved as can be with my wife. None other. ...and you wife isn't amateur radio. ZIC/ZID. As a bachelor I had an "involvement" with an English teacher, a very nice one, in fact. Sure, Leonard, and you're getting an "Extra right out of the box". Try to think about marriage for YOU, Jimmy. It would make you less of a one-track Believer. When it was said that you have the same level of involvement as the English teacher, you said, "I am as involved as can be with my wife. None other". Here you seem to indicate that marriage makes one "less of a one-track Believer". You can't even agree with you. You're not a licensee and and except for one outburst almost six years ago, there's no indication you'll ever get an amateur license. Oh, oh, there goes that control-freak EGO again, Jimmy. Nobody is controlling you, including yourself. You shot off your mouth when you made your boast six years ago. You haven't lived up to that billing. Suppose the FCC does drop Element 1 (which is really quite likely). Does anyone think Len will become a ham, set up a station, and get on the air? Work on that. It's bad socially. If you think that's bad socially, you should be in the shoes of one who shoots off his yap, saying he's going to do something, but who doesn't follow through. Perhaps the FCC chuckles over your comments, Len. Irrelevant. Chances are they will take my comments seriously. I don't think you should make that assumption, Len. Doesn't matter, the PUBLIC has spoken to the FCC 3,794 times through WT Docket 05-235. It matters. How many times were you "the public" in regard to 05-235? Of the members of the PUBLIC who spoke, how many (excluding you) didn't share your view? Tsk, tsk, you DO! See little gems of an accusatory nature such as I should have obtained an amateur radio license before accepting professional radio employment! Who wrote that? Dave Heil. Why aren't you paying ATTENTION to the flow? :-( You've made another factual error, Leonard. You seem to be the person who needs to pay ATTENTION. See, this is what I mean when I say that you make frequent factual errors. I invite you to tune your Icom receiver to the low ends of the bands 160-10m this coming weekend. Why? I have no personal interest in morse code and no interest in amateur radio contesting. Invitation denied. Afraid you'll be proven wrong? Tsk, there you go again with nasty attitude. An evangelical Believer, wet proselyte for a battery of morse gods, an acidic base. I offered a simple experiment. You declined. You shrunk from the challenge. Jimmy boy, I'm quite aware of the EM spectrum and who occupies what "bands." Well, Lennie boy, you'll find those radio amateur morse signals at the low end of the bands marked "160, 80, 40, 20, 15 and 10 meters" this weekend. They're there all the time but you'll find them in profusion this weekend. Len doesn't listen. Have been for a very long time...ever since getting my "first job in radio." I know spectrum occupany OUTSIDE of the ham bands on HF, on MF, on VHF, on UHF, and on up to 2.4 GHz. WHAT are YOU going to tell ME? It'd be tough to reach you. You spend too much time with your transmitter on and not enough time using the receiver. That contests are "popular?" I could find that out by seeing the boosterism for that in print in CQ or QST. Was the intent to prove that contests are popular or was it to show that morse code is alive and well in amateur radio? Is contesting "operation" your main interest in amateur radio? Are you more interested in awards, trophies, pretty certificates than radio for radio's sake? It sure sounds like it since you love getting praise, even from friends and neighbors. :-) What would any of that be to you, Len? You aren't in amateur radio and you wouldn't even turn on your receiver to find if the morse code is alive and well. This Thursday and Friday I was involved in Thanksgiving in the literal sense. Good friends got together, didn't talk at all about amateur radio or morse code. Sunday is another nice get-together with good people, and I don't expect any of the talk will be about amateur radio or morse code or contests or the beeping state of the radio art. No "contests" of any real kind. Sunnuvagun! I went to an apple festival this fall. No one there talked about amateur radio or morse code. Is that supposed to prove that morse code is dead? I didn't hear a single person there discussing NASA, Darwin or jazz either. Have fun in your amateur beeping contests. Those sound very, Very, VERY important to you. Enjoy. Thanks for your good wishes. Those things are far more important to me than obtaining an amateur radio license seems to be for you. Your participation is not required. Len's hobby is wasting time. Your time. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
#146
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm wrote: From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41 wrote: From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am DIRECT as in laying on of hands, moving controls, operating, all that stuff. I get the feeling that your knowledge of radio operating might be a little light. Are you of the opinion that operating a radio falls under "all that stuff"? Len does not consider "operating skills" to be of much (if any) value. a fair enough assesment of len views but your point cut |
#147
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
From: on Nov 27, 7:21 am
wrote: From: on Sat, Nov 26 2005 4:49 pm Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Tues, Nov 22 2005 8:12 pm Hmmm...not a brand I recognize in this corner of the USA. The "Newman's Own" line of food products may not be popular farther east in the USA? I've tried "Newman's Own" Ranch dressing but personally prefer the "Hidden Valley" brand for Ranch dressing. I had you pegged as a "Hidden Agenda" man. Says "Sun-dried Tomato" from WV. Squash him before he spoils everything... Too late. He's gone balsamic on us. ...forever sour and bitter... :-) That may have been the topic in the cozy lodge or it may have been your tiny, old, dusty Johnson. That Anderson Powerpole bit may be a bit of self-aggrandizement on your part. Everyone seems to have "thier" own opinion on the subject. "Obvioulsy" Anyway, probably a better solution than a twisted pair and a wire nut. ;^) Tsk, Davie missed the discussion on Anderson PowerPole connectors for mobile and portable radio installations that went on for quite a while in rec.radio.amateur.homebrew. I think he should have jumped right in and sprinkled his usual balsamic vinegar in there...showing everyone his mighty radioness... :-) Marinated herring is pretty good with rye bread, but kippers became the IN thing for breakfast in jolly old UK. The British Isles had the blue face paint thing. See the fictious film biography of Scotsman William Wallace in "Braveheart." That wasn't factual? Names and dates were correct. The rest is up to history buffs of the northern British Isles... Heil wishes to have all who disagree with him drawn and quartered in the manner of William Wallace? [with the five remaining body parts buried in far-distant locations?] Is there a CQ WWW this weekend? Never heard of it. :-) Maybe John Dorr could shed some light on your "assertion of fact." Don't let the Dorr hit Davie's assertion on the way out... A free issue of World Radio magazine showed up in my mail last week. One editorial had some interesting things to say about emergency comms (or is that "coms?") being incompatible with a rtty contest. shrug Morse code MUST shine forever and ever just as it did in 1912. Radio amateurs have always been first responders in each and every emergency/disaster with their miraculous CW rigs that managed to survive when the entire infrastructure of commercial/professional communications failed. Ergo, cellphones are no huckin good for anything. :-) |
#148
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm
wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm wrote: From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41 wrote: From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am DIRECT as in laying on of hands, moving controls, operating, all that stuff. I get the feeling that your knowledge of radio operating might be a little light. Are you of the opinion that operating a radio falls under "all that stuff"? Len does not consider "operating skills" to be of much (if any) value. a fair enough assesment of len views I disagree, Mark. I do not consider a RADIOTELEGRAPHY TEST to be any "operating skill" worthy of being part of an amateur radio operator's license. The FCC has had that viewpoint. They said so in public documents. Stupor-patriot morsemen think morse code telegraphy skills are all that is "operating skill." |
#149
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
From: on Nov 27, 3:55 pm
wrote: From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm wrote: From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41 wrote: From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am Because if you did "RF transmission in amateur bands" without the proper license, you could be breaking the law, Len. That would be a very bad thing. Feel free to attempt a citizens' arrest any time... :-) I get along with all sorts of people, Len. Including many who disagree with me. Not absolutely true... :-) You're the one that has the problem getting along with others if they don't agree with everything you say. Tsk, with Jimmy it's always the other guy's fault... :-) DIRECT from a maritime transceiver as a civilian. Worldwide? I don't think so. Depends on the ionosphere... :-) DIRECT from a government radio transmitter. Are you authorized to do so? Yes. :-) DIRECT as in laying on of hands, moving controls, operating, all that stuff. Neither of those are *your* equipment, licensed to *you*, are they? No problem on whose radios those are..."direct operation" is just doing as I said... :-) The standards are a lot newer than "70 years old", Len. Name some. The morse code test has been in amateur radio regulations for 71 years. :-) As to why anyone would fuss with Morse Code in 2005, the reasons are the same as why anyone would fuss with: - cars that have manual transmissions instead of automatics No problem to me...I learned to drive in a manual-transmission auto. Didn't have to know morse code to drive... - sailboats instead of power boats Sailing under the wind takes much less fuel than power boats...and it is nice to do. didn't have to know morse code to sail. - Drawing and painting instead of photography No problem to me...I did all three as a kid, still do. Didn't have to know morse code to do any of those three. - Performing music instead of playing recordings Tsk, how do you think recordings got to BE recordings? :-) No morse code knowledge required in music. - Bicycles, running and walking for transport instead of motor vehicles No problem to me. Last California DMV retest (and every one before that) didn't require any morse code skill. - Stairs instead of elevators How do you categorize escalators? :-) No morse code knowledge required for stairs, escalators, or elevators. - Homemade food instead of packaged How do you categorize campfire cooking? :-) Cooking doesn't require morse code knowledge. Because I know something of those times and the creation of the Extra class license. Ah, but you weren't THERE in all those times... :-) YOU have talked much about Reggie Fessenden and his carbon-mike-in- the-antenna "AM voice transmission" of 1906 and (allegedly) 1900. That's right. Was any of my information incorrect? Weren't you reading from your own lab notes when you described all that happening 99 to 105 years ago? :-) Show me ANY evidence that ANY AM transmitter since 1906 has used amplitude modulation via a carbon microphone in series with the antenna lead... :-) I was there then, did it, came back. Never used any morse code then on three dozen transmitters, never had to. Because you were a transmitter technician, not a radio operator. That's not what the U.S. Army said. :-) Wasn't a single morse code "operating" facility in that whole large station, Jimmy. It's odd that you take pride in what you did *not* do... You betcha...I took pride in NOT breaking any regulations or Articles in the UCMJ. :-) It sure does seem that you talk about things that happened long before you were born, but get mad when others talk about things that happened long before *they* were born. As if it's OK for you to do but not others. Tsk, I was 20 years old in 1953, Jimmy. Already been born two decades prior. :-) "Radio" is a subset of electrical engineering. Incorrect. It is a part of electronics, a technology discipline. Nope. It's a separate subset. Electronics does not include things like antennas. Radio does. Are "antennas" a whole separate field of physics? :-) "Electronics" is a subset of electrical engineering. INCORRECT. What parts of electronics are not covered by electrical engineering, Len? Tsk, tsk, trying to get around your gaffe by bringing in "engineering?" :-) Electronics is one TECHNOLOGY DISCIPLINE of physics. No, it isn't. Physics is a science. Electrical engineering is a form of engineering, and electronics is a subset of that. Sigh...you still haven't gotten the correct definitions... :-( Your mistakes (like the ones Hans pointed out about DD-214s) are embarrassing. You are confused. I made NO mistake about DD-214s. I have one. You don't have one, can never have one... Radio and electronics have some things in common, but they are not identical, and one is not a subset of the other. Amateur radio definitions seldom jibe with the rest of the world of electronics...and radio. :-) Yours don't jive with anything - like your spelling. The word "jibe" (with a B, not a V) is perfectly correct in my context. Look it up. :-) NPRM 05-143 is singularly about the telegraphy test. [that's what this "english teacher" of the thread title was commenting on] That NPRM has NOTHING to do with radiotelephony, radiodata, teletypewriter over radio, slow or fast-scan television, facsimile over radio. The amateur radio license tests have NO test elements for physically OPERATING any radio, are not required to have radio equipment AT a license exam site. So? Why is that significant? Why do you consider yourself so "significant?" :-) It's not about me, Len. Tsk, everything you post in here is about YOU. :-) The sole manual test for anything at any amateur license exam is about telegraphy, telegraphy as used on amateur radio (there is NO landline telegraphy tested), more technically, radiotelegraphy. As it is NOW, that is. And that's a good thing. It is a "good thing" only to those that took that test and passed it, thus fulfilling the "proper jump through hoops" of "tradition." :-) Incorrect. There were comments to the FCC by people who had not passed the Morse Code test which said it was a good thing and should be retained. Sorry, Jimmy, they were outnumbered by those who wanted the TEST gone. :-) If you actually read all of the comments, you'd know that. Each and every filing from 15 July 2005 to 23 November 2005. 3,795 of them. :-) When you make a sweeping general statement, and someone proves an exception, the statement is shown to be false. That's basic logic. No, Jimmy, all that proves is EXCEPTIONS. :-) There's NO "logic" in your exceptions statements, only spite... YOU are NOT in the FCC. Neither are you, Len. YOU are NOT in the FCC. Never were. It doesn't look like you will ever be in the FCC... Tsk, your definition of "polite" seems to be everyone agreeing with you and giving your gratuitous praise for whatever you do. Nope. That's *your* definition. Tsk, another morseman with the "mirror syndrome" displayed. Whatever will your friends and neighbors think? :-) FCC does not consider *you* to be qualified to operate an amateur radio station, though. Wrong on two accounts. First of all, I already got a Commercial Radiotelephone license 49 years ago so the FCC "qualified" me (legally) to do so. Secondly, I've never tested for any amateur radio license so the FCC cannot say I am either "qualified" or "unqualified." Third, by law, to operate ON THE FREQUENCIES allocated only to radio amateurs requires an amateur radio license, neither "qualification" or "unqualification" but just a condition of the regulations. limited. NOT "all sorts of equipment" either since there are exceptions stated in Part 97. Look those up. Don't have to look them up, I know them. Try a dictionary...look up "jibe." :-) It's understandable that you'd not understand a superior intellect, Len When one shows up, I'll be sure NOT to understand them. OTOH I understand you all too well. That's why you're so hostile to me. "Hostile?" What you mean "hostile," white man? Po' bebbe, y'all been trin' ta shoot down all them NCTAs fer years and ya dint do it. Tsk, tsk. All dat HOSTILE in-tent of yourn. You have taken a Poll to confirm this? :-) Yes ;-) Prove that. Len, you're and NCI BELIEVER. You're so biased that you cannot conduct enough to see what really happens. Oh, my, you are doing the word-twisting thing today! I was against the code test long before Bruce Perens put NCI together. Pay attention. I don't speak FOR NCI but you are going to try to MISDIRECT the thread flow to make that a cause celebre'. Not buying that. Who the fork are you to presume *I* MUST demonstrate to YOU some kind of committment and dedication?!?!? Who do I have to be? A normal, logical person instead of the behavior you display here. Try to think about marriage for YOU, Jimmy. It would make you less of a one-track Believer. Len, for all you know, I could have more marriage experience than you have. Judging by all the time you spend in here...I'd say you have NO "experience" right now. :-) Or you don't really work for a living (thereby getting more free time to surf the newsgroup). You are already in the Dudly the Imposter category, saying so many things yet not proving them. Yes, Len, your control-freak ego sure does go off at times. Telling everyone How It Should Be. Tsk, more mirror gazing on your part, Jimmy. All I'm doing - in between replying to some of the PCTA heckling - is trying to get rid of the code test. You've already taken that test, will never have to test for it again unless you miss the last renewal date and expire that license. YOU are telling ALL NEWCOMERS to test for morse code. You've been doing that for years. Why are you so hostile to newcomers? Afraid you'll be proven wrong? Tsk, there you go again with nasty attitude. IOW, yes, you're afraid. You are nuts. Have been for a very long time...ever since getting my "first job in radio." So you're old. Big deal. You want a merit badge? At the end of my "first job in radio" I got a DD-214. You don't have one. You will never have one of your own. You are too old. WHAT are YOU going to tell ME? That Morse Code is alive and well in the amateur bands. Wonderful for you, then. You will always have a morseman to play with. Is contesting "operation" your main interest in amateur radio? One of my main interests in amateur radio. I have several. You don't seem to have any. "It must drive you nuts not knowing" what my interests are... :-) Considering your near-complete ignorance of Morse Code and amateur radio, it's a good thing you didn't talk about those subjects. "Near-complete ignorance?!?" insert three lines of Dudly cackling in here Sunday is another nice get-together with good people, and I don't expect any of the talk will be about amateur radio or morse code or contests or the beeping state of the radio art. That's good, considering that you're hardly a good role model. "Hardly a good role model?!?" Tsk, tsk, that is HOSTILITY, Jimmy. Why are you so hostile? No "contests" of any real kind. Sunnuvagun! Can't take the competition, huh? Try to understand that normal social behavior is NOT about "competition." Normal, that is, not some HOSTILE type who always has to sound more important than the group...such behavior exemplified by the PCTA. This past weekend I hosted Thanksgiving for 12 people ? friends and family. What has that to do with amateur radio? I cooked a 21 pound turkey with homemade stuffing, made homemade bread, did it up right. Others did the vegetables and desserts. Do you want a BSA cooking merit badge for that? Can you cook, Len? Of course I can...do you need lessons? |
#150
|
|||
|
|||
Windy Anderson's 11/14 Reply to Comments
wrote: From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm wrote: Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm wrote: From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41 wrote: From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am DIRECT as in laying on of hands, moving controls, operating, all that stuff. I get the feeling that your knowledge of radio operating might be a little light. Are you of the opinion that operating a radio falls under "all that stuff"? Len does not consider "operating skills" to be of much (if any) value. a fair enough assesment of len views I disagree, Mark. I do not consider a RADIOTELEGRAPHY TEST to be any "operating skill" worthy of being part of an amateur radio operator's license. my apologies I was trying to simply agee on paper with Jim as a Retorical tactic I was also accepting the screwed up procode difer that says Cw test was the same as operating skill (just tryin some hypothecials to see if Jim could get past the nonsense or if Jim is as traped as Stevie and Dave The FCC has had that viewpoint. They said so in public documents. Stupor-patriot morsemen think morse code telegraphy skills are all that is "operating skill." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Power Industry BPL Reply Comments & Press Release | Antenna | |||
Power Industry BPL Reply Comments & Press Release | Antenna | |||
BPL pollution - file reply comments by August 6 | Antenna | |||
BPL pollution – file reply comments by August 6 | Antenna | |||
BPL interference - reply comments - YOUR ACTION REQUIRED | Antenna |