ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty
Dave Heil wrote:
It should come as no surprise that Len Anderson's eight pages of
pontificating, self-important reply to the comments of Robert G.
Rightsell read almost exactly like his frequent pontificating,
self-important rants in r.r.a.p.

"Craft", "guild", "union", "self-styled elite group of traditionalists",
they're all there. Len's obligatory references to his military
experience of more than a half-century ago are there, but he carefully
reworked his "24/7" statement so that he personally isn't described as
having worked 24 hours per day for a week.

Leonard's remarks are carefully loaded with numerous references to
copious footnotes. One lets the Commission in on what PROFESSIONAL
periodicals he receives. Another tells the Commission of the woeful
failure of Fessenden's experiments in the use of amplitude modulated
telephony.

In typical Andersonesque fashion, Len calls some of Rightsell's comments
"not only egregious but an outright insult, not only to those of us who
worked responsibly in radio communications long ago, but to all the
planners of radio communications *in every other service except radio
amateurism* since the end of World War 2. [Isn't it supposed to be
"World War II"?] Len opines, "To be blunt, Mr. Rightsell engages in
self-puffery and nonsense". Additionally, our Leonard provides the
Commissioner's a lecture in a rundown of decade by decade progress in
the development of radio.

Len can't resist a few jabs at Joe Speroni's talley of comments on
05-235. He makes certain that the Commission is aware that Speroni is
"an unabashed proponent of radiotelegraphy in amateur radio, and has
been so for years" as if it were an unknown that Mr. Anderson is an
unabashed proponent of doing away with morse code exam in amateur radio
(and has been such for years).

Leonard H. Anderson, despite his self-declared several decades of
interest in amateur radio, nine years or so of posts to r.r.a.p and a
claim that he was going for an "Extra right out of the box" is *still
not a radio amateur*. On the positive side for Mr. Anderson, he is
still holding on to his tiny, dusty Johnson.

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:
ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty

CIVIC DUTY...?!?!?

BBBWWWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA HAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

I "dared" to challenge one of Lennie's comments to the FCC in
EXACTLY the same manner and he went on for Y E A R S about how I
allegedly tried to challenge his "right" to seek redress from the
government! ! ! !

Lennie goes one further! He actually "WARNS" the commentor about
HIS comments IN THE REPLY TO THE FCC ! ! ! ! ! !

WTF is LENNIE to "WARN" anyone...?!?! He doesn't even qualify to
be a school crossing guard!

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:
ah I guess Dave does not like american doing their civic duty

CIVIC DUTY...?!?!?

yes civic duty
cuting stevie crying

I "dared" to challenge one of Lennie's comments to the FCC in
EXACTLY the same manner and he went on for Y E A R S about how I
allegedly tried to challenge his "right" to seek redress from the
government! ! ! !

becuase you did

you tried to get the FCC to violate the Consititution of the US becuase
you don't like Len anderson. Personaly I am glad you did, made anything
else you tired to say all but unread


Lennie goes one further! He actually "WARNS" the commentor about
HIS comments IN THE REPLY TO THE FCC ! ! ! ! ! !

WTF is LENNIE to "WARN" anyone...?!?! He doesn't even qualify to
be a school crossing guard!

rant away Stevie boy

all you are doing is proving that you do not respect the Constitution
or the process of law

There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

Steve, K4YZ

On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

snip
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself


ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!







----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

snip
There is ABSOLUTELY NOTHING "civic" about Lennie's intent or
comments. It was nothing but hateful bile polished by self-promoting
pontification.

showing do you don't know the meaning of the word "civic"

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself


ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

it is funny i suppose in some sence that it needs to be evn stated is
not as funny








----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

an old friend wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself

ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

it is funny i suppose in some sence that it needs to be evn stated is
not as funny

"Bogot" is funny in many "sences".

Dave K8MN

an old friend wrote:

it is funny i suppose in some sence that it needs to be evn stated is
not as funny

What's "funny" is your abuse of the King's English in an attempt
to discuss "civics".

Steve, K4YZ

K4YZ wrote:
an old friend wrote:

it is funny i suppose in some sence that it needs to be evn stated is
not as funny

What's "funny" is your abuse of the King's English in an attempt
to discuss "civics".

Steve, K4YZ

Let "The King" enforce his English.

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself


ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

Yeah. I found the word "bogot" kind of amusing myself.

Dave K8MN

On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 18:24:34 GMT, Dave Heil wrote
in et:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 16 Nov 2005 07:52:58 -0800, "an old friend"
wrote in .com:

Civic" duty does not imply any requirement to agree with a narrow
minded proven bogot like yourself


ROTFLMMFAO!!!!!

Yeah. I found the word "bogot" kind of amusing myself.


And here comes Dave to the rescue!

So how do you like being Major Dud's lapdog?










----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----