From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm


wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am

DIRECT as in laying on of hands,
moving controls, operating, all that stuff.

I get the feeling that your knowledge of radio operating might be a
little light. Are you of the opinion that operating a radio falls under
"all that stuff"?

Len does not consider "operating skills" to be of much (if any) value.

a fair enough assesment of len views

I disagree, Mark. I do not consider a RADIOTELEGRAPHY TEST to be
any "operating skill" worthy of being part of an amateur radio
operator's license.

The FCC has had that viewpoint. They said so in public documents.

Stupor-patriot morsemen think morse code telegraphy skills are
all that is "operating skill."

wrote:
From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm


wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am

DIRECT as in laying on of hands,
moving controls, operating, all that stuff.

I get the feeling that your knowledge of radio operating might be a
little light. Are you of the opinion that operating a radio falls under
"all that stuff"?

Len does not consider "operating skills" to be of much (if any) value.

a fair enough assesment of len views

I disagree, Mark. I do not consider a RADIOTELEGRAPHY TEST to be
any "operating skill" worthy of being part of an amateur radio
operator's license.

my apologies I was trying to simply agee on paper with Jim as a
Retorical tactic I was also accepting the screwed up procode difer that
says Cw test was the same as operating skill (just tryin some
hypothecials to see if Jim could get past the nonsense or if Jim is as
traped as Stevie and Dave

The FCC has had that viewpoint. They said so in public documents.

Stupor-patriot morsemen think morse code telegraphy skills are
all that is "operating skill."

From: an old friend on Nov 28, 2:03 pm

wrote:
From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm
wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am


DIRECT as in laying on of hands,
moving controls, operating, all that stuff.

I get the feeling that your knowledge of radio operating might be a
little light. Are you of the opinion that operating a radio falls under
"all that stuff"?

Len does not consider "operating skills" to be of much (if any) value.

a fair enough assesment of len views

I disagree, Mark. I do not consider a RADIOTELEGRAPHY TEST to be
any "operating skill" worthy of being part of an amateur radio
operator's license.

my apologies I was trying to simply agee on paper with Jim as a
Retorical tactic I was also accepting the screwed up procode difer that
says Cw test was the same as operating skill (just tryin some
hypothecials to see if Jim could get past the nonsense or if Jim is as
traped as Stevie and Dave

I understand your posting, Mark. I was, once again, trying to
make my position clear in this din of inequity.

Jimmie Noserve and Kernal Klunk love to argue for argument's
sake. They seem to be addicted to WIN arguments at all costs!
They frequently take quotes out of context and make disparaging
remarks on those as if they were stand-alone statements.

They MUST win. They are very sore losers, can't take pain.

They both use "operating skills" as if the ONLY kind of operation
of radio involves morse code. In every other radio service, there
is NO "operating skill" of the amateur variety involved. Klunk
should know that but he is no longer in the furrin servuss, busy
using his "operating skills" out of exotic countries such as
Guinea-Bisseau. He probably misses BEING "rare DX."


The FCC has had that viewpoint. They said so in public documents.

As early as 1990, as in FCC 90-53. Anyone can see a copy of that
at the NCI website. They said the same thing, although in slightly
different works, in NPRM 05-143 released on 15 July 2005.


Stupor-patriot morsemen think morse code telegraphy skills are
all that is "operating skill."

That's how it is with them extra morsemen.

Failure to agree with them results in immediate dismissal under
BUPERINST something or other.

an old friend wrote:
wrote:
From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm


wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
wrote:
From: on Nov 26, 8:02 pm
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Mon 21 Nov 2005 09:41
wrote:
From: Dave Heil on Nov 20, 9:25 am
DIRECT as in laying on of hands,
moving controls, operating, all that stuff.
I get the feeling that your knowledge of radio operating might be a
little light. Are you of the opinion that operating a radio falls under
"all that stuff"?
Len does not consider "operating skills" to be of much (if any) value.
a fair enough assesment of len views
I disagree, Mark. I do not consider a RADIOTELEGRAPHY TEST to be
any "operating skill" worthy of being part of an amateur radio
operator's license.

my apologies I was trying to simply agee on paper with Jim...

Paper? Where's the paper?

...as a
Retorical tactic I was also accepting the screwed up procode difer that
says Cw test was the same as operating skill...

I beg to "difer" with your "Retorical" tactic, Colonel.

(just tryin some
hypothecials to see if Jim could get past the nonsense or if Jim is as
traped as Stevie and Dave

Only "hyptothecially" could you "trape" anybody.

Dave K8MN

Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm

cut
my apologies I was trying to simply agee on paper with Jim...

Paper? Where's the paper?

gog find it

...as a
Retorical tactic I was also accepting the screwed up procode difer that
says Cw test was the same as operating skill...

I beg to "difer" with your "Retorical" tactic, Colonel.

beg all you like I can't help

(just tryin some
hypothecials to see if Jim could get past the nonsense or if Jim is as
traped as Stevie and Dave

Only "hyptothecially" could you "trape" anybody.

did you have anything to say?

it doesn't look like it

Dave K8MN

an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm

cut
my apologies I was trying to simply agee on paper with Jim...

Paper? Where's the paper?

gog find it

Gog find it?

Isn't "Gog" that troll-like character in the comic strip
"B.C."...?!?!?

...as a
Retorical tactic I was also accepting the screwed up procode difer that
says Cw test was the same as operating skill...

I beg to "difer" with your "Retorical" tactic, Colonel.

beg all you like I can't help

There's so little you CAN help with, Markie.

(just tryin some
hypothecials to see if Jim could get past the nonsense or if Jim is as
traped as Stevie and Dave

Only "hyptothecially" could you "trape" anybody.

did you have anything to say?

it doesn't look like it

The point he was making, Blockhead, is that who can understand
YOUR point...?!?!

E N G L I S H ! ! ! !

S P E L L C H E C K E R ! ! ! !

H O O K E D O N P H O N I C S ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

On 3 Dec 2005 07:40:17 -0800, "K4YZ" wrote:


an_old_friend wrote:
Dave Heil wrote:
an old friend wrote:
wrote:
From: "an old friend" on Sun, Nov 27 2005 6:55 pm

cut
my apologies I was trying to simply agee on paper with Jim...

Paper? Where's the paper?

gog find it

Gog find it?

Isn't "Gog" that troll-like character in the comic strip
"B.C."...?!?!?

nope

...as a
Retorical tactic I was also accepting the screwed up procode difer that
says Cw test was the same as operating skill...

I beg to "difer" with your "Retorical" tactic, Colonel.

beg all you like I can't help

There's so little you CAN help with, Markie.

ltle or not it is more than you seem to manage

(just tryin some
hypothecials to see if Jim could get past the nonsense or if Jim is as
traped as Stevie and Dave

Only "hyptothecially" could you "trape" anybody.

did you have anything to say?

it doesn't look like it

The point he was making, Blockhead, is that who can understand
YOUR point...?!?!

I am not responaible for your lack of reading skill


E N G L I S H ! ! ! !

S P E L L C H E C K E R ! ! ! !

H O O K E D O N P H O N I C S ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

STEVEN J ROBESON
151 12TH AVE NW
WINCHESTER TN 37398
931-967-6282


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

K4YZ wrote:

E N G L I S H ! ! ! !

S P E L L C H E C K E R ! ! ! !

H O O K E D O N P H O N I C S ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

Get help.

On 3 Dec 2005 13:55:24 -0800, wrote:


K4YZ wrote:

E N G L I S H ! ! ! !

S P E L L C H E C K E R ! ! ! !

H O O K E D O N P H O N I C S ! ! ! !

Steve, K4YZ

Get help.

soon you need it bad
everyone should be advised that The following person
has been advocating the abuse of elders

he may also be making flase reports of abusing other in order to attak and cow his foes
he also shows signs of being dangerously unstable

STEVEN J ROBESON
151 12TH AVE NW
WINCHESTER TN 37398
931-967-6282


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 140,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account