Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
SMS wrote: Add an HD signal generator and an exciter that combines HD Radio and analog FM and then concentrate on the more difficult task of actual content, but as you stated hooking up with webcasters would be good model. John says it would cost "six figures" to add HD, and I wonder where that number came from. Is there some big up-front payment you have to make to iBiquity, because the equipment certainly doesn't cost anything close to $100K? There certainly is a fee to be paid to iBiquity, and it is based on the number of HD channels the station uses, plus a portion of the station's gross revenue. Adding IBOC to a station (and every station is different) amounts to a helluva lot more than "adding an HD signal generator". If that were all it was, I wouldn't even care about it. At lower powers, stations typically buy new transmitters. At higher power levels, IBOC transmitters are obtained, and combined at high level with the analog transmitters. In this process, 90% of the IBOC power is burned off as heat; 10% of the analog power is burned off. The bottom line is that thousands of watts are thrown away as heat, 24/7. Really green, eh? Sometimes, there isn't enough room and additional transmitter space must be rented to house the additional IBOC transmitter, the rack of gear, the combiner and the reject load. Sometimes, there is not enough power available in the building and the entire building's electrical system must me revamped. And...with HD, there comes considerable upgrades to the program-producing facilities, new digital STLs, and for HD-X, additional program control facilities. Yes, the current players put a PC jukebox in a closet and forget about it, but remember I work for a family that takes serving its listeners seriously. That is just scratching the surface. You have the potential to add listeners with different formats on HD (or not lose listeners when you change format by moving the old format to HD). I.e. I'd love an oldies station, but the Bay Area market can't support a regular FM oldies station the way other markets can, so if you want that content you have to subscribe to satellite radio at rather ridiculous prices. What good does it do to move the listeners to HD-X channels? No commercials = no revenue! All you have done is cannibalize your bread and butter source. Time for the broadcasters to realize that HD is here, and that fighting it is rather hopeless. Closing your eyes and pretending it doesn't exist, and hoping for a better digital radio standard to emerge is not productive. I have told the owners of my three stations that converting their three stations will come to about a half-million dollars (not counting iBiquity's cut), but including site modifications and equipment, STL replacements, and studio upgrades. Tell me...how do I sell that kind of capital investment with no clear ROI path in this economy? The last time we talked, they saw no downside to spending that money on program improvements instead. Now when will the SAP actually have some content on my TV? Another "solution" without a problem, do you think? -- John Higdon +1 408 ANdrews 6-4400 AT&T-Free At Last |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Higdon wrote:
There certainly is a fee to be paid to iBiquity, and it is based on the number of HD channels the station uses, plus a portion of the station's gross revenue. Well that doesn't sound fair if the fee is based on the revenue of the analog side of the station. heat; 10% of the analog power is burned off. The bottom line is that thousands of watts are thrown away as heat, 24/7. Really green, eh? How "green" it is is really a side issue. And...with HD, there comes considerable upgrades to the program-producing facilities, new digital STLs, and for HD-X, additional program control facilities. Yes, the current players put a PC jukebox in a closet and forget about it, but remember I work for a family that takes serving its listeners seriously. Yet there is some programming where the jukebox in a closet suits the listeners just fine, and it has nothing to do with treating listeners seriously or not. What good does it do to move the listeners to HD-X channels? No commercials = no revenue! All you have done is cannibalize your bread and butter source. No one ever said that you aren't allowed to sell advertising on the HD-X channels. Granted, until the installed base of HD receivers is much greater it will be a hard sell. I have told the owners of my three stations that converting their three stations will come to about a half-million dollars (not counting iBiquity's cut), but including site modifications and equipment, STL replacements, and studio upgrades. Tell me...how do I sell that kind of capital investment with no clear ROI path in this economy? The last time we talked, they saw no downside to spending that money on program improvements instead. It depends on how much of those costs are real. You don't necessarily need any studio upgrades if you're doing "jukebox in a closet." You've got to look at the long term and the big picture. At least ensure that new equipment that's purchased is "HD ready" so when HD reaches critical mass in a few years the time and money to bring it up will be minimal. Another "solution" without a problem, do you think? It could have worked if done properly. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/16/09 14:33 , SMS wrote:
John Higdon wrote: There certainly is a fee to be paid to iBiquity, and it is based on the number of HD channels the station uses, plus a portion of the station's gross revenue. Well that doesn't sound fair if the fee is based on the revenue of the analog side of the station. That's a time honored way of doing fees. BMI and ASCAP fees are based on a percentage of gross, and before divestiture, the Bell companies even based business phone rates on gross revenues. They went so far as to ask for gross and net revenues on the order form so rates can be calculated. Their thinking was that there is no business without a phone, so they deserve a cut. iBiquity is no different. The HD 1 stream is a simulcast of the analog channel, there is no HD audio without iBiquity, so they take a cut of revenues. heat; 10% of the analog power is burned off. The bottom line is that thousands of watts are thrown away as heat, 24/7. Really green, eh? How "green" it is is really a side issue. Not in today's business environment. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
SMS wrote: No one ever said that you aren't allowed to sell advertising on the HD-X channels. Granted, until the installed base of HD receivers is much greater it will be a hard sell. Once the commercials start, then it is just another commercial-laden ho-hum competitor in a sea of commercial programs. Most of the stations that are adopting IBOC are having one helluva time getting listeners on their main channel. Why will they do better attracting listeners to a grungy HD-X channel? And if they can, why don't they put that killer program on their main channel and make some real money? It depends on how much of those costs are real. You don't necessarily need any studio upgrades if you're doing "jukebox in a closet." You've got to look at the long term and the big picture. At least ensure that new equipment that's purchased is "HD ready" so when HD reaches critical mass in a few years the time and money to bring it up will be minimal. First, we don't do jukebox in a closet formats at our stations. That isn't what we do. We serve listeners. We do need to have real program-production facilities. Second, I don't personally believe that "long term" and iBiquity are compatible concepts. Third, going HD Radio means trashing audio quality both in the analog channel and in the multitude of HD-X channels. That's a "no sale" to us and at least a hard sell to most quality-conscious broadcasters. Fourth, the current crop of HD equipment is egregiously unreliable, and there is no expectation that the condition will improve in the foreseeable future. Don't take my word...ask any radio engineer who is responsible for a cluster of stations employing iBiquity's scheme. I personally know one engineer who got national attention for tossing all of the IBOC from his stations, AM and FM. [regarding SAP] It could have worked if done properly. Gee, I've never hear that before in my career! -- John Higdon +1 408 ANdrews 6-4400 AT&T-Free At Last |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
JUMP TEAM RADIO OPERATORS NEEDED | Policy | |||
Texas Balloon Launch Team (BLT) to fly ham radio and GPS this saturday 10a | Digital | |||
Texas Balloon Launch Team (BLT) to fly ham radio and GPS thiss... | Scanner | |||
Amateur Radio BPL Team to Stress Credibility | Shortwave |