On Oct 5, 6:42*pm, Beam Me Up Scotty Then-Destroy-
wrote:
On 10/5/2010 6:54 PM, RHF wrote:





On Oct 5, 11:24 am, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult
wrote:
In article ,
*Beam Me Up Scotty wrote:

On 10/3/2010 7:27 PM, dave wrote:
RHF wrote:

"CC",

All nice and good but Ignores the Fact
that it all Negates "Freedom of Religion".
* .
Once Again Let Me Repeat Myself :
Put a "Freedom of Religion" 'Clause' In Any
"Gay Marriage" Law and I Am For It [A-OK]
-however- Leave It Out and Force Churches to
Perform "Gay Marriage" and I Am Against It [.]

It's against the law for government to tell a church what to do.
I say the 1866 equal protection law applies, as well as the 14th amendment.

Amendment IX
- - The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not
be
- - construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

- One of the enumerated rights is the right
- to equal protection of the law.

=WRT= Equal Protection 'Under' The Law
-and- The Equality of All Human {Civil} Rights

[nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its
jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.]

NO one can marry direct DNA relations(Family) and NO body can marry
anyone but the opposite sex.....

Gays would have no physical reason to *NOT* marry family since they
can't produce retarded/weak DNA offspring. So when you allow the gays to
marry the Heterosexuals will then be able to complain that their civil
rights are being violated by stopping them from marrying their brother
or sister or son or daughter. Then using equal protection under the law
you would be forced to allow heterosexual family members like brother,
sister or father, daughter marriages also.

And that is one reason that Marriage is NOT what is needed for gays. You
have a death certificate for a reason and you don't use a death
certificate for someones birth, they are for different purposes, as
should Marriage NOT be used for both Heterosexual and Homosexual unions.
They are two very different applications of law and to use the same
document and rules and regulations will be a disservice to one or the
other and at some point would lead to violating the "equal protection
under the law" part of the constitution.

Do you always make it up as you go along?

On Oct 5, 8:29*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 10/5/2010 4:17 PM, Clave wrote:

...
Are you saying you know the Mind of God well enough to answer that question
yourself?

Jim

I know what I believe he would say ... yes. *Extrapolation of the books
leads to a logical conclusion ... God would not OK government having
anything to say of marriage ... it is his creation under his domain.
However, obfuscation the most obvious is the realm of cheats and liars ....

Regards,
JS

I would hesitate to try to count the number of times God changed His
mind in the Bible. The lack of consistency, even within chapters, can
be mind-boggling.

On 10/5/2010 9:57 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

...
I would hesitate to try to count the number of times God changed His
mind in the Bible. The lack of consistency, even within chapters, can
be mind-boggling.

I don't find that. However, I do find that the whole point of what God
is speaking on is missed by some ... like when the homosexuals demand
"equality" in marriage and "the tax breaks" and totally miss the whole
point of marriage ... it is why homosexual logic looks insane to
heterosexuals, a good portion of the time!

Regards,
JS

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
On 10/5/2010 9:57 PM, bpnjensen wrote:

...
I would hesitate to try to count the number of times God changed His
mind in the Bible. The lack of consistency, even within chapters, can
be mind-boggling.

I don't find that...

That's because you're a lying, bigoted, phony-ass "Pay-attention-to-
MEEEEEEEEE!!!!!" troll. You haven't read the Bible, and you aren't a
Christian.

Jim

On Oct 5, 9:51*am, BDK wrote:
In article ,
says...



On 10/5/2010 6:43 AM, Joe from Kokomo wrote:

...
Huh?

So, are you saying that all those heterosexual couples married in a
civil ceremony on the steps of City Hall aren't really married?

Remember the question, WWJD?

Well, just ask yourself, "Would God recognize such a marriage?"

Regards,
JS

- Wow, all this political and religious stuff makes me nostalgic for
the
- good old days, when people posted about....radios.
- --
- BDK, non-jew leader of the non-existant paid jew shills!

Figure that this one thread has saved a few Wives
from being Beaten and countless Dogs from getting
Kicked. a n d . . . a short wave good bye ~ RHF

On Oct 5, 9:53*am, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult
wrote:
In article ,
*John Smith wrote:

On 10/5/2010 9:06 AM, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult wrote:

...
Someone said you will know a seed by its fruit. Your fruit is hatred,
violence,
usurpation of the bible's god's justice, refusal to obey the bible's
saviour's
call for nonviolence, blasphemy, and heresy. So what is your seed and who
is
your god?

Oh, it is much worse that that. *I am absolutely arrogant in my belief
that it is the correct thinking ... and, if you really ask the above

CBOC -wrote-
"Jesus said to be nonviolent in response to violence
and never judge other people."

CBOC -wrote-
"Then you are not a christian."

Sounds like you-too are Judging 'other' People

Oops make that me-three oops oops ~ RHF


--
Damn the living - It's a lovely life. * * * * * I'm whoever you want me to be.
Silver silverware - Where is the love? * * * At least I can stay in character.
Oval swimming pool - Where is the love? * *Annoying Usenet one post at a time.
Damn the living - It's a lovely life. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *Blessed be.

On Oct 5, 8:45*pm, "Clave" wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message

...

On 10/5/2010 3:24 PM, Clave wrote:

...
...snip childish bigotry...

We already know that your opinion isn't based on reason. *You don't have
to
keep proving it.

Jim

- - I have never been liked by child molesters or homosexuals ...

- Oops -- you accidentally acknowledged that they aren't the same
thing.
-
- Jim

"CLAVE" {Jim} seting your reply to 'alt.stupidity'
is a real wimp-out . . .

Which Part of Man {Adult} & Boy {Child} Love NAMBLA
Do You Not Understand To Be Child Molestation ?
NAMBLA http://www.nambla.org/
-aka- Sick Gay Rights

Man {Adult Male} Using Boy {Child Male} = Homosexuals [.]
NAMBLA http://www.nambla.org/
-aka- Sick Homosexual 'Gay' Criminals : Not LGBT Rights

Man {Adult Male} Exploiting Boy {Child Male} = Child Abuse [.]
NAMBLA http://www.nambla.org/
-aka- Sick Homosexual 'Gay' Criminals : Not LGBT Rights

Man {Adult Male} Victimizing Boy {Child Male} = Child Molestation [.]
NAMBLA http://www.nambla.org/
-aka- Sick Homosexual 'Gay' Criminals : Not LGBT Rights

"RHF" wrote in message
...
On Oct 5, 8:45 pm, "Clave" wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message

...

On 10/5/2010 3:24 PM, Clave wrote:

...
...snip childish bigotry...

We already know that your opinion isn't based on reason. You don't
have
to
keep proving it.

Jim

- - I have never been liked by child molesters or homosexuals ...

- Oops -- you accidentally acknowledged that they aren't the same
thing.
-
- Jim

"CLAVE" {Jim} seting your reply to 'alt.stupidity'...

....is entirely appropriate for k00ks who've demonstrated that they're
beyond rational discussion.

Jim

On Oct 6, 12:14*am, "Clave" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

...



On Oct 5, 8:45 pm, "Clave" wrote:
"John Smith" wrote in message

...

On 10/5/2010 3:24 PM, Clave wrote:

...
...snip childish bigotry...

We already know that your opinion isn't based on reason. *You don't
have
to
keep proving it.

Jim

- - I have never been liked by child molesters or homosexuals ...

- Oops -- you accidentally acknowledged that they aren't the same
thing.
-
- Jim

- - "CLAVE" {Jim} seting your reply to 'alt.stupidity'...

CLAVE" {Jim},
Doing It Again is just a Foolish Double Wimp-Out
alt.stupidity,alt.you.belong.here.more.than.he.doe s

CLAVE" {Jim}, "you.belong.here.more.than.he.does"
you know yourself - oh too well ;;-}} ~ RHF

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 08:35:21 -0700, Project China Blue Book
wrote:

In article ,
duke wrote:

On Wed, 06 Oct 2010 05:33:03 -0800, dave wrote:

RHF wrote:
Tell it to Ratzinger!

Sorry, he's already put a stop to such a mortal sin.

After a millenia and a half, it's about time.

He's only been in charge 5 years.

The dukester, American-American
*****
"The Mass is the most perfect form of Prayer."
Pope Paul VI
*****