On 10/2/2010 12:22 PM, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult wrote:

...
I didn't know Whitman was the second coming of Jesus Christ.


Ohh, you missed the reverse implication, huh?

That's OK. The young and challenged often do ...

Regards,
JS

On 10/2/2010 12:23 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 10/2/2010 12:22 PM, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult wrote:

...
I didn't know Whitman was the second coming of Jesus Christ.


Ohh, you missed the reverse implication, huh?

That's OK. The young and challenged often do ...

Regards,
JS

So, let me be more pointed ... when stacking up meg alongside brown,
jerry appears to be your standard satanic queer ...

Regards,
JS

On 10/2/2010 12:41 PM, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult wrote:

...
You're not helping her: http://www.megwhitman.com/on_the_record.php
...

You are not paying attention ... I already said, the ballot is nothing
but a list of people you DON'T want in public office ... however, I,
personally, DO think meg is the lesser of two evils ... if the
difference is even worthwhile to consider is debatable ... but then, I
have implied that many, many times ...

Regards,
JS

On Oct 2, 12:41*pm, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult
wrote:
In article ,
*John Smith wrote:



On 10/2/2010 12:23 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 10/2/2010 12:22 PM, Chïna Blüe Öyster Cult wrote:

...
I didn't know Whitman was the second coming of Jesus Christ.

Ohh, you missed the reverse implication, huh?

That's OK. The young and challenged often do ...

Regards,
JS

So, let me be more pointed ... when stacking up meg alongside brown,
jerry appears to be your standard satanic queer ...

You're not helping her:http://www.megwhitman.com/on_the_record.php


The ISSUE Is "Freedom of Religion"
-and- The Separation of Church and State
-wrt- 'Civil Union' -versus- "Gay Marriage"

- MEG ON PROPOSITION 8
-
- ³I believe marriage should be a union between
- a man and a woman. I also strongly support
- California¹s civil union laws and believe all
- Californians should respect the legal rights
- of same sex couples.²
-
- Which agrees with Obama.
-
- Also:http://www.megwhitman.com/latinos.php

HELLO "Civil Union" Is Marriage before a State
Licensed Justice-of-the-Peace; Civil Judge, etc
and Does NOT place a Requirement for Churches
to Perform a LGBT Marriage -thus- Insuring the
Separation of Church-and-State.

Point-of-Fact : Prez Obama Wants so-called
"Gay Marriage" and Forcing Christian Churches
to Preform "Gay Marriages" -or- Loose Their
Federal Charitable Tax Status.

Prez Obama Does Not Respect The Separation
of Church-and-State : Prez Obama Wants the
Power of "The State" {US Federal Government
to Usurp the Freedom of the Churches.

YES Prez Obama Actively and Openiing Supports
so-called "Gay Marriage" and Forcing Christian
Churches to Perform "Gay Marriages"
-plus- Prez Obama Wants to Allowing LGBTs to
Sue Churches If the Church Will Not Preform
"Gay Marriage" : Trial Lawyers Love Prez Obama !

You Put In a "Freedom of Religion" 'Clause'
In Any "Gay Marriage" Law and I Am For It
-however- Leave It Out and Force Churches to
Perform "Gay Marriage" and I Am Against It [.]

Just Say NO to the Tyranny of LGBT 'Gay' Rights
TRUMPING All Other Civilian Rights of Non-LGBTs
including "Freedom of Religion" for All Persons
of Faith - can i get an 'amen' to that !?!

and that is the way that i see it ~ RHF

RHF wrote:
p

HELLO "Civil Union" Is Marriage before a State
Licensed Justice-of-the-Peace; Civil Judge, etc
and Does NOT place a Requirement for Churches
to Perform a LGBT Marriage -thus- Insuring the
Separation of Church-and-State.

Ahh, "separate but equal"; novel concept

The church has nothing to do with it. It is a contract between two
people and the state to operate the most elemental form of social unit,
a household.

On 10/2/2010 4:16 PM, dave wrote:

...
Ahh, "separate but equal"; novel concept

The church has nothing to do with it. It is a contract between two
people and the state to operate the most elemental form of social unit,
a household.

In the oldest recording of history, the book of Genesis, in the bible,
God gave marriage to man and woman--two queers simply cannot be married.
Marriage is a religious tradition which predates civilization,
government, tribes, villages, towns, cities, courts, mans' laws, etc.
Queers are denied marriage--God considers homosexual sex an abomination.

Queers demand separation of church and state, now is the time to deliver
it up to them--marriage is under the authority of God and his
representatives--the churches.

Governmnt must far overstep its' bounds to be able to say the smallest
thing about marriage. Such a government no one can, nor should, have
the smallest respect for ... and such is how it really is ... government
has now reduced itself, in respect, to the status queers hold in
heterosexual society.

You just can change the facts ...

Regards,
JS

On 10/2/2010 3:24 PM, John Smith wrote:

...
You just can change the facts ...

Regards,
JS

Can = can't, in the above ... but then, you should have already known
that ...

Regards,
JS

John Smith wrote:


Governmnt must far overstep its' bounds to be able to say the smallest
thing about marriage. Such a government no one can, nor should, have the
smallest respect for ... and such is how it really is ... government has
now reduced itself, in respect, to the status queers hold in
heterosexual society.


Religious rules have no standing in matters of government.

http://www.ancienttexts.org/library/...ian/gilgamesh/