On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 12, 3:19*pm, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova :









On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth
:

On Jun 10, 9:09*pm, John Smith wrote:
On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote:

...
You are way off topic. *When do you plan on fixing that?

Off topic?

Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd!

Don't even distract it from things of real concern!

ROFLOL!

Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong.

Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care?

[Crickets...]

So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of
anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and
clear.

The message you received is a product of your imagination.
Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of
the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite.
Language isn't your first language, is it?

And your refusal to provide the requested information, along
with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and
"ZNR", is indeed noted. Again.
--

Bob C.

"Evidence confirming an observation is
evidence that the observation is wrong."
- McNameless