Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"JEP" wrote in message om... And just who is ????? I have given a real email address and feel free to respond to it. The ARRL hasn't represented the membership directly---EVER! The ARRL has had it's own agenda (big money) for years. The ARRL would be considered a large corp. in most sectors, operating under a non-profit status. The only good about the ARRL is/was QST and now I can't even find it on the news stands. Bye bye ARRL. Bye bye ham radio as we know it. JEP It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com...
"JEP" wrote in message om... And just who is ????? I have given a real email address and feel free to respond to it. The ARRL hasn't represented the membership directly---EVER! The ARRL has had it's own agenda (big money) for years. The ARRL would be considered a large corp. in most sectors, operating under a non-profit status. The only good about the ARRL is/was QST and now I can't even find it on the news stands. Bye bye ARRL. Bye bye ham radio as we know it. JEP It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE DDF, Profits My Ass [.] - - - They can soon disappear through... = = = High Priced Management and Staff Salaries ? ? ? gc ~ RHF .. .. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Creative book keeping and Yankee lawyers keeps them out of trouble. Are they making a profit? Hell yes. No profit, No ARRL. Can they legally hide their profit? Well sure. With all of the books, CD's, DVD's, tapes and magazines they sell every year you know there is a profit. They are no different than GoodWill when it comes to making a profit except that Goodwill actually helps people. ARRL only helps itself! We will probably see QST being hawked in Publishers Clearing House before too long. Get a magazine and win a million |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
JEP wrote:
It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Creative book keeping and Yankee lawyers keeps them out of trouble. Hey! You forgot to call them liberals! Are they making a profit? Hell yes. No profit, No ARRL. Can they legally hide their profit? Well sure. With all of the books, CD's, DVD's, tapes and magazines they sell every year you know there is a profit. They are no different than GoodWill when it comes to making a profit except that Goodwill actually helps people. ARRL only helps itself! Lessee, just from their website, I've looked up exam dates and locations, Contest dates and rules, Hamfest dates and locations. I've downloaded project and info PDF's from them, looked up callsigns and matched names with callsigns. Looked through the swap section of the site, and been informed and sometimes entertained by the FCC enforcement news. Off the web, I've used their hints and kinks books, and I'd be lost without the Handbook. And those are just the superficial things, not counting the spectrum work and really critical stuff such as BPL. Yup, sure signs of an organization that only helps itself! Good luck with this one now! - Mike KB3EIA - |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"JEP" wrote in message om... It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Creative book keeping and Yankee lawyers keeps them out of trouble. Are they making a profit? Hell yes. No profit, No ARRL. Can they legally hide their profit? Well sure. With all of the books, CD's, DVD's, tapes and magazines they sell every year you know there is a profit. They are no different than GoodWill when it comes to making a profit except that Goodwill actually helps people. ARRL only helps itself! We will probably see QST being hawked in Publishers Clearing House before too long. Get a magazine and win a million If they are making a profit, then who is getting the money?? It's got to be going somewhere. There are no stockholders receiving dividends. It doesn't do any good just to sit on the money. And don't say salaries as that is fully documented in the financial records and is not profit. If you believe the salaries are too high, get on the board that makes the decisions and reduce them. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com...
It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Un-friggin-believable. Non-profits aren't about profit. They're about salaries. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Brian" wrote in message om... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com... It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Un-friggin-believable. Non-profits aren't about profit. They're about salaries. If the salaries are too high, get on the board and get them reduced. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com...
"Brian" wrote in message om... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com... It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Un-friggin-believable. Non-profits aren't about profit. They're about salaries. If the salaries are too high, get on the board and get them reduced. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Who said they were too high? They have to balance their books somehow (to avoid the appearance of profit), and the salary is the most convenient place to dump the excess. It's about your ignorance of what a non-profit really is. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Brian" wrote in message
om... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com... "Brian" wrote in message om... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message igy.com... It probably was no longer cost effective to sell it on newstands. If the ARRL is making money (a no-no for a non-profit corp) then report them to the IRS. If they are not making money, then no matter how big they are, it is not about money since no one is making a profit. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Un-friggin-believable. Non-profits aren't about profit. They're about salaries. If the salaries are too high, get on the board and get them reduced. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Who said they were too high? They have to balance their books somehow (to avoid the appearance of profit), and the salary is the most convenient place to dump the excess. It's about your ignorance of what a non-profit really is. Oh yeah...non-profit is the best place to be...And, the greates exploiter of human emotion, etc. With little effort, the dollars churn in--most people don't file for the donation they are entitled to (only large donations whose contributors are also playing the non-profit game). That's why I'd like to see the tax structure change to some kind of percentage across the board. The *only* entity that would not have to pay any would be a church--and that only for the church building, its parking lot, and its parish. If they've got a private school, nursing home, etc., they pay. And, no deductions for *anyone* or *anything* across the board. Colgate, Mr. Bates, and me all pay the same percentage of tax out of our income; that's it--end of game. Kim W5TIT Kim W5TIT |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
"Kim W5TIT" wrote:
(snip) The *only* entity that would not have to pay any would be a church-- and that only for the church building, its parking lot, and its parish. If they've got a private school, nursing home, etc., they pay. (snip) Why limit any exclusion to just the church building, parking lot, and parish? Since churches have been running schools, colleges, homeless shelters, women and youth shelters, food kitchens, youth camps and sports activities, hospitals, nursing homes, and so on, for many years (some long before this country was created and each requiring buildings, land, or equipment), such a limit would have a serious impact on many traditional church activities. The newsgroup "rec.radio.cb" deleted from this message. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL and the local scene | Policy | |||
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro Screwing NON ARRL members! | Policy | |||
ARRL Dilemmas (Representative KC8LDO a problem-operator) | CB | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | Shortwave |