Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
One finger hunt n peck typing system dude here.About two or three words
per minute,all depends on how long the words are and how often I scratch me arse and pick my nose,,, hold out your coffee cup and catch this booger,KLINK!!! Go bragg (Fort Bragg is Bragging every day) on your typing skills.Show us how fast you can type,BUT,that doesn't prove anything. cuhulin |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That old IBM computer that dates to back around 1990 is still sitting
over there at the Goodwill thrift store since a week ago.I know a guy who has worked with computers for 47 years and he knows every computer operating system there is.He told me that old IBM computer works on the old DOS (Disk Operating System) operating system and only old timers know how to program and work that computer.I believe him too.This afternoon,I offered the lady at the checkout counter $5.00 for that computer.I really don't need or want that old computer,but I want it any damn way! cuhulin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
With arthritis in my fingers,how fast (Johnny ****erfast!!! come home to
supper! Gee whiz mom,I am ****ing her fast as I can!) do y'all expect me to type? Just wait till arthritis catches up to you,and you can be sure it will too. cuhulin |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "running dogg" wrote /snip Hobby broadcasting would reinvigorate the hobby, but the oldtimers refuse to consider it. I agree with that. But the FCC has approved low-power FM broadcast licenses, they just haven't got their heads out of someplace to make it easy enough that it takes hold. And there is no conceivable reason that every neighborhood couldn't have a dozen such stations if they wanted them. There are almost as many groups advocating the free right to such low power broadcast (without any kind of license at all) as there are those that espouse income taxes to be unconstitutional. Hopefully the FM broadcast groups actually have a chance of persuading legislators - we know taxes will never go away, lol. Jack Painter Virginia Beach, Virginia |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "running dogg" barked and slobbered in message ... SNIP SNIP Hams no longer provide essential communications in an emergency, not with all the other methods of communicating. SNIP I direct you to the following URL's http://www.arrl.org/w1aw/2002-arlb012.html http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2003/10/29/102/?nc=1 http://mrtmag.com/news/sept2002/radi...teurs_nonstop/ http://www.arrl.org/arrlletter/03/0801/ See San Diego Tribune article Dozens more on request - or use google if you know how. You Sir, simply don't know what you are talking about. The 500+ Amateurs who participated in these disasters would agree with me as well as the civil authorities and the public who benefited from the Amateur Radio communications when the silly phones were overloaded and the phone lines were toast. -- Lamont Cranston |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yankee Can Do! Us Yankees are Hunting down and Killing the terrorist
ragheads who want to kill us every day! We! Are! Doing! cuhulin |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... The ham radio hobby really needs to rethink the way that it controls access to the hobby. Continuing to require seriously outdated tests like morse code is a turnoff to many potential amateur radio buffs. Why not try something revolutionary such as live testing for safe and courteous operation using voice and digital modes. When I listen to the guys on HF my sense is that their average age continues to increase. I also detect that overall participation is way off from a decade ago - lots of open space in what were once crowded chunks of spectrum. I hear very few young and virtually no female voices of any age. Ham radio needs to think of changes to become a worthwhile alternative to the many other modes of communicating that do not require a license. If it continues doing business as it has then it's future will indeed be short - possibly much less than 2050 as mentioned in the earlier thread. The remaining members can look forward to the FCC continuing to divert more amateur radio spectrum to commercial interests that want to use it. Hard to say. There is a significant difference between a radio amateur and a radio user. A radio amateur implies a degree of sophistication that you don't get from a regular old radio user. Remember CB?? The people who would have found CB trendy would find cellphones trendy. Simply turning on a 2M handheld and talking into it doesn't make one a radio amateur; you need to understand what it is you're doing. I, for example, don't qualify as a radio amateur because I know how to use a cell or the internet. I'd need to study radio theory and understand what it is that I'm doing. Does that mean I'm for code?? No, I really don't care about that very much, because there are enough friends that I have who are content to be Techs without code. Do the Feds have the right to take away the spectrum? Sure; but the spectrum that's getting the most noise (outside of BPL, of course) is the real high end stuff in the GHz range, far beyond 2M and the other bands most of us think of as the Ham bands. Could hams become irrelevant in the future?? Sure they could if everyone uses cells, but in the end things like music and movie industry reps wanting payment for their copyrighted material will probably influence the direction that satellite, internet radio and regular radio will go more than the hams. A local radio station ended up having to sell it's regular broadcast station because they got way into debt providing money to the recording industry for their internet broadcasts, which the recording industry wanted top dollar for, not the discount that they give the broadcast radio stations. If the recording industry does that to satellite and internet streamers, it'll kill off most of them pretty darn quick, and the "need" to take the hams' frequencies will evaporate. By way of background I come from a family of radio amateurs. My son (an electrical engineer) considered the hobby, but thought the licensing requirement silly and the morse code requirement laughable in todays world. He can talk around the world several ways via the internet. He has a cell phone that does much the same thing a handheld tribander does - allows him to talk with other people. It looks a lot like a handheld, but it costs less and doesn't require a license. The cell may cost less initially, but to use it you keep pumping money to the provider company. Get a secondhand 2M, and the cell company's fees will eclipse it in a year or two. Of course, if you want to do other things with your cell phone, like do pictures, that'll cost you extra. Time for the hobby and it's gatekeeper to wake up before it is too late. Ric Trexell wrote: I was reading a few of the posts about how there will not be a need for ham radio in the future due to all the new ways of communicating. Tha t has a lot to do with it but I think the biggest problem with ham radio is the hams themselves. CB'ers killed CB'ing with bad language and hams are doing it with those stupid contests. I remember as a kid getting my first SW radio and listening to hams talk about their lives and the area that they lived in and stuff like that. Now when I turn it on I get guys talking only about their radio or calling CQ CQ contest. Then another will come back and say they are 5 and 9 out here in Kansas and soon the guy is calling CQ CQ contest again. Does any one think that people are going to invest in a radio and all the learning to do what are nothing more than fancy radio checks? If that is what the ham bands are going to be used for, then I say turn them over to business and telephone radio freqs. Ric. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 02/03/2005 9:30 PM, Ric Trexell wrote:
I was reading a few of the posts about how there will not be a need for ham radio in the future due to all the new ways of communicating. That has a lot to do with it but I think the biggest problem with ham radio is the hams themselves. CB'ers killed CB'ing with bad language and hams are doing it with those stupid contests. I remember as a kid getting my first SW radio and listening to hams talk about their lives and the area that they lived in and stuff like that. Now when I turn it on I get guys talking only about their radio or calling CQ CQ contest. Then another will come back and say they are 5 and 9 out here in Kansas and soon the guy is calling CQ CQ contest again. Does any one think that people are going to invest in a radio and all the learning to do what are nothing more than fancy radio checks? If that is what the ham bands are going to be used for, then I say turn them over to business and telephone radio freqs. Ric. Your comments are certainly going to spawn a lot of commentary! I hope the vitriol stays reasonably low, as I can see where you are coming from. In my short experience, rag-chewers talk about a.) the weather b.) their equipment and c.) their cats. I wanted to get into amateur radio when I was a kid -- it was exactly the kind of technology I was fascinated by -- but for various reasons never really got beyond building my own VHF "scanner" and learning how to solder. All these years later, the purchase of a SW set has rekindled my interest in amateur. I've recently decided to get my Basic Qualification just for fun. However, I've noticed many of the same things you have, and I /have/ wondered if the glory days are over, and I'm just too late. I think there is no surprise that the mean age of amateurs has only gone up. With the rise of internet radio, and the scaling down of some of the stations, much the same good be said for SWL, as well. I decided to go for it anyway, and to even practice Morse (I'm learning at 15 WPM just to set a challenge.) I figure I can give myself a few years on the +30MHz areas until I get my code endorsement (or the ITU recommends dropping code, and Industry Canada follows suit), participating as I can. I think contests might be a fun way to meet people outside of your local "net", but agree that unless you promise to hook up at a later time, the pressure is really just to work 'em and log 'em and move on. I'm going to a ham swap meet in the summer to scope out my local amateur community. As someone else said in this thread, amateur cab be about more than talking about gear and the weather on SSB. What the hell. I'll discover that for myself. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1415 Â September 24, 2004 | CB | |||
209 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (04-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
193 English-language HF Broadcasts audible in NE US (01-APR-04) | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | CB | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Policy |