Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#91
|
|||
|
|||
"Volker Tonn" wrote in message ... Lucky schrieb: ...The only problem I have is the audio of course. Even thru great speakers, it can sound muddy and flat. Not good fidelity even with a very wide filter. ...as a NRD-user you *should* know: Run the audio from the LINE-out through a decent audio-amp or an good active speaker with seperate tone controls. Line-out level is set by a pot accessible on the bottom side of the 525. I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Lucky |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Lucky schrieb: I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Have try to connect the line out with your stereo amp and you will be impressed. :-) |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
"Volker Tonn" wrote in message ... Lucky schrieb: I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Have try to connect the line out with your stereo amp and you will be impressed. :-) Good morning Ok thanks a bunch Volker. Next time I set up my 525 I'm going to try it. I do like that receiver but that audio has kept me from using it more. Lucky |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
"Volker Tonn" wrote in message ... Lucky schrieb: I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Have try to connect the line out with your stereo amp and you will be impressed. :-) Good morning Ok thanks a bunch Volker. Next time I set up my 525 I'm going to try it. I do like that receiver but that audio has kept me from using it more. Lucky |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg" wrote in message ... From: David Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:23:06 GMT Subject: R-75 status? On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:39:00 -0400, "Lucky" wrote: Yeah, I love the way the solid feel of the NRD-525 controls. It's a well built receiver and it pulls signals out very nicely. The only problem I have is the audio of course. Even thru great speakers, it can sound muddy and flat. Not good fidelity even with a very wide filter. Other then that I like my 525 a lot but use the R75 most of the time. Lucky LMAO. A great radio except it sounds bad. Other than that, it's a fine paperweight. The big knobs impress the chicks. David, My 525 is a great radio. The sometimes poor audio (depending upon what I'm listening to) is not a big issue for me, besides, there are remedies for that. Overall, IMHO, it's a great radio. Dumbass. Greg I agree Greg dumbass......... Lucky |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
"Volker Tonn" wrote in message ... Lucky schrieb: I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Have try to connect the line out with your stereo amp and you will be impressed. :-) I don't suppose that is a nice way to avoid the sound issues with the IC-R71A?? --Mike L. |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Lawson wrote:
"Volker Tonn" wrote in message ... Lucky schrieb: I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Have try to connect the line out with your stereo amp and you will be impressed. :-) I don't suppose that is a nice way to avoid the sound issues with the IC-R71A?? --Mike L. Much of the distortion with R71, which can approach 20%, are related to the four mixers. Sometimes a good sound system at the REC out can make an improvement, depending on speaker selection, but often, what a higher definition audio system does, is merely enhance the audibility of the distortion that's otherwise masked by the 'smearing' of the waveform created by the use of ceramic capacitors in the audio path. KIWA offers a nice mod for the audio of R71. And it's reasonably priced. And it DOES clean up the audio path. But the cleaner audio path only served, in the three units I've heard that were so modified, to call attention to distortions that were generated in pre-audio stages. There, currently are no mods to attenuate those distortions. |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Michael Lawson wrote:
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Michael Lawson wrote: "Volker Tonn" wrote in message ... Lucky schrieb: I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Have try to connect the line out with your stereo amp and you will be impressed. :-) I don't suppose that is a nice way to avoid the sound issues with the IC-R71A?? --Mike L. Much of the distortion with R71, which can approach 20%, are related to the four mixers. Sometimes a good sound system at the REC out can make an improvement, depending on speaker selection, but often, what a higher definition audio system does, is merely enhance the audibility of the distortion that's otherwise masked by the 'smearing' of the waveform created by the use of ceramic capacitors in the audio path. KIWA offers a nice mod for the audio of R71. And it's reasonably priced. And it DOES clean up the audio path. But the cleaner audio path only served, in the three units I've heard that were so modified, to call attention to distortions that were generated in pre-audio stages. There, currently are no mods to attenuate those distortions. How bad is the sound on the R71A, really?? I've had an R70 in the past, and I didn't think it was that bad there, but fidelity wise a Drake or the Sat 800 is better. If it's in the realm of the R70 as far as how bad the sound is, it's livable. I know people who listened to R71 for MWBC all day every day. I was one of them, and I wasn't alone. Unless you're focussing on the audio, it's very likely you'll never notice it. Example, I never really paid attention to the clipping on WLS until I migrated from R71, to Sat 650. The cleaner audio path made the clipping distortion (over processing at the transmitter) noticeable, and on the higher fidelity audio path, irritating. Compared to WGN, it was a night and day difference. When I migrated to Fanfare FTA-100, the difference was greater still. With R71, WGN or WLS...it was AM radio. And there were few apparent differences between the audio of the two. If you didn't have a problem with R70, you won't have a problem with R71. --Mike L. |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Michael Lawson wrote: "Volker Tonn" wrote in message ... Lucky schrieb: I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Have try to connect the line out with your stereo amp and you will be impressed. :-) I don't suppose that is a nice way to avoid the sound issues with the IC-R71A?? --Mike L. Much of the distortion with R71, which can approach 20%, are related to the four mixers. Sometimes a good sound system at the REC out can make an improvement, depending on speaker selection, but often, what a higher definition audio system does, is merely enhance the audibility of the distortion that's otherwise masked by the 'smearing' of the waveform created by the use of ceramic capacitors in the audio path. KIWA offers a nice mod for the audio of R71. And it's reasonably priced. And it DOES clean up the audio path. But the cleaner audio path only served, in the three units I've heard that were so modified, to call attention to distortions that were generated in pre-audio stages. There, currently are no mods to attenuate those distortions. How bad is the sound on the R71A, really?? I've had an R70 in the past, and I didn't think it was that bad there, but fidelity wise a Drake or the Sat 800 is better. If it's in the realm of the R70 as far as how bad the sound is, it's livable. --Mike L. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
"D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Michael Lawson wrote: "D Peter Maus" wrote in message ... Michael Lawson wrote: "Volker Tonn" wrote in message ... Lucky schrieb: I'm running the audio thru good speakers only 4 or 5 watts but not thru the Line-Out. I must confess I didn't know about that or forgot. Forgot might be more probable I haven't used my 525 in months now. I was switching between the HF-150 and R75 but lately the R75 and HF3. Have try to connect the line out with your stereo amp and you will be impressed. :-) I don't suppose that is a nice way to avoid the sound issues with the IC-R71A?? --Mike L. Much of the distortion with R71, which can approach 20%, are related to the four mixers. Sometimes a good sound system at the REC out can make an improvement, depending on speaker selection, but often, what a higher definition audio system does, is merely enhance the audibility of the distortion that's otherwise masked by the 'smearing' of the waveform created by the use of ceramic capacitors in the audio path. KIWA offers a nice mod for the audio of R71. And it's reasonably priced. And it DOES clean up the audio path. But the cleaner audio path only served, in the three units I've heard that were so modified, to call attention to distortions that were generated in pre-audio stages. There, currently are no mods to attenuate those distortions. How bad is the sound on the R71A, really?? I've had an R70 in the past, and I didn't think it was that bad there, but fidelity wise a Drake or the Sat 800 is better. If it's in the realm of the R70 as far as how bad the sound is, it's livable. I know people who listened to R71 for MWBC all day every day. I was one of them, and I wasn't alone. Unless you're focussing on the audio, it's very likely you'll never notice it. Example, I never really paid attention to the clipping on WLS until I migrated from R71, to Sat 650. The cleaner audio path made the clipping distortion (over processing at the transmitter) noticeable, and on the higher fidelity audio path, irritating. Compared to WGN, it was a night and day difference. When I migrated to Fanfare FTA-100, the difference was greater still. With R71, WGN or WLS...it was AM radio. And there were few apparent differences between the audio of the two. If you didn't have a problem with R70, you won't have a problem with R71. Hmm. I guess then I can live with it. Maybe next year (or the year after) I'll try to obtain one of them (or the R-5000) via eBay. Methinks that the R8B will have to wait a while until the used prices return to normal. --Mike L. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PETE [KE9OA] 'status report' on the AM/MW Receiver Project | Shortwave | |||
RHF Displays His Card-Carrying Member Status in the Rat-Fink Society | Shortwave | |||
GCN Status? | Shortwave | |||
Restoring the status quo of Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
Status of Shortwave. | Shortwave |