Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#81
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lucky schrieb:
...The only problem I have is the audio of course. Even thru great speakers, it can sound muddy and flat. Not good fidelity even with a very wide filter. ....as a NRD-user you *should* know: Run the audio from the LINE-out through a decent audio-amp or an good active speaker with seperate tone controls. Line-out level is set by a pot accessible on the bottom side of the 525. |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only way you will ever get good fidelity is with a woman.
cuhulin |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only way you will never get fidelity is with cuhulin.
|
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Brian Denley" wrote in message ... Michael wrote: The point I was trying to make is that using minimal differences in stats is not a good way to demonstrate which is the superior raido. There are statistics and then there are statistics. Michael Michael: BTW, I agree with you that the R-75 is a pretty damn good buy for the money. The only place we don't agree is that it's SSB perfomance is somehow better than the kilobuck receivers. They have all the ECSS tools too. The real shame is that all these manufacturers apparently don't think SWL has a future and have dropped out. -- Hiya The IC-R75 doesn't have any real "statistical" advantages over the radios that we have been comparing it to. I prefer it for ECSS/Utility/DX'ing/HAM over the R8 series primarily due to the twin pbt. It is not a "miracle" feature, but I find I can use it to make any signal that is strong enough to hear good enough to listen to. The 1 hz synthesizer is also handy as are the multiple steps of amplification. And... It cost less too :-) One of my friends has an R8, R8a and he recently purchased an R8b. He also has a mint condition Kenwood R-5000. He has also used my R75 for several weeks when we did receiver swaps. Given the IC-R75 twin pbt and the vaunted R8b ssb selectable AM sync, his favorite radio to use is the R-5000. He just likes it. So, I'm sure the larger part of what radio is the better radio can be determined by the most important feature of any radio. The user. I'm also disappointed that there are fewer and fewer tabletop models being produced. I dont think manufacturers feel that sw listenership is on the way out, though. I'm sure they realize that sw is still a widely used and practical medium for broadcasters to reach the third world. For the most part, listeners in third world countries tune in to get news and information. They aren't into it for any "hobby" appeal. They just want the info that they couldn't get otherwise. It would go to reason that third world listeners wouldn't be in the market for rigs like the R8b, IC-R75 or NRD-545. They would be well served with a capable and economical portable like the ones being churned out in China by Degen. As far as most of the western/modern world is concerned, with internet and satellite communications widely available, sw listening for content is a second string medium. It is less reliable and it is always of a lesser quality as far as the clarity of the transmission. It is true, however unlikely that the internet could go down and satellite com could be interrupted for any one of a number of reasons. If that does occur, you can count on it coming back up in a fairly short time. Not to mention, solar occurrences that are intense enough to wipe out satellite communications would also wipe out hf propagation. So, for getting information of all kinds, you dont have to worry about needing a pricy tabletop sw rig. It isn't 1920-1980 any longer. For the most part, the only ones left in the western/modern world who want an expensive sw tabletop rigs are hobbyists like us. So, I can see why fewer and fewer manufacturers are sticking with making tabletop sw radios. Michael |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:39:00 -0400, "Lucky"
wrote: Yeah, I love the way the solid feel of the NRD-525 controls. It's a well built receiver and it pulls signals out very nicely. The only problem I have is the audio of course. Even thru great speakers, it can sound muddy and flat. Not good fidelity even with a very wide filter. Other then that I like my 525 a lot but use the R75 most of the time. Lucky LMAO. A great radio except it sounds bad. Other than that, it's a fine paperweight. The big knobs impress the chicks. |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David wrote: On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:39:00 -0400, "Lucky" wrote: Yeah, I love the way the solid feel of the NRD-525 controls. It's a well built receiver and it pulls signals out very nicely. The only problem I have is the audio of course. Even thru great speakers, it can sound muddy and flat. Not good fidelity even with a very wide filter. Other then that I like my 525 a lot but use the R75 most of the time. Lucky LMAO. A great radio except it sounds bad. Other than that, it's a fine paperweight. The big knobs impress the chicks. That could indeed be true as most everyone comments on the bad audio which seems to always be overcome by the tuning knob. They DO have a nice feel to them. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 13:39:36 -0400, dxAce
wrote: David wrote: On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:39:00 -0400, "Lucky" wrote: Yeah, I love the way the solid feel of the NRD-525 controls. It's a well built receiver and it pulls signals out very nicely. The only problem I have is the audio of course. Even thru great speakers, it can sound muddy and flat. Not good fidelity even with a very wide filter. Other then that I like my 525 a lot but use the R75 most of the time. Lucky LMAO. A great radio except it sounds bad. Other than that, it's a fine paperweight. The big knobs impress the chicks. That could indeed be true as most everyone comments on the bad audio which seems to always be overcome by the tuning knob. They DO have a nice feel to them. dxAce Michigan USA http://www.iserv.net/~n8kdv/dxpage.htm So stick icepicks in your ears and just fondle? |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dr.Strangelove movie is winding up on tv.Sic em,Slim.Yeeeeeee
Hawwwwww,,,,,,, Yeeeeeee Hawwwwww,,,,,,,,, cuhulin |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... Dr.Strangelove movie is winding up on tv.Sic em,Slim.Yeeeeeee Hawwwwww,,,,,,, Yeeeeeee Hawwwwww,,,,,,,,, cuhulin ------------------------------------------------------------------------ I love that movie,,, just got done watching it. J |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() From: David Organization: EarthLink Inc. -- http://www.EarthLink.net Newsgroups: rec.radio.shortwave Date: Sat, 16 Jul 2005 17:23:06 GMT Subject: R-75 status? On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 11:39:00 -0400, "Lucky" wrote: Yeah, I love the way the solid feel of the NRD-525 controls. It's a well built receiver and it pulls signals out very nicely. The only problem I have is the audio of course. Even thru great speakers, it can sound muddy and flat. Not good fidelity even with a very wide filter. Other then that I like my 525 a lot but use the R75 most of the time. Lucky LMAO. A great radio except it sounds bad. Other than that, it's a fine paperweight. The big knobs impress the chicks. David, My 525 is a great radio. The sometimes poor audio (depending upon what I'm listening to) is not a big issue for me, besides, there are remedies for that. Overall, IMHO, it's a great radio. Dumbass. Greg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PETE [KE9OA] 'status report' on the AM/MW Receiver Project | Shortwave | |||
RHF Displays His Card-Carrying Member Status in the Rat-Fink Society | Shortwave | |||
GCN Status? | Shortwave | |||
Restoring the status quo of Ham Radio | Homebrew | |||
Status of Shortwave. | Shortwave |