Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Sangean ATS-909 vs. Sony ICF-7600GR
Hello.
I would strongly suggest buying the Sony ICF-SW7600GR along with a Sony AN-LP1 antenna as quickly as possible. The AN-LP1 has been discontinued in North America, but several dealers, including AES and Universal, still have some - for how much longer no one knows. The Sony radio, in addition to having a synchronous detection circuit which really enhances MW and SW reception, is built to a very high construction standard for a portable. (My oldest sample is almost eight years old.) The Sangean does not have this detection circuit which, in my opinion, is one of the most significant enhancements to AM reception since single sideband. I have personally owned two Sangean radios - the ATA-808A and the ATS-606AP (both made in Taiwan as is the ATS-909) - both of which "died" after rather short lives. In my opinion, Sangean radios are not constructed with a great deal of integrity. The Sangean ATS-909 has more "features" (though none of really great importance) than the Sony, but, frankly, having been "burned" twice, I would not buy or recommend one. I have never had even a single problem with ANY of my Sony portables (two ICF-SW35s, two ICF-SW7600Gs, and five ICF-SW7600GRs, as well as five AN-LP1 antennas). If you are interested in the Sony SW radio line, I suggest you act very soon. Best, Joe |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Sangean ATS-909 vs. Sony ICF-7600GR
Hello,
Joe Analssandrini adviced to buy Sony because of its quality and sync detector and also because of bad experiences with Sangean radios. I agree Joe that the Sony has the sync detector. If I had to buy a new radio today, I possibly go for that one, or a Super 909. I "only" own a regular 909 bought in early 2002. It is now 4 years old and so far ... I'm lucky with it! Reception is ok off the whip for me, but perhaps I should try another radio (this is my first and only one) before giving a final note. With an external antenna it gives very good results. I've tried so far : - ANT-60 reel antenna (23 ft wire) - home made coax loop (cut for 5 Mhz) - home-made random dipole - Kaito KA31 active antenna (same as Degen DE31) The two last give the best results (I have to study the dipole a bit more, I suspect it gives better results than the Kaito antenna...). In fact for me the choice will be : Sony sync detector vs Sangean memories and RDS (I'm in Europe and RDS is widely used here) It is realy a matter of personnal choice. Else there is also Degen/Kaito 1103 and 1102 radios that are said to be good for a much cheaper price. But this is another story. Both the Sony and Sangean are good in my humble opinion... The fun of this hobby begins with the radio, but then continues with antennas, a infinite field of study and experiments :-D But saying so will not help much NGU to decide perhaps... :-) Charly |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Sangean ATS-909 vs. Sony ICF-7600GR
I second what Joe Analssandrini says.About nine years ago,I bought a
Sangean ATS-909 radio from ccrane.I tried it out for a week and I packed it up and I sent it back.I just didn't like that radio.A few months ago,I bought a Sony 7600GR radio from www.jr.com I am very pleased with my Sony 7600GR radio.For a new portable radio,it is hard to beat.By the way,I have read a few reports before that some of those Sangean radios,the front digital readout panels on them start going buggy after a while and ccrane charges about fifty dollars (plus shipping and handling charges) to repair those radios.Once Bitten,Twice Shy,an old saying goes. cuhulin |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Sangean ATS-909 vs. Sony ICF-7600GR
Joe Analssandrini wrote: I have personally owned two Sangean radios - the ATA-808A and the ATS-606AP (both made in Taiwan as is the ATS-909) - both of which "died" after rather short lives. In my opinion, Sangean radios are not constructed with a great deal of integrity. I've used the 606A as a knock-about radio for about 5 years now. It has held up pretty well, by and large. Only once did I have a problem - when the LCD temporarily went out (for about 2 days) during a monsoon season in the Western Ghats. I guess that was attributable to the excessive moisture in the air. I will agree with you, though, that Sony radios seem to be built to a higher standard, although I don't know why they couldn't put a half-way decent FM section in the 'SW77. junius |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
'portable' AM/FM Shortwave Radio Question : Sony ICF-2010 / Sony ICF-SW7600GR / Eton E1 with XM Satellite Radio | Shortwave | |||
Sangean PT-80, Sony will stop making SW radios ... | Shortwave | |||
Sony ICF-SW7600 / Sony ICF-SW7600G / Sony ICF-SW7600GR AM/FM Shortwave Radio Information & Links | Shortwave | |||
Sony 7600GR Cell Phones and Amish | Shortwave |