N3CVJ wrote:
At this point, it's best to just leave it go.

Agreed,,the Phelps issue is haunting you almost as bad as your
self-professed skills and knowledge regarding your status as an extra
that a roger beep is illegal and going over 70 MPH makes one a federal
criminal.

Guys like Landshark, understand what the

topic is and will understand a good

explanation.



That's almost as rich as what follows, as Shark and I said the exact
same thing concerning DX. You arr suffering a great deal on this
aubject.

N3CVJ, in all his self-projecting glory wrote:
Twist, on the other hand, gets

hung up on certain overly literal semantics,


Now that is rich, especially in light of the fact that your posting
history is littered with expressed difficulties getting hung up over
semantics.....

N3CVJ wrote:
What do you consider a good price?

What do you consider a great price?

What do you consider lightning protection?

What do consider a bad swr?

What do you consider legal power?

Just what do you consider tolerance?

What do you consider injury?

What do you consider a channel?

What do you consider work?

What do you consider proper drive?

What do you consider old?

What do you consider a fact?

What do you consider nice?

What do you consider a positive contribution?


Man,,I looove Fridays! Have a great weekend, davie, and try not to
permit me to lord over your thoughts and actions in my absence...unless,
of course, it's to take more of my scholarly posts and have them
interpreted to you by one of these educated colleagues of which you
speak.

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 11:47:49 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote:

N3CVJ wrote:
At this point, it's best to just leave it go.

Agreed,,the Phelps issue is haunting you almost as bad as your
self-professed skills and knowledge regarding your status as an extra
that a roger beep is illegal and going over 70 MPH makes one a federal
criminal.

You brain is short-circuiting again. You're starting to babble....


Guys like Landshark, understand what the
topic is and will understand a good
explanation.

That's almost as rich as what follows, as Shark and I said the exact
same thing concerning DX. You arr suffering a great deal on this
aubject.

No, not exactly. But at least when the proper context was explained.
Lanshark acknowledged such. While you continue to defend and twist
words.


Dave
"Sandbagger"

N3cvj wrote:
That's almost as rich as what follows, as Shark and I said the exact
same thing concerning DX. You are suffering a great deal on this
aubject.

No, not exactwy.



So post the part you incorrectly claim claims anything other than "skip
affects dx", but please don't strain yourself again, as you get quite
testy and agitated when asked to provide things only you see and hear
and can't comprehend correctly..

But at least when the proper context was

explained. Lanshark acknowledged such.

While you continue to defend and twist words.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

DX affects splatter and signals, cut and dry, and you've been skinned by
several here showing your original statement "dx does not affect
splatter" is wrong, so much in fact, you rushed to qualify just what
"you" meant by such a statement, when everyone else knew exactly what
the statement meant. This holds perfectly with your long-demonstrated
pattern of you asking everyone else what they "meant" by the very simple
terms used. Again, only you have expressed great difficulty in not only
comprehending what others say, but in conveying and expressing your
feelings and position adequately. Such leads to your almost daily
inquiry of everyone you ever debate: "What did you mean by "......."?
Your deficit in communications is growing leaps and bounds with your
balding head.