Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
O
Seeing how you brought up the bending of the antenna.......... Another disadvantage of the 102" ss whip is the gain lost because of this bending. It is significant. Where are your test results showing a "significant" loss of gain with a wind-bent antenna? Don't even need a test on this one. 1. It can be mathematically calculated. ( I'll let you do that) 2. It looses gain bad enough that you can actually see it and hear it. Example : Two vehicles are traveling together down the expressway at 75mph. One uses a K-40. The other a 102" whip. Both appear to have similar maximum S-meter readings but the 102 " whips signal fades in and out The K-40 does some fading but not nearly as deep as the 102". |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Don't even need a test on this one. 2. It looses gain bad enough that you can actually see it and hear it. Example : Two vehicles are traveling together down the expressway at 75mph. One uses a K-40. The other a 102" whip. Both appear to have similar maximum S-meter readings but the 102 " whips signal fades in and out The K-40 does some fading but not nearly as deep as the 102". "All we need are the facts. Just the facts. Go get the facts. Run the test and stop posturing." But I think this one is closer to the truth: "You are not going to get a definitive answer from me, just conjecture." I'll repeat. No test is necessary in my mind. I have seen the above scenario more than once. If you don't believe it then you test it. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:27:19 -0500, wrote in
: Don't even need a test on this one. 2. It looses gain bad enough that you can actually see it and hear it. Example : Two vehicles are traveling together down the expressway at 75mph. One uses a K-40. The other a 102" whip. Both appear to have similar maximum S-meter readings but the 102 " whips signal fades in and out The K-40 does some fading but not nearly as deep as the 102". "All we need are the facts. Just the facts. Go get the facts. Run the test and stop posturing." But I think this one is closer to the truth: "You are not going to get a definitive answer from me, just conjecture." I'll repeat. No test is necessary in my mind. I have seen the above scenario more than once. If you don't believe it then you test it. In your mind is exactly where -all- your tests take place. ----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() I'll repeat. No test is necessary in my mind. I have seen the above scenario more than once. If you don't believe it then you test it. In your mind is exactly where -all- your tests take place. So was the picture I posted of the antennas? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wrote in message
... O Seeing how you brought up the bending of the antenna.......... Another disadvantage of the 102" ss whip is the gain lost because of this bending. It is significant. Where are your test results showing a "significant" loss of gain with a wind-bent antenna? Don't even need a test on this one. 1. It can be mathematically calculated. ( I'll let you do that) 2. It looses gain bad enough that you can actually see it and hear it. Example : Two vehicles are traveling together down the expressway at 75mph. One uses a K-40. The other a 102" whip. Both appear to have similar maximum S-meter readings but the 102 " whips signal fades in and out The K-40 does some fading but not nearly as deep as the 102". Never had that problem unless I was shooting skip. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave |