Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old January 29th 06, 09:11 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
 
Posts: n/a
Default 102" whip

O
Seeing how you brought up the bending of the antenna..........
Another disadvantage of the 102" ss whip is the gain lost because of
this bending. It is significant.



Where are your test results showing a "significant" loss of gain with
a wind-bent antenna?


Don't even need a test on this one.

1. It can be mathematically calculated. ( I'll let you do that)

2. It looses gain bad enough that you can actually see it and
hear it. Example :

Two vehicles are traveling together down the expressway at 75mph.
One uses a K-40. The other a 102" whip. Both appear to have similar
maximum S-meter readings but the 102 " whips signal fades in and out
The K-40 does some fading but not nearly as deep as the 102".
  #2   Report Post  
Old January 30th 06, 12:07 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
Frank Gilliland
 
Posts: n/a
Default 102" whip

On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:11:34 -0500, wrote in
:

O
Seeing how you brought up the bending of the antenna..........
Another disadvantage of the 102" ss whip is the gain lost because of
this bending. It is significant.



Where are your test results showing a "significant" loss of gain with
a wind-bent antenna?


Don't even need a test on this one.



In your own words:

"If you really wanted to prove it you'd run the test. You don't
because it would upset your thinking on antennas."

"A test is better than no test."


1. It can be mathematically calculated. ( I'll let you do that)



"I don't care what makes it bad. Do the test then you can hypothesize
as to why it didn't perform."


2. It looses gain bad enough that you can actually see it and
hear it. Example :

Two vehicles are traveling together down the expressway at 75mph.
One uses a K-40. The other a 102" whip. Both appear to have similar
maximum S-meter readings but the 102 " whips signal fades in and out
The K-40 does some fading but not nearly as deep as the 102".



"All we need are the facts. Just the facts. Go get the
facts. Run the test and stop posturing."

But I think this one is closer to the truth:

"You are not going to get a definitive answer from me, just
conjecture."






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
  #3   Report Post  
Old January 30th 06, 02:27 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
 
Posts: n/a
Default 102" whip


Don't even need a test on this one.



2. It looses gain bad enough that you can actually see it and
hear it. Example :

Two vehicles are traveling together down the expressway at 75mph.
One uses a K-40. The other a 102" whip. Both appear to have similar
maximum S-meter readings but the 102 " whips signal fades in and out
The K-40 does some fading but not nearly as deep as the 102".



"All we need are the facts. Just the facts. Go get the
facts. Run the test and stop posturing."

But I think this one is closer to the truth:

"You are not going to get a definitive answer from me, just
conjecture."


I'll repeat. No test is necessary in my mind. I have seen the above
scenario more than once. If you don't believe it then you test it.
  #5   Report Post  
Old January 30th 06, 09:42 AM posted to rec.radio.cb
 
Posts: n/a
Default 102" whip


I'll repeat. No test is necessary in my mind. I have seen the above
scenario more than once. If you don't believe it then you test it.



In your mind is exactly where -all- your tests take place.


So was the picture I posted of the antennas?


  #6   Report Post  
Old January 30th 06, 08:28 PM posted to rec.radio.cb
DrDeath
 
Posts: n/a
Default 102" whip

wrote in message
...
O
Seeing how you brought up the bending of the antenna..........
Another disadvantage of the 102" ss whip is the gain lost because of
this bending. It is significant.



Where are your test results showing a "significant" loss of gain with
a wind-bent antenna?


Don't even need a test on this one.

1. It can be mathematically calculated. ( I'll let you do that)

2. It looses gain bad enough that you can actually see it and
hear it. Example :

Two vehicles are traveling together down the expressway at 75mph.
One uses a K-40. The other a 102" whip. Both appear to have similar
maximum S-meter readings but the 102 " whips signal fades in and out
The K-40 does some fading but not nearly as deep as the 102".


Never had that problem unless I was shooting skip.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? John Smith Shortwave 42 June 6th 05 05:08 AM
Why do you use a whip antenna? Dale Shortwave 11 October 5th 04 08:25 AM
Blast from the past...........102 SS whip [email protected] CB 83 November 1st 03 02:31 AM
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency Ron Antenna 0 September 12th 03 01:21 AM
Sony Portable versus Tabletops mike Shortwave 10 August 30th 03 11:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017