Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article .net, "KØHB"
writes: "N2EY" wrote Could the holder of your learners permit ham license operate a ham rig alone? Of course, just like the previous learners permit, aka "Novice". Then it's a license. not being banned for life as your plan would do. They wouldn't be 'banned for life'. They could take the standard qualification test at any time. Sorry if I wasn't clear. They'd be "banned for life" from getting another learner's permit...err, Class B license. FCC or somebody would have to keep a database of everyone who had held one and let it expire without upgrading, to insure that someone wouldn't retest and get a second one. Are there any licenses or learner's permits of *any* kind currently issued by the US Govt. that are one-time-only, upgrade-or-you're-out? None that I'm aware are currently extant, but precedent exists. Sure - a precedent that ended almost 30 years ago. Maybe FCC will go for that idea but I doubt it. btw, the old nonrenewable nonretakeable Novice had one more limitation back in those days: it was for newbies only. Anyone who had *ever* held any class of amateur license, even one that had long since expired, could not get a Novice. It had to be a person's first ham license. Of course back then FCC trusted that when someone checked the box on the Form 610 that said they' never had a ham license before, they weren't fibbing. 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
BPL, the ARRL and the UPLC | Homebrew | |||
NEWS: N2DUP announces for ARRL section manager in Minnesota | General | |||
ARRL FUD about BPL | General |