Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Where in Part 97 of the FCC Rules and Regs -- do you see the word "Hobby" ? (answer nowhere) and where do you see the word "Service" ? Quote Title " PART 97 AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE" Now am I to believe you or the FCC ?? Here in San Diego, a ham hiker overdid it and was grossly dehydrated- his cell phone was not able to make a connection But a Ham repeater that covers all of San Diego county worked just fine SD County is 4,261 square miles. A helicopter was sent in and after several hours in a hospital the dry ham recovered Now would you call that a hobby or a service ?? This has happened time after time in disaster situations and as Walter Cronkite stated "Amateur Radio is probably the only fail-safe communications in the world" It is of no importance as to the ratio of cell phone calls to ham radio 911 calls. What is important and vital is that we have both - wouldn't you say ? -- Incognito By Necessity (:-( If you can't convince them, confuse them. - - -Harry S Truman "Bill Sohl" wrote in message hlink.net... "William" wrote in message om... JJ wrote in message ... Len Over 21 wrote: Anonymous one who has no amateur call, you cannot admit your error. To do so would be against your mythology, the fantasy that amateur radio always jumps in to save the day. Not always, but always when needed and has saved the day many times. That you can't be a part of it to get your recognition really gets your goat doesn't it? Would you estimate that in the last decade more cellular telephones have saved the day than all of amateur radio in the last century? What's your point? The same can be said of many things. Ham radio is still a service and considered by the FCC to be of sufficient value as a service to warrant keeping it around. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Incognito wrote:
Where in Part 97 of the FCC Rules and Regs -- do you see the word "Hobby" ? (answer nowhere) and where do you see the word "Service" ? Quote Title " PART 97 AMATEUR RADIO SERVICE" Now am I to believe you or the FCC ?? Here in San Diego, a ham hiker overdid it and was grossly dehydrated- his cell phone was not able to make a connection But a Ham repeater that covers all of San Diego county worked just fine SD County is 4,261 square miles. A helicopter was sent in and after several hours in a hospital the dry ham recovered Now would you call that a hobby or a service ?? This has happened time after time in disaster situations and as Walter Cronkite stated "Amateur Radio is probably the only fail-safe communications in the world" It is of no importance as to the ratio of cell phone calls to ham radio 911 calls. What is important and vital is that we have both - wouldn't you say ? -- Incognito By Necessity (:-( If you can't convince them, confuse them. - - -Harry S Truman We have to understand that there are those who envy ham radio and it's long tradition to public servicea and it's ability to come to aid in times of emergency, often being the only means of reliable communications. These envious people are too lacking in knowledge or are too lazy to do what is necessary to qualify for a ham license themselves, so the best they can to is attempt to tear down an institution that they cannot be, but desperatly want to be, a part of. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
"William" wrote in message om... JJ wrote in message ... Len Over 21 wrote: Anonymous one who has no amateur call, you cannot admit your error. To do so would be against your mythology, the fantasy that amateur radio always jumps in to save the day. Not always, but always when needed and has saved the day many times. That you can't be a part of it to get your recognition really gets your goat doesn't it? Would you estimate that in the last decade more cellular telephones have saved the day than all of amateur radio in the last century? It doesn't matter if it is more or less. Both have been used and both are valuable. We need to keep as many forms of communication as possible so that there will be at least one, preferably more than one, mode available in times of need. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote in message ...
William wrote: Would you estimate that in the last decade more cellular telephones have saved the day than all of amateur radio in the last century? One a daily basis such as reporting traffic accidents, calling for an ambulance, and other minor emergencies, probably, but in a major disaster cell networks tend to become overloaded and useless. Ask the emergency officals in NYC about 9/11. The cell phone networks were so overloaded they were practically useless for any emergency efforts. That is why the hams were called in. Your point is? Many, many, many, many, many people claimed to have successfully used their cellular telephones fleeing from the Twin Towers. It was in the news. Post 9/11, sales of cellular phones skyrocketted. It was in the news. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
William wrote:
Many, many, many, many, many people claimed to have successfully used their cellular telephones fleeing from the Twin Towers. It was in the news. Post 9/11, sales of cellular phones skyrocketted. It was in the news. That is why the cell network was no good for any emergency assistance communications, it was people overloading the network to call someone to say they got out alive, calling everyone they knew to turn on the TV, ect. The cell network can't be counted on for emergency aid in such a crisis as everyone wants to use their phone for non emergency aid type calls. That is what I meant when I said in my post that cell networks tend to become overloaded so that they are practically useless for emergency aid, so of course there were many, many, many people making calls, that is why the network was overloaded - DUH. And the skyrocketing sales of cellular phones after 9/11 will assure that in the event of another such disaster, the network will be even more overloaded. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
JJ wrote in message ...
William wrote: Many, many, many, many, many people claimed to have successfully used their cellular telephones fleeing from the Twin Towers. It was in the news. Post 9/11, sales of cellular phones skyrocketted. It was in the news. That is why the cell network was no good for any emergency assistance communications, it was people overloading the network to call someone to say they got out alive, calling everyone they knew to turn on the TV, ect. The cell network can't be counted on for emergency aid in such a crisis as everyone wants to use their phone for non emergency aid type calls. That is what I meant when I said in my post that cell networks tend to become overloaded so that they are practically useless for emergency aid, so of course there were many, many, many people making calls, that is why the network was overloaded - DUH. And the skyrocketing sales of cellular phones after 9/11 will assure that in the event of another such disaster, the network will be even more overloaded. The fact remains that many emergency calls were placed and got through using cellular telephones. Heaven forbid an emergency happens during a contest weekend! |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
William wrote:
The fact remains that many emergency calls were placed and got through using cellular telephones. Does that upset you or do you find it some sort of validation for your latest peculiar theory? Heaven forbid an emergency happens during a contest weekend! How does a cellphone contest work? Dave K8MN |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
(William) wrote in message om...
(Steve Robeson, K4CAP) wrote in message . com... (William) wrote in message . com... JJ wrote in message ... Len Over 21 wrote: Anonymous one who has no amateur call, you cannot admit your error. To do so would be against your mythology, the fantasy that amateur radio always jumps in to save the day. Not always, but always when needed and has saved the day many times. That you can't be a part of it to get your recognition really gets your goat doesn't it? Would you estimate that in the last decade more cellular telephones have saved the day than all of amateur radio in the last century? Lennie's insistance that Amateur Radio "always" saves the day is his way of skewing the results in his favor. Oh, contraire! Larry Roll has set up many a scenario where not only is amateur radio the ONLY means to save the day, but only ONE particular mode is suitable to save the day. He's done it again and again. Are we Not to believe Roll? Sorry, Brain... The post I responded to was from your douchebag friend. Exact same is quoted verbatim above. Don't divert the post in order to divert attention from YOUR foolishness...THAT is already public information and beyond YOUR control. My post addressed NO ONE except your chief string puller and documented liar, Lennie the Loser. His post did EXACTLY what I claimed it to...to try ans skew results in such a way as to make him appear corect. He's not. Try again, Puppet Boy. Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1398  May 28, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1367 – October 24 2003 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1353 – July 18, 2003 | General |