Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "Jack Twilley" wrote If it is, NCI should be raising holy hell about the pro-code conspiracy behind all these contests, right? One NCI Director calls contests "electronic splat ball". Actually, I kinda like that description. One of my grandsons asked about contesting, and I used that metaphor. Now he wants to multi-op with me in this years SS. You could measure it yourself, you know. Work two similar contests (say, two of the QSO parties coming up soon). Operate solely in phone for the first contest. Score your points and keep track of your experience with notes or something. Operate solely in CW for the second contest. Do the same sort of scoring and note-taking. Report back to the group with your personal experience. I regularly work both weekends of SS (CW one weekend, Phone two weeks later). Both are scored the same way, each two-way contact counts for 2 points (a message sent and a message received). Personally I enjoy the CW weekend more, but invariably score higher on Phone weekend, simply because I can copy CW at only about 45 WPM, and voice at about 300WPM. 73, de Hans, K0HB PS: If you don't like keyers, you ain't gonna make it contesting. Actually I find that CW is more productive and I'm not nearly as fast at CW (20wpm for contest, 15wpm for ragchew) as you are but then I'm just running 100watts into basic wire antennas. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dee D. Flint" wrote Actually I find that CW is more productive and I'm not nearly as fast at CW (20wpm for contest, 15wpm for ragchew) as you are but then I'm just running 100watts into basic wire antennas. Do you run a frequency, or do you "search and pounce"? If you have a modest station and you S&P, then CW will likely be more productive because the gating factor is **getting the attention of the target station**. CW can be better at that because you can 'un-zero-beat' to stand out from the pile up and use other tricks and skills. However, if you're running a frequency, then the **speed with which you can exchange messages** is the gating factor, and voice is faster than Morse by quite a margin. The November SS is a particularly good event to compare CW vs. Phone, since the two weekends are close together (share the same general propagation conditions) and the list of participants is nearly identical between the two weekends so differing skill levels and station configurations are factored out. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "KØHB" wrote in message link.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote Actually I find that CW is more productive and I'm not nearly as fast at CW (20wpm for contest, 15wpm for ragchew) as you are but then I'm just running 100watts into basic wire antennas. Do you run a frequency, or do you "search and pounce"? If you have a modest station and you S&P, then CW will likely be more productive because the gating factor is **getting the attention of the target station**. CW can be better at that because you can 'un-zero-beat' to stand out from the pile up and use other tricks and skills. However, if you're running a frequency, then the **speed with which you can exchange messages** is the gating factor, and voice is faster than Morse by quite a margin. The November SS is a particularly good event to compare CW vs. Phone, since the two weekends are close together (share the same general propagation conditions) and the list of participants is nearly identical between the two weekends so differing skill levels and station configurations are factored out. 73, de Hans, K0HB I've tried running a frequency on SSB contests but just don't get enough takers to make it worthwhile so I finally end up doing the "search and pounce". I'm not good enough yet to run a frequency on CW so by necessity do "search and pounce" when operating in this mode. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: Morse and Contests
From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 4/27/2004 8:55 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I've tried running a frequency on SSB contests but just don't get enough takers to make it worthwhile so I finally end up doing the "search and pounce". I'm not good enough yet to run a frequency on CW so by necessity do "search and pounce" when operating in this mode. I had a lot more fun just setting a "personal goal" and working towards that when I get into a contest. I set out to get a "Clean Sweep" a few yeas ago and did it...with less than 150 Q's on each mode! I'm wondering how many S-units will be added to my 100 watt mobile signal if it's "/VO1" in the next Sweepstakes...?!?! 73 Steve, K4YZ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Morse and Contests From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 4/27/2004 8:55 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I've tried running a frequency on SSB contests but just don't get enough takers to make it worthwhile so I finally end up doing the "search and pounce". I'm not good enough yet to run a frequency on CW so by necessity do "search and pounce" when operating in this mode. I had a lot more fun just setting a "personal goal" and working towards that when I get into a contest. I set out to get a "Clean Sweep" a few yeas ago and did it...with less than 150 Q's on each mode! My goal is to try to up my personal best each time I revisit the same contest. Two years in a row now, I have missed getting all 67 counties in the PAQSO by *one* county. That is my biggest goal this year. Second goal is to be first from PA in the New England QSO party. I've been stuck at third for the last two years. I did a lot better last year than the year before, but so have the people I'm competing with. I'm wondering how many S-units will be added to my 100 watt mobile signal if it's "/VO1" in the next Sweepstakes...?!?! You gonna be pop-u-lar! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Morse and Contests From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 4/27/2004 8:55 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I've tried running a frequency on SSB contests but just don't get enough takers to make it worthwhile so I finally end up doing the "search and pounce". I'm not good enough yet to run a frequency on CW so by necessity do "search and pounce" when operating in this mode. I had a lot more fun just setting a "personal goal" and working towards that when I get into a contest. I set out to get a "Clean Sweep" a few yeas ago and did it...with less than 150 Q's on each mode! My goal is to try to up my personal best each time I revisit the same contest. Two years in a row now, I have missed getting all 67 counties in the PAQSO by *one* county. That is my biggest goal this year. Second goal is to be first from PA in the New England QSO party. I've been stuck at third for the last two years. I did a lot better last year than the year before, but so have the people I'm competing with. I'm wondering how many S-units will be added to my 100 watt mobile signal if it's "/VO1" in the next Sweepstakes...?!?! You gonna be pop-u-lar! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - I would rather see him sign from the Yukon myself. Much rarer. Dan/W4NTI |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Steve Robeson K4CAP wrote: Subject: Morse and Contests From: "Dee D. Flint" Date: 4/27/2004 8:55 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: I've tried running a frequency on SSB contests but just don't get enough takers to make it worthwhile so I finally end up doing the "search and pounce". I'm not good enough yet to run a frequency on CW so by necessity do "search and pounce" when operating in this mode. I had a lot more fun just setting a "personal goal" and working towards that when I get into a contest. I set out to get a "Clean Sweep" a few yeas ago and did it...with less than 150 Q's on each mode! My goal is to try to up my personal best each time I revisit the same contest. Two years in a row now, I have missed getting all 67 counties in the PAQSO by *one* county. That is my biggest goal this year. Second goal is to be first from PA in the New England QSO party. I've been stuck at third for the last two years. I did a lot better last year than the year before, but so have the people I'm competing with. I'm wondering how many S-units will be added to my 100 watt mobile signal if it's "/VO1" in the next Sweepstakes...?!?! You gonna be pop-u-lar! 8^) - Mike KB3EIA - I would rather see him sign from the Yukon myself. Much rarer. That would be a real adventure during that time of the year. I never had a VE8 (why does that remind me of a commercial??) ever, much less in a contest. - mike KB3EIA - |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC Assigns RM Numbers To Three New Restructuring Petitions | Policy | |||
Rev.Jim the troller (was Bootlegging in 1948?) | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | Policy | |||
Ham Radio In The Post-Code Testing Era | Policy | |||
With CW gone, can the CW allocations be far behind? | General |