Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Len Anderson wrote: In article , John Kasupski writes: On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 19:39:23 GMT, Dave Heil wrote: Wow! Talk about speculation! How about it, lurking, never-posting readers of r.r.a.p? Let us know if you support the self-appointed advocate for morse code test removal of the group. Tell us if you believe his method is effective. Let us hear if you have been swayed by his posts. Hello John. The heavenly fodder wishes to both troll and make nasty to another in his "asking of questions." Oh, not "nasty" at all. You perceive yourself as Don Quixote. We're just interested in seeing if your rants actually have any support or if you're just the slovenly, bile spitting idiot we all think you are. So far, it seems "not". To take the three questions in order... 1. Yes, I support the contention that the code test should be removed. I say Good on You! Boy...isn't THAT a surprise...?!?! 2. No, I do not believe that his method is effective. However, I also basically believe that no other method would be any more effective than his, which is one of the reasons why I'm mainly a lurker here and rarely post. "Effective," e-schmective... Da heavenly fodder hasn't come close to being effective in doing anything but reinforcing his image of the prussian offizier busy mouthing the party line of the Church of St. Hiram. Lennie's ineffectiveness as a cheerleader is pretty well summed up in the character of that paragraph. 3. No, I have not been swayed by his posts. In fact, I already believed it was time to do away with code testing back in the mid-1970's, which was twenty years before I ever discovered this newsgroup and its various inhabitants. The same for me but a bit earlier....like two decades before. Uh huh...Was that before you allegedly learned code to 10 WPM or after? (I say it's yet another "LennieLie". I don't think you could tap out SOS if it was etched in scars on your arms. Back when I volunteered for U.S. Army duty...(SNIP) More of his "I Was A Rear Area Radio Clerk War Hero" rants. The pro-code-test-advocates (PCTA) seem to think that morseman- ship is soooooo necessary that the FCC *must* test for it in order to get a ham license for use below 30 MHz. Well, it may BE a necessity...all those morsemen need to have playmates on their little reserved slices of ham bands...their sandboxes aren't full yet and more and more have signed off permanently. And we hope and pray YOUR QRT date is just around the same corner! Steve, K4YZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
PSK baud rates on HF | Digital | |||
Ultra low bit rates | Digital | |||
Ultra low bit rates | Digital | |||
Parabolic dish gives weak performance increase | Antenna | |||
PSK baud rates on HF | Digital |