| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
K=D8HB wrote: "Bill Sohl" wrote Just some additional things to consider...it isn't just a black and white issue. There's all sorts of grey areas in the realm of free speech limits. Hi Bill, Long time, no see! Hope you're well. Everything you've described is a PRICE, not a limit. Sure it's a limit, Hans. Know why there's no Hummer in my driveway? Becasue it costs over $60,000 to get one equipped the way I'd like it. If the price was half that, I'd have one. Seems like a limit to me. You can argue the language all day long, Hans, but whether it's a line in a lawbook saying "Thou shalt not..." or the threat of monetary forfiture or imprisonment, there ARE limits. You can use your same "argument" to say that there is no "limit" to commiting murder or bank robbbery. In accordance with the US Constitution I can say anything I want to say. The price I pay may be that I lose acess to a particular channel communications channel, but I am in no way limited in what I may say. Stand up in a populated room and say "I am going to kill the President" and see how far your "limit" on what you THINK you can say goes. The control freaks may persuade the likes of "Consolidated" to decline to carry Todd's words to us, but in no way can they prevent him from saying them. You try to set your own limits on what others say, Hans, by applying your own labels, ie: "control freaks", with the intention that this will cause them to change what they say to avoid your labelling. You are trying to set your own limits. You are very much the same "control freak" that you accuse others of being. Unfortunately, rather than engage in an honest two-way dialog with someone with the grapes to identify himself, it is likely that Todd will become another of the many "Lloyd's" who infest rrap. Yes, Todd "identified" himself, and as you say, he had "the grapes" to do it. Todd's issues are not with signing his name. They are with his lack of civility and his failure to recognize that his behaviour, both in this forum and on the air, are not welcomed. "Congress shall make no law.... abridging the freedom of speech...." --Amendment I, US Constitution I know that by pointing this out I stand in danger of the same treatment as accorded to Todd, but let Steve do "his best" as he earlier alluded in relation to a member of my family. I offered you a sincere "best wishes", Hans, and as usual you tried to turn it into something else. I have, in the past, refered to you as "Lennie with a License", and that is exactly why. As Bill aptly pointed out, the First Ammendment restricts the government from arbitrarily making those laws. NOTHING in the Constitution says that it can't be ammended if the citizens it governs so choose to do so. Perhaps it's time. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"K4YZ" wrote NOTHING in the Constitution says that it can't be ammended if the citizens it governs so choose to do so. Absolutely true, Steve. Go to work on that. In the meantime, Ammendment I is the law of the land, regardless of how distasteful you find it. de Hans, K0HB |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"K4YZ" wrote
Stand up in a populated room and say "I am going to kill the President" and see how far your "limit" on what you THINK you can say goes. Nice Lennie-esque attempt at misdirection-by-outrageous-exaggeration, Steve. Todd, however distasteful his language, did not threaten the life of the President. He simply argued (in horribly crude language, and mostly without logical basis) that his rights for free speech on ham radio were threatened. You don't agree with his assertions, and neither do I (see we CAN agree on something) but it's spookily ironic that your response was behaviour which reinforced his contention, by suppressing his expression of ideas! "Our liberty depends on the freedom of speech and that cannot be limited without being lost." -- Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826), 3rd US President de Hans, K0HB |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"KØHB" wrote in message nk.net... "K4YZ" wrote Stand up in a populated room and say "I am going to kill the President" and see how far your "limit" on what you THINK you can say goes. Nice Lennie-esque attempt at misdirection-by-outrageous-exaggeration, Steve. Todd, however distasteful his language, did not threaten the life of the President. He simply argued (in horribly crude language, and mostly without logical basis) that his rights for free speech on ham radio were threatened. You don't agree with his assertions, and neither do I (see we CAN agree on something) but it's spookily ironic that your response was behaviour which reinforced his contention, by suppressing his expression of ideas! Hans are you saying that Todd may say whatever he wants whenever where he wants however he wants on the ham bands? Do you believe then that Part 97 is unconstitutional when it prohibits commericial use and foul language? Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have never used my ham radio for commercial use nor have I used foul
language on it either. Steve assumes that since I do it on the internet then I do it on the ham radio. Steve has never heard my transmission yet he claims that's what I'm doing. Todd N9OGL |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL wrote: I have never used my ham radio for commercial use nor have I used foul language on it either. I never said you used it for commercial purposes. I never said you use profanity on the air...I said you have to POTENTIAL to be the same potty mouth on the air as you are here. Steve assumes that since I do it on the internet then I do it on the ham radio. I assume nothing. However people who insist on violating civil decorum in one forum tend to do it in others. Remember the Vice President's faux pas a few weeks ago...?!?! Steve has never heard my transmission yet he claims that's what I'm doing. You continue to insist that I have never heard you on the air, Todd, yet you've never been to my station to know if I have or not, nor have you had any representitive in my home to attest one way or the other. Why do you keep making this assertion when you know it's not true...?!?! And what seventh grader did you pay to make that post for you, Todd...?!?! No profanity...Proper grammar...You even got periods in the right places. I am impressed...What ever you paid the kid, double it and keep him/her around... Congratulations. 73 Steve, K4YZ |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
I never said you used it for commercial purposes. I never said
you use profanity on the air...I said you have to POTENTIAL to be the same potty mouth on the air as you are here. Don't assume anything stevey, despite what YOU think the internet and radio are two different media's are are regulated differently. What you can not say on the radio you can say on the internet. I'll ignore the rest of the crap you wrote. Todd N9OGL |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
N9OGL wrote: I never said you used it for commercial purposes. I never said you use profanity on the air...I said you have to POTENTIAL to be the same potty mouth on the air as you are here. Don't assume anything stevey, despite what YOU think the internet and radio are two different media's are are regulated differently. What you can not say on the radio you can say on the internet. I'll ignore the rest of the crap you wrote. Of course you will...You can't answer any of it in any meaningful way that DOESN'T make you look like a fool...so take the easy way out. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
More mistruth from the N9OGL lie-fest, n9oglvoice.blogspot.com:
Well, the beat goes on, and the question is who's threating who? Let's start at he beginning, N9OGL (ME) announced on the newsgroup rec.radio.amateur,policy that I was going to run an information bulletin on HF. (An Information bulletin is not defined by the FCC except that an information bulletin has to be directed to amateur radio operators and consist solely of amateur radio material.(97.3(a)(26) An "information bulletin" that you refer to as a "show". A "show" that is nothing more than a showcase for your rhetoric.. It was then that control freak Steven Robbieson K4YZ began his nazi style campaign against me and my information bulletin claiming it was illegal and even had the balls to tell my internet service provider that I was "promote wanton violation of federal regulations" (Letter to Illinois Consolidated Communication). He claimed all this #### despite the fact that I proved that he was full of ####. Todd...I gave you a "pass" on this the first time around because I know it was too easy for you to get confused with everything going on... You ARE promoting wanton violation of FCC rules and regulations. You have stated, on numerous occassions, that you operated both a "pirate" TV and FM station...You've said you'd do it again. I gave a link to the FCC website that stated what I've been say the whole time, that my staion is legal and there NOTHING he can do about it. So you have. And I provided links to YOUR assertions of the aforementioned "pirate" operations. Along with your gross profanities, razor blade comments, references to my deceased daughter, etc etc etc. Civil people don't act that way, Todd, and your ISP agreed. You were warned but blew it off. He claims that I'm abusive yet he has to cry and whine like the little ##### he is, to my service provider claiming I'm promote wanton violation of federal law although he knows dam well that my information bulletin are legal, It's not about your shows, Todd.... If he doesn't then he is just as dumb as I thought he was. Speaking of dumb, that brings us to steve's girlfriend Little Jimmy KC8GXW who claims he's going to run two radio's on either side of my information bulletin (malicious Interference). And like I said...If he does, then that's on him...And my wife won't let me have a girlfriend, Todd. Although he might think it funny that he and his little #### K4YZ is "yanking my chain" we will see if the FCC thinks their yanking my chain is funny! I am not yanking your chain, Todd...I told you it had BEEN yanked... So who's threating who? we have liar K4YZ and his little whore Jimmy getting on the newsgroup acting like they own the place and suggestion to cause malicious interference with my LEGAL station. You SAY it's legal. We have no evidence of it. You randymouthed other correspondents about being "appliance operators", yet when tasked to list YOUR station, you balked. I hope that people on that newsgroup wise up and kick Stevey and Jimmy harassing ###es off the newsgroup. The harrassing one already got booted, Todd. At least for a while...The one who signed your name and call yesterday was actually polite and civil. Was that you, or did you give someone your password...?!?! Steve, K4YZ |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steve,
An "information bulletin" that you refer to as a "show". A "show" that is nothing more than a showcase for your rhetoric.. Despite what you hink steve and information bulletin doesn't have to be a "newscast" it only has to be directed only to amteur radio operators consisting solely of subject matter of direct interest to the amateur service. Todd...I gave you a "pass" on this the first time around because I know it was too easy for you to get confused with everything going on... You ARE promoting wanton violation of FCC rules and regulations. You have stated, on numerous occassions, that you operated both a "pirate" TV and FM station...You've said you'd do it again. First off I never ran a Pirate radio station, I applied for a LPFM license, Secondly that's between me and the FCC, and as I stated before they will NOT doing anything about, and finally You don't know what the HELL was going on so I suggest you shut your ****ing mouth, that does concern you. And I provided links to YOUR assertions of the aforementioned "pirate" operations. Along with your gross profanities, razor blade comments, references to my deceased daughter, etc etc etc. Civil people don't act that way, Todd, and your ISP agreed. You were warned but blew it off. First off you taking the razor blade too serious....I don't you name in that post and was not directed towards you directly. The problem with service porviders is they only respond to complaints they don't investigate the complaint. if my ISP was on here and realize what a PRICK you are perhaps they would change their mine. You SAY it's legal. We have no evidence of it. You randymouthed other correspondents about being "appliance operators", yet when tasked to list YOUR station, you balked Below there is a link to the FCC website where you and others on this website can read all about information bulletins http://wireless.fcc.gov/services/ama...nications.html The harrassing one already got booted, Todd. At least for a while...The one who signed your name and call yesterday was actually polite and civil. Was that you, or did you give someone your password...?!?! Well steve on a final note I hope that people on this newsgroup wise up and get sick of your harassment and boot your sorry ass off the newsgroup Todd N9OGL |
| Reply |
|
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Which Todd Do We Believe...??? | Policy | |||
| K4YZ ANSWER MY QUESTION | Policy | |||
| Boy broadcaster N9OGL - Part One | Policy | |||
| Todd Faking "Responses" to Posts On His Blog | Policy | |||
| Boy Broadcaster N9OGL - Part II | Policy | |||